linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/17] arm64: Add KVM_HVHE capability and has_hvhe() predicate
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 10:07:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221020090727.3669908-3-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221020090727.3669908-1-maz@kernel.org>

Expose a capability keying the hVHE feature as well as a new
predicate testing it. Nothing is so far using it, and nothing
is enabling it yet.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h       |  8 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 15 +++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps            |  1 +
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index f44a7860636f..2d41015429b3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #define cpu_feature(x)		KERNEL_HWCAP_ ## x
 
 #define ARM64_SW_FEATURE_OVERRIDE_NOKASLR	0
+#define ARM64_SW_FEATURE_OVERRIDE_HVHE		4
 
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
index 4eb601e7de50..b11a1c8c8b36 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
@@ -140,6 +140,14 @@ static __always_inline bool is_protected_kvm_enabled(void)
 		return cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_KVM_PROTECTED_MODE);
 }
 
+static __always_inline bool has_hvhe(void)
+{
+	if (is_vhe_hyp_code())
+		return false;
+
+	return cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_KVM_HVHE);
+}
+
 static inline bool is_hyp_nvhe(void)
 {
 	return is_hyp_mode_available() && !is_kernel_in_hyp_mode();
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index a3959e9f7d55..efac89c4c548 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1932,6 +1932,15 @@ static void cpu_copy_el2regs(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
 		write_sysreg(read_sysreg(tpidr_el1), tpidr_el2);
 }
 
+static bool hvhe_possible(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
+			  int __unused)
+{
+	u64 val;
+
+	val = arm64_sw_feature_override.val & arm64_sw_feature_override.mask;
+	return cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ARM64_SW_FEATURE_OVERRIDE_HVHE);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PAN
 static void cpu_enable_pan(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
 {
@@ -2642,6 +2651,12 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
 		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
 		.cpu_enable = cpu_trap_el0_impdef,
 	},
+	{
+		.desc = "VHE for hypervisor only",
+		.capability = ARM64_KVM_HVHE,
+		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_STRICT_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
+		.matches = hvhe_possible,
+	},
 	{},
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
index f1c0347ec31a..cee2be85b89b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ HAS_TLB_RANGE
 HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN
 HAS_WFXT
 HW_DBM
+KVM_HVHE
 KVM_PROTECTED_MODE
 MISMATCHED_CACHE_TYPE
 MTE
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-20  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20  9:07 [PATCH 00/17] KVM: arm64: Allow using VHE in the nVHE hypervisor Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 01/17] arm64: Turn kaslr_feature_override into a generic SW feature override Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-06-01  7:01   ` [PATCH 02/17] arm64: Add KVM_HVHE capability and has_hvhe() predicate Oliver Upton
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 03/17] arm64: Don't enable VHE for the kernel if OVERRIDE_HVHE is set Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 04/17] arm64: Prevent the use of is_kernel_in_hyp_mode() in hypervisor code Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 05/17] arm64: Allow EL1 physical timer access when running VHE Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 06/17] arm64: Use CPACR_EL1 format to set CPTR_EL2 when E2H is set Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 07/17] KVM: arm64: Elide kern_hyp_va() in VHE-specific parts of the hypervisor Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 08/17] KVM: arm64: Remove alternatives from sysreg accessors in VHE hypervisor context Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 09/17] KVM: arm64: Key use of VHE instructions in nVHE code off ARM64_KVM_HVHE Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 10/17] KVM: arm64: Force HCR_EL2.E2H when ARM64_KVM_HVHE is set Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 11/17] KVM: arm64: Disable TTBR1_EL2 when using ARM64_KVM_HVHE Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 12/17] KVM: arm64: Adjust EL2 stage-1 leaf AP bits when ARM64_KVM_HVHE is set Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 13/17] KVM: arm64: Rework CPTR_EL2 programming for HVHE configuration Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 14/17] KVM: arm64: Program the timer traps with VHE layout in hVHE mode Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 15/17] KVM: arm64: Force HCR_E2H in guest context when ARM64_KVM_HVHE is set Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 16/17] arm64: Allow arm64_sw.hvhe on command line Marc Zyngier
2022-10-20  9:07 ` [PATCH 17/17] KVM: arm64: Terrible timer hack for M1 with hVHE Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221020090727.3669908-3-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).