public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
Cc: <ssantosh@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<grygorii.strashko@ti.com>, <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	<nfrayer@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: k3-ringacc: Allow the driver to be built as module
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:55:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221028005521.gzdo46oz65cxlthd@recent> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021080231.1076-1-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>

On 11:02-20221021, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> The ring accelerator driver can be built as module since all depending
> functions are exported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig      |  2 +-
>  drivers/soc/ti/k3-ringacc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig
> index 7e2fb1c16af1..e009d9589af4 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ config TI_SCI_PM_DOMAINS
>  	  rootfs may be available.
>  
>  config TI_K3_RINGACC
> -	bool "K3 Ring accelerator Sub System"
> +	tristate "K3 Ring accelerator Sub System"
>  	depends on ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST
>  	depends on TI_SCI_INTA_IRQCHIP
>  	help
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-ringacc.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-ringacc.c
> index f7bf18b8229a..e011412f2975 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-ringacc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-ringacc.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> -#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -336,6 +336,11 @@ struct k3_ring *k3_ringacc_request_ring(struct k3_ringacc *ringacc,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&ringacc->req_lock);
>  
> +	if (!try_module_get(ringacc->dev->driver->owner)) {

Does a cascaded error handling make sense instead?

goto error_mod_fail?

> +		mutex_unlock(&ringacc->req_lock);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (id == K3_RINGACC_RING_ID_ANY) {
>  		/* Request for any general purpose ring */
>  		struct ti_sci_resource_desc *gp_rings =
> @@ -380,6 +385,7 @@ struct k3_ring *k3_ringacc_request_ring(struct k3_ringacc *ringacc,
>  	return &ringacc->rings[id];
>  
>  error:
> +	module_put(ringacc->dev->driver->owner);

error_mod_fail:

>  	mutex_unlock(&ringacc->req_lock);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> @@ -616,6 +622,8 @@ int k3_ringacc_ring_free(struct k3_ring *ring)
>  no_init:
>  	clear_bit(ring->ring_id, ringacc->rings_inuse);
>  
> +	module_put(ringacc->dev->driver->owner);
> +
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&ringacc->req_lock);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1450,6 +1458,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id k3_ringacc_of_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "ti,am654-navss-ringacc", .data = &k3_ringacc_data, },
>  	{},
>  };
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_ringacc_of_match);
>  
>  struct k3_ringacc *k3_ringacc_dmarings_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  					    struct k3_ringacc_init_data *data)
> @@ -1544,12 +1553,26 @@ static int k3_ringacc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int k3_ringacc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct k3_ringacc *ringacc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&k3_ringacc_list_lock);
> +	list_del(&ringacc->list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&k3_ringacc_list_lock);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct platform_driver k3_ringacc_driver = {
>  	.probe		= k3_ringacc_probe,
> +	.remove		= k3_ringacc_remove,
>  	.driver		= {
>  		.name	= "k3-ringacc",
>  		.of_match_table = k3_ringacc_of_match,
> -		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,

Might be good to note sysfs behavior change in commit log?

>  	},
>  };
> -builtin_platform_driver(k3_ringacc_driver);
> +module_platform_driver(k3_ringacc_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

GPL ? checkpatch should have complained?

> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI Ringacc driver for K3 SOCs");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>");
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-28  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21  8:02 [PATCH] soc: ti: k3-ringacc: Allow the driver to be built as module Peter Ujfalusi
2022-10-25 15:04 ` Nicolas Frayer
2022-10-28  0:55 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2022-10-29  6:45   ` Péter Ujfalusi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221028005521.gzdo46oz65cxlthd@recent \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfrayer@baylibre.com \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox