From: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Rossi <nathan@nathanrossi.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Rossi <nathan.rossi@digi.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: mvebu: Set Target Link Speed for 2.5GT downstream devices
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 09:43:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221107084346.ksdhcxk7bppvpmqc@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221107081327.336239-1-nathan@nathanrossi.com>
On Monday 07 November 2022 08:13:27 Nathan Rossi wrote:
> From: Nathan Rossi <nathan.rossi@digi.com>
>
> There is a known issue with the mvebu PCIe controller when triggering
> retraining of the link (via Link Control) where the link is dropped
> completely causing significant delay in the renegotiation of the link.
> This occurs only when the downstream device is 2.5GT and the upstream
> port is configured to support both 2.5GT and 5GT.
>
> It is possible to prevent this link dropping by setting the associated
> link speed in Target Link Speed of the Link Control 2 register. This
> only needs to be done when the downstream is specifically 2.5GT.
>
> This change applies the required Target Link Speed value during
> mvebu_pcie_setup_hw conditionally depending on the current link speed
> from the Link Status register, only applying the change when the link
> is configured to 2.5GT already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <nathan.rossi@digi.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> index 1ced73726a..6a869a33ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void mvebu_pcie_setup_wins(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
>
> static void mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
> {
> - u32 ctrl, lnkcap, cmd, dev_rev, unmask, sspl;
> + u32 ctrl, lnkcap, cmd, dev_rev, unmask, sspl, lnksta, lnkctl2;
>
> /* Setup PCIe controller to Root Complex mode. */
> ctrl = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_CTRL_OFF);
> @@ -339,6 +339,22 @@ static void mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
> unmask |= PCIE_INT_INTX(0) | PCIE_INT_INTX(1) |
> PCIE_INT_INTX(2) | PCIE_INT_INTX(3);
> mvebu_writel(port, unmask, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
> +
> + /*
> + * Set Target Link Speed within the Link Control 2 register when the
> + * linked downstream device is connected at 2.5GT. This is configured
> + * in order to avoid issues with the controller when the upstream port
> + * is configured to support 2.5GT and 5GT and the downstream device is
> + * linked at 2.5GT, retraining the link in this case causes the link to
> + * drop taking significant time to retrain.
> + */
> + lnksta = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_CAP_PCIEXP + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL) >> 16;
> + if ((lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS) == PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS_2_5GB) {
This code does not work because at this stage endpoint device does not
have to be ready and therefore link is not established yet.
Also this code is not running when kernel issue PCIe Hot Reset via
PCI Secondary Bus Reset bit.
And it does not handle possible hot-plug situation.
That check that code below has to be done _after_ kernel enumerate
device. PCI core code has already logic to handle delays for "slow"
devices.
And reverse operation (setting lnkctl2 target speed to original value)
has to be called after unplugging device - when link goes down.
If you want to work on this stuff, I can try to find my notes which I
done during investigation of this issue... where is probably the best
place in kernel pci core code for handling this issue.
> + lnkctl2 = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_CAP_PCIEXP + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2);
> + lnkctl2 &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS;
> + lnkctl2 |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS_2_5GT;
> + mvebu_writel(port, lnkctl2, PCIE_CAP_PCIEXP + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2);
> + }
> }
>
> static struct mvebu_pcie_port *mvebu_pcie_find_port(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie,
> ---
> 2.37.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-07 8:13 [PATCH] PCI: mvebu: Set Target Link Speed for 2.5GT downstream devices Nathan Rossi
2022-11-07 8:43 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2022-11-07 9:10 ` Nathan Rossi
2022-11-07 20:06 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221107084346.ksdhcxk7bppvpmqc@pali \
--to=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan.rossi@digi.com \
--cc=nathan@nathanrossi.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox