[PATCH v3 12/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow ID_DFR0_EL1.PerfMon to be set from userspace

From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow ID_DFR0_EL1.PerfMon to be set from userspace
Date: Mon,  7 Nov 2022 08:54:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221107085435.2581641-13-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221107085435.2581641-1-maz@kernel.org>

Allow userspace to write ID_DFR0_EL1, on the condition that only
the PerfMon field can be altered and be something that is compatible
with what was computed for the AArch64 view of the guest.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 47c882401f3c..094b79b880a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1075,6 +1075,19 @@ static u8 vcpu_pmuver(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static u8 perfmon_to_pmuver(u8 perfmon)
+{
+	switch (perfmon) {
+	case ID_DFR0_PERFMON_8_0:
+		return ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP;
+	case ID_DFR0_PERFMON_IMP_DEF:
+		return ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF;
+	default:
+		/* Anything ARMv8.1+ has the same value. For now. */
+		return perfmon;
+	}
+}
+
 static u8 pmuver_to_perfmon(u8 pmuver)
 {
 	switch (pmuver) {
@@ -1284,6 +1297,43 @@ static int set_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			   const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
+			   u64 val)
+{
+	u8 perfmon, host_perfmon;
+	bool valid_pmu;
+
+	host_perfmon = pmuver_to_perfmon(kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit());
+
+	/*
+	 * Allow DFR0_EL1.PerfMon to be set from userspace as long as
+	 * it doesn't promise more than what the HW gives us on the
+	 * AArch64 side (as everything is emulated with that), and
+	 * that this is a PMUv3.
+	 */
+	perfmon = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_PERFMON), val);
+	if ((perfmon != ID_DFR0_PERFMON_IMP_DEF && perfmon > host_perfmon) ||
+	    (perfmon != 0 && perfmon < ID_DFR0_PERFMON_8_0))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	valid_pmu = (perfmon != 0 && perfmon != ID_DFR0_PERFMON_IMP_DEF);
+
+	/* Make sure view register and PMU support do match */
+	if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) != valid_pmu)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* We can only differ with PerfMon, and anything else is an error */
+	val ^= read_id_reg(vcpu, rd);
+	val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_PERFMON);
+	if (val)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver = perfmon_to_pmuver(perfmon);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * cpufeature ID register user accessors
  *
@@ -1505,7 +1555,9 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	/* CRm=1 */
 	AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR0_EL1),
 	AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR1_EL1),
-	AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_DFR0_EL1),
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg,
+	  .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_dfr0_el1,
+	  .visibility = aa32_id_visibility, },
 	ID_HIDDEN(ID_AFR0_EL1),
 	AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_MMFR0_EL1),
 	AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_MMFR1_EL1),
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
