* [PATCH] arm64: efi: Disable only the misbehaving runtime service on sync exceptions @ 2022-11-08 15:15 Ard Biesheuvel 2022-11-09 14:42 ` Alexandru Elisei 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2022-11-08 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-efi Cc: linux-arm-kernel, catalin.marinas, will, Ard Biesheuvel, Alexandru Elisei Alexandru reports that his Ampere Altra machine, whose buggy firmware triggers a synchronous exception in its implementation of SetTime() when called without SetVirtualAddressMap() having been called first, doesn't quite recover from this, and starts spewing error messages into the log that are unrelated to the buggy runtime service. The driver in question is the EFI RTC driver, which should be fixed in any case, as flooding the log like that (or doing any logging to the kernel log at all on something whuch is not a severe issue) is not ok. However, in this particular case, it would be beneficial for both ordinary use as well as diagnostics regarding broken firmware if we only prevent the broken runtime service from being called again, and permit others (such as GetTime() which triggers the logging or the variable services) from being used as normal. So wire up the existing efi.runtime_supported_mask, and clear the service's bit in the mask if the generic runtime service wrapper observes a return value of EFI_ABORTED, which only happens if a service call is aborted due to an exception. (EFI_ABORTED is not documented as a valid error code for any of the EFI runtime services). Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 1 - arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 +- drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c | 6 ++++-- include/linux/efi.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c index ee53f2a0aa03f54a..a3b8852f2698d9f7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c @@ -153,7 +153,6 @@ asmlinkage efi_status_t __efi_rt_asm_recover(void); asmlinkage efi_status_t efi_handle_runtime_exception(const char *f) { pr_err(FW_BUG "Synchronous exception occurred in EFI runtime service %s()\n", f); - clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &efi.flags); return EFI_ABORTED; } diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c index b0b848d6933afbcf..3f48fdf42d97dc1f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c @@ -757,9 +757,9 @@ void efi_crash_gracefully_on_page_fault(unsigned long phys_addr) /* Signal error status to the efi caller process */ efi_rts_work.status = EFI_ABORTED; + efi.runtime_supported_mask = 0; complete(&efi_rts_work.efi_rts_comp); - clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &efi.flags); pr_info("Froze efi_rts_wq and disabled EFI Runtime Services\n"); /* diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c index f3e54f6616f02475..336b8bcec86d0127 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ struct efi_runtime_work efi_rts_work; ({ \ efi_rts_work.status = EFI_ABORTED; \ \ - if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) { \ - pr_warn_once("EFI Runtime Services are disabled!\n"); \ + if (!efi_rt_services_supported(efi_rts_work.efi_rts_id)) { \ + pr_warn_ratelimited("EFI Runtime Service is disabled!\n");\ goto exit; \ } \ \ @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ struct efi_runtime_work efi_rts_work; else \ pr_err("Failed to queue work to efi_rts_wq.\n"); \ \ + if (efi_rts_work.status == EFI_ABORTED) \ + efi.runtime_supported_mask &= ~efi_rts_work.efi_rts_id; \ exit: \ efi_rts_work.efi_rts_id = EFI_NONE; \ efi_rts_work.status; \ diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h index 929d559ad41d29c6..61b252386d61cc4d 100644 --- a/include/linux/efi.h +++ b/include/linux/efi.h @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ extern unsigned long rci2_table_phys; */ enum efi_rts_ids { EFI_NONE, - EFI_GET_TIME, - EFI_SET_TIME, - EFI_GET_WAKEUP_TIME, - EFI_SET_WAKEUP_TIME, - EFI_GET_VARIABLE, - EFI_GET_NEXT_VARIABLE, - EFI_SET_VARIABLE, - EFI_QUERY_VARIABLE_INFO, - EFI_GET_NEXT_HIGH_MONO_COUNT, - EFI_RESET_SYSTEM, - EFI_UPDATE_CAPSULE, - EFI_QUERY_CAPSULE_CAPS, + EFI_GET_TIME = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_TIME, + EFI_SET_TIME = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_SET_TIME, + EFI_GET_WAKEUP_TIME = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_WAKEUP_TIME, + EFI_SET_WAKEUP_TIME = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_SET_WAKEUP_TIME, + EFI_GET_VARIABLE = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_VARIABLE, + EFI_GET_NEXT_VARIABLE = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_NEXT_VARIABLE_NAME, + EFI_SET_VARIABLE = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_SET_VARIABLE, + EFI_GET_NEXT_HIGH_MONO_COUNT = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_NEXT_HIGH_MONOTONIC_COUNT, + EFI_RESET_SYSTEM = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_RESET_SYSTEM, + EFI_UPDATE_CAPSULE = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_UPDATE_CAPSULE, + EFI_QUERY_CAPSULE_CAPS = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_QUERY_CAPSULE_CAPABILITIES, + EFI_QUERY_VARIABLE_INFO = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_QUERY_VARIABLE_INFO, }; /* -- 2.35.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: efi: Disable only the misbehaving runtime service on sync exceptions 2022-11-08 15:15 [PATCH] arm64: efi: Disable only the misbehaving runtime service on sync exceptions Ard Biesheuvel @ 2022-11-09 14:42 ` Alexandru Elisei 2022-11-09 15:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Alexandru Elisei @ 2022-11-09 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ard Biesheuvel; +Cc: linux-efi, linux-arm-kernel, catalin.marinas, will Hi, On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Alexandru reports that his Ampere Altra machine, whose buggy firmware > triggers a synchronous exception in its implementation of SetTime() when > called without SetVirtualAddressMap() having been called first, doesn't > quite recover from this, and starts spewing error messages into the log > that are unrelated to the buggy runtime service. > > The driver in question is the EFI RTC driver, which should be fixed in > any case, as flooding the log like that (or doing any logging to the > kernel log at all on something whuch is not a severe issue) is not ok. > > However, in this particular case, it would be beneficial for both > ordinary use as well as diagnostics regarding broken firmware if we only > prevent the broken runtime service from being called again, and permit > others (such as GetTime() which triggers the logging or the variable > services) from being used as normal. > > So wire up the existing efi.runtime_supported_mask, and clear the > service's bit in the mask if the generic runtime service wrapper > observes a return value of EFI_ABORTED, which only happens if a service > call is aborted due to an exception. (EFI_ABORTED is not documented as a > valid error code for any of the EFI runtime services). With a kernel built from v6.1-rc4, when doing efibootmgr after the EFI panic happens (so with runtime services disabled), this is what I get: # efibootmgr Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0001": Interrupted system call Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0002": Interrupted system call show_order(): Interrupted system call And dmesg shows: [ 55.941312] efi: EFI Runtime Services are disabled! With this patch on top of v6.1-rc4: # efibootmgr Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0001": Invalid argument Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0002": Invalid argument show_order(): Invalid argument Same thing happens if I cat the Boot001 efivars file. Nothing is printed on dmesg. Changed efi_call_rts() to print the return value, status is 0x8000_0000_0000_000f (or 15 in decimal if casted into an int). Tried to debug further, but I'm not familiar with all the structs and what they represent (for example, efi_call_virt(get_variable, args) calls efi_call_virt_pointer(efi.runtime, get_variable, args), does it end up as __efi_rt_asm_wrapper((efi.runtime)->get_variable, "get_variable", args?) As an aside, it would be really helpful to document the arguments for __efi_rt_asm_wrapper. Pointers here how to debug further would be very welcome. Thanks, Alex > > Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 1 - > arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 +- > drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c | 6 ++++-- > include/linux/efi.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > index ee53f2a0aa03f54a..a3b8852f2698d9f7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > @@ -153,7 +153,6 @@ asmlinkage efi_status_t __efi_rt_asm_recover(void); > asmlinkage efi_status_t efi_handle_runtime_exception(const char *f) > { > pr_err(FW_BUG "Synchronous exception occurred in EFI runtime service %s()\n", f); > - clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &efi.flags); > return EFI_ABORTED; > } > > diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c > index b0b848d6933afbcf..3f48fdf42d97dc1f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c > +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c > @@ -757,9 +757,9 @@ void efi_crash_gracefully_on_page_fault(unsigned long phys_addr) > > /* Signal error status to the efi caller process */ > efi_rts_work.status = EFI_ABORTED; > + efi.runtime_supported_mask = 0; > complete(&efi_rts_work.efi_rts_comp); > > - clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &efi.flags); > pr_info("Froze efi_rts_wq and disabled EFI Runtime Services\n"); > > /* > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c > index f3e54f6616f02475..336b8bcec86d0127 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c > @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ struct efi_runtime_work efi_rts_work; > ({ \ > efi_rts_work.status = EFI_ABORTED; \ > \ > - if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) { \ > - pr_warn_once("EFI Runtime Services are disabled!\n"); \ > + if (!efi_rt_services_supported(efi_rts_work.efi_rts_id)) { \ > + pr_warn_ratelimited("EFI Runtime Service is disabled!\n");\ > goto exit; \ > } \ > \ > @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ struct efi_runtime_work efi_rts_work; > else \ > pr_err("Failed to queue work to efi_rts_wq.\n"); \ > \ > + if (efi_rts_work.status == EFI_ABORTED) \ > + efi.runtime_supported_mask &= ~efi_rts_work.efi_rts_id; \ > exit: \ > efi_rts_work.efi_rts_id = EFI_NONE; \ > efi_rts_work.status; \ > diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h > index 929d559ad41d29c6..61b252386d61cc4d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/efi.h > +++ b/include/linux/efi.h > @@ -1254,18 +1254,18 @@ extern unsigned long rci2_table_phys; > */ > enum efi_rts_ids { > EFI_NONE, > - EFI_GET_TIME, > - EFI_SET_TIME, > - EFI_GET_WAKEUP_TIME, > - EFI_SET_WAKEUP_TIME, > - EFI_GET_VARIABLE, > - EFI_GET_NEXT_VARIABLE, > - EFI_SET_VARIABLE, > - EFI_QUERY_VARIABLE_INFO, > - EFI_GET_NEXT_HIGH_MONO_COUNT, > - EFI_RESET_SYSTEM, > - EFI_UPDATE_CAPSULE, > - EFI_QUERY_CAPSULE_CAPS, > + EFI_GET_TIME = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_TIME, > + EFI_SET_TIME = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_SET_TIME, > + EFI_GET_WAKEUP_TIME = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_WAKEUP_TIME, > + EFI_SET_WAKEUP_TIME = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_SET_WAKEUP_TIME, > + EFI_GET_VARIABLE = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_VARIABLE, > + EFI_GET_NEXT_VARIABLE = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_NEXT_VARIABLE_NAME, > + EFI_SET_VARIABLE = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_SET_VARIABLE, > + EFI_GET_NEXT_HIGH_MONO_COUNT = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_NEXT_HIGH_MONOTONIC_COUNT, > + EFI_RESET_SYSTEM = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_RESET_SYSTEM, > + EFI_UPDATE_CAPSULE = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_UPDATE_CAPSULE, > + EFI_QUERY_CAPSULE_CAPS = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_QUERY_CAPSULE_CAPABILITIES, > + EFI_QUERY_VARIABLE_INFO = EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_QUERY_VARIABLE_INFO, > }; > > /* > -- > 2.35.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: efi: Disable only the misbehaving runtime service on sync exceptions 2022-11-09 14:42 ` Alexandru Elisei @ 2022-11-09 15:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2022-11-09 16:30 ` Alexandru Elisei 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2022-11-09 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexandru Elisei; +Cc: linux-efi, linux-arm-kernel, catalin.marinas, will On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 15:42, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Alexandru reports that his Ampere Altra machine, whose buggy firmware > > triggers a synchronous exception in its implementation of SetTime() when > > called without SetVirtualAddressMap() having been called first, doesn't > > quite recover from this, and starts spewing error messages into the log > > that are unrelated to the buggy runtime service. > > > > The driver in question is the EFI RTC driver, which should be fixed in > > any case, as flooding the log like that (or doing any logging to the > > kernel log at all on something whuch is not a severe issue) is not ok. > > > > However, in this particular case, it would be beneficial for both > > ordinary use as well as diagnostics regarding broken firmware if we only > > prevent the broken runtime service from being called again, and permit > > others (such as GetTime() which triggers the logging or the variable > > services) from being used as normal. > > > > So wire up the existing efi.runtime_supported_mask, and clear the > > service's bit in the mask if the generic runtime service wrapper > > observes a return value of EFI_ABORTED, which only happens if a service > > call is aborted due to an exception. (EFI_ABORTED is not documented as a > > valid error code for any of the EFI runtime services). > > With a kernel built from v6.1-rc4, when doing efibootmgr after the EFI panic > happens (so with runtime services disabled), this is what I get: > > # efibootmgr > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0001": Interrupted system call > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0002": Interrupted system call > show_order(): Interrupted system call > > And dmesg shows: > > [ 55.941312] efi: EFI Runtime Services are disabled! > > With this patch on top of v6.1-rc4: > > # efibootmgr > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0001": Invalid argument > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0002": Invalid argument > show_order(): Invalid argument > > Same thing happens if I cat the Boot001 efivars file. Nothing is printed > on dmesg. > OK, this strongly suggests that the EFI runtime services end up in a funny state after the crash of SetTime(), and subsequent calls to any of them no longer work as expected. > Changed efi_call_rts() to print the return value, status is > 0x8000_0000_0000_000f (or 15 in decimal if casted into an int). Tried to > debug further, but I'm not familiar with all the structs and what they > represent (for example, efi_call_virt(get_variable, args) calls > efi_call_virt_pointer(efi.runtime, get_variable, args), does it end up as > __efi_rt_asm_wrapper((efi.runtime)->get_variable, "get_variable", args?) Indeed. The value of the function pointer is used to make the indirect call, and the string is only used if an error occurs, so we can print it to the log. The remaining arguments are simply the arguments to the firmware call. > As > an aside, it would be really helpful to document the arguments for > __efi_rt_asm_wrapper. Pointers here how to debug further would be very > welcome. > If the log is completely silent, there is not a lot to debug, really. The error value you are observing is EFI_ACCESS_DENIED, and looking at the open source version of the Mt.Jade firmware, this might be the value returned from the secure world helper. One other thing I would like to try is disabling set_time specifically using a command line parameter. Btw could you share the output of dmidecode as well? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: efi: Disable only the misbehaving runtime service on sync exceptions 2022-11-09 15:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel @ 2022-11-09 16:30 ` Alexandru Elisei 2022-11-09 17:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Alexandru Elisei @ 2022-11-09 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ard Biesheuvel; +Cc: linux-efi, linux-arm-kernel, catalin.marinas, will Hi, On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 04:57:14PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 15:42, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > Alexandru reports that his Ampere Altra machine, whose buggy firmware > > > triggers a synchronous exception in its implementation of SetTime() when > > > called without SetVirtualAddressMap() having been called first, doesn't > > > quite recover from this, and starts spewing error messages into the log > > > that are unrelated to the buggy runtime service. > > > > > > The driver in question is the EFI RTC driver, which should be fixed in > > > any case, as flooding the log like that (or doing any logging to the > > > kernel log at all on something whuch is not a severe issue) is not ok. > > > > > > However, in this particular case, it would be beneficial for both > > > ordinary use as well as diagnostics regarding broken firmware if we only > > > prevent the broken runtime service from being called again, and permit > > > others (such as GetTime() which triggers the logging or the variable > > > services) from being used as normal. > > > > > > So wire up the existing efi.runtime_supported_mask, and clear the > > > service's bit in the mask if the generic runtime service wrapper > > > observes a return value of EFI_ABORTED, which only happens if a service > > > call is aborted due to an exception. (EFI_ABORTED is not documented as a > > > valid error code for any of the EFI runtime services). > > > > With a kernel built from v6.1-rc4, when doing efibootmgr after the EFI panic > > happens (so with runtime services disabled), this is what I get: > > > > # efibootmgr > > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0001": Interrupted system call > > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0002": Interrupted system call > > show_order(): Interrupted system call > > > > And dmesg shows: > > > > [ 55.941312] efi: EFI Runtime Services are disabled! > > > > With this patch on top of v6.1-rc4: > > > > # efibootmgr > > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0001": Invalid argument > > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0002": Invalid argument > > show_order(): Invalid argument > > > > Same thing happens if I cat the Boot001 efivars file. Nothing is printed > > on dmesg. > > > > OK, this strongly suggests that the EFI runtime services end up in a > funny state after the crash of SetTime(), and subsequent calls to any > of them no longer work as expected. > > > Changed efi_call_rts() to print the return value, status is > > 0x8000_0000_0000_000f (or 15 in decimal if casted into an int). Tried to > > debug further, but I'm not familiar with all the structs and what they > > represent (for example, efi_call_virt(get_variable, args) calls > > efi_call_virt_pointer(efi.runtime, get_variable, args), does it end up as > > __efi_rt_asm_wrapper((efi.runtime)->get_variable, "get_variable", args?) > > Indeed. > > The value of the function pointer is used to make the indirect call, > and the string is only used if an error occurs, so we can print it to > the log. The remaining arguments are simply the arguments to the > firmware call. Got it, thanks for the explanation. > > > As > > an aside, it would be really helpful to document the arguments for > > __efi_rt_asm_wrapper. Pointers here how to debug further would be very > > welcome. > > > > If the log is completely silent, there is not a lot to debug, really. > > The error value you are observing is EFI_ACCESS_DENIED, and looking at > the open source version of the Mt.Jade firmware, this might be the > value returned from the secure world helper. > > One other thing I would like to try is disabling set_time specifically > using a command line parameter. Hm... had a look at kernel_parameters.txt and the rtc-efi driver and couldn't figure out how to do that. I could just return 0 early from efi_set_time(), I suppose. Is that what you had in mind? > > Btw could you share the output of dmidecode as well? Sure, you can find it at [1] (expires in 6 months, pastebin is unlisted). If it makes a difference, dmidecode was run with the stock Ubuntu kernel (v5.15). [1] https://pastebin.com/eaL2LRCf Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: efi: Disable only the misbehaving runtime service on sync exceptions 2022-11-09 16:30 ` Alexandru Elisei @ 2022-11-09 17:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2022-11-09 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexandru Elisei; +Cc: linux-efi, linux-arm-kernel, catalin.marinas, will On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 17:30, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 04:57:14PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 15:42, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > Alexandru reports that his Ampere Altra machine, whose buggy firmware > > > > triggers a synchronous exception in its implementation of SetTime() when > > > > called without SetVirtualAddressMap() having been called first, doesn't > > > > quite recover from this, and starts spewing error messages into the log > > > > that are unrelated to the buggy runtime service. > > > > > > > > The driver in question is the EFI RTC driver, which should be fixed in > > > > any case, as flooding the log like that (or doing any logging to the > > > > kernel log at all on something whuch is not a severe issue) is not ok. > > > > > > > > However, in this particular case, it would be beneficial for both > > > > ordinary use as well as diagnostics regarding broken firmware if we only > > > > prevent the broken runtime service from being called again, and permit > > > > others (such as GetTime() which triggers the logging or the variable > > > > services) from being used as normal. > > > > > > > > So wire up the existing efi.runtime_supported_mask, and clear the > > > > service's bit in the mask if the generic runtime service wrapper > > > > observes a return value of EFI_ABORTED, which only happens if a service > > > > call is aborted due to an exception. (EFI_ABORTED is not documented as a > > > > valid error code for any of the EFI runtime services). > > > > > > With a kernel built from v6.1-rc4, when doing efibootmgr after the EFI panic > > > happens (so with runtime services disabled), this is what I get: > > > > > > # efibootmgr > > > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0001": Interrupted system call > > > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0002": Interrupted system call > > > show_order(): Interrupted system call > > > > > > And dmesg shows: > > > > > > [ 55.941312] efi: EFI Runtime Services are disabled! > > > > > > With this patch on top of v6.1-rc4: > > > > > > # efibootmgr > > > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0001": Invalid argument > > > Skipping unreadable variable "Boot0002": Invalid argument > > > show_order(): Invalid argument > > > > > > Same thing happens if I cat the Boot001 efivars file. Nothing is printed > > > on dmesg. > > > > > > > OK, this strongly suggests that the EFI runtime services end up in a > > funny state after the crash of SetTime(), and subsequent calls to any > > of them no longer work as expected. > > > > > Changed efi_call_rts() to print the return value, status is > > > 0x8000_0000_0000_000f (or 15 in decimal if casted into an int). Tried to > > > debug further, but I'm not familiar with all the structs and what they > > > represent (for example, efi_call_virt(get_variable, args) calls > > > efi_call_virt_pointer(efi.runtime, get_variable, args), does it end up as > > > __efi_rt_asm_wrapper((efi.runtime)->get_variable, "get_variable", args?) > > > > Indeed. > > > > The value of the function pointer is used to make the indirect call, > > and the string is only used if an error occurs, so we can print it to > > the log. The remaining arguments are simply the arguments to the > > firmware call. > > Got it, thanks for the explanation. > > > > > > As > > > an aside, it would be really helpful to document the arguments for > > > __efi_rt_asm_wrapper. Pointers here how to debug further would be very > > > welcome. > > > > > > > If the log is completely silent, there is not a lot to debug, really. > > > > The error value you are observing is EFI_ACCESS_DENIED, and looking at > > the open source version of the Mt.Jade firmware, this might be the > > value returned from the secure world helper. > > > > One other thing I would like to try is disabling set_time specifically > > using a command line parameter. > > Hm... had a look at kernel_parameters.txt and the rtc-efi driver and > couldn't figure out how to do that. I could just return 0 early from > efi_set_time(), I suppose. Is that what you had in mind? > What I had in mind is introduce a way to override efi.runtime_supported_mask via either a kernel command line option or a EFI variable. I'll code up the latter and send it out so you can give it a spin. Note: just to narrow down the firmware behavior a bit - I fully anticipate having to revert the novamap patch ultimately. > > > > Btw could you share the output of dmidecode as well? > > Sure, you can find it at [1] (expires in 6 months, pastebin is unlisted). > If it makes a difference, dmidecode was run with the stock Ubuntu kernel > (v5.15). > > [1] https://pastebin.com/eaL2LRCf > Thanks. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-09 17:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-11-08 15:15 [PATCH] arm64: efi: Disable only the misbehaving runtime service on sync exceptions Ard Biesheuvel 2022-11-09 14:42 ` Alexandru Elisei 2022-11-09 15:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2022-11-09 16:30 ` Alexandru Elisei 2022-11-09 17:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).