linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	asahi@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] nvme-pci: don't call nvme_init_ctrl_finish from nvme_passthru_end
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:26:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221109062657.GD10528@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f12b92c-a117-9c27-cd67-8c9fd9571a06@grimberg.me>

[note to self: the subject should say nvme instead of nvme-pci]

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 04:55:47AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> nvme_passthrough_end can race with a reset, so we should not call
>> nvme_init_ctrl_finish from here.  Instead just log that the controller
>> capabilities might have changed.
>
> Can you explain here what is the problem caused by calling this from
> here?

I'll add it to the next version:

 - stores to the cels xarray can race
 - the new opal initialization can race

and in general it just updates random controller fields without
a reset, which I'm worried about hitting completely untested code.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-09  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-08 15:02 RFC: nvme-pci: split the probe and reset handlers Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 01/12] nvme-pci: don't call nvme_init_ctrl_finish from nvme_passthru_end Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  2:55   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-09  6:26     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 02/12] nvme: move OPAL setup from PCIe to core Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  2:55   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-09 20:44   ` Keith Busch
2022-11-09 23:22     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-11-13 16:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 03/12] nvme: simplify transport specific device attribute handling Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  2:57   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 04/12] nvme-pci: put the admin queue in nvme_dev_remove_admin Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  2:58   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-09  6:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 05/12] nvme-pci: move more teardown work to nvme_remove Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  3:00   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 06/12] nvme-pci: factor the iod mempool creation into a helper Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  3:00   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 07/12] nvme-pci: factor out a nvme_pci_alloc_ctrl helper Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  3:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-09  6:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 08/12] nvme-pci: set constant paramters in nvme_pci_alloc_ctrl Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  3:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 09/12] nvme-pci: call nvme_pci_configure_admin_queue from nvme_pci_enable Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  3:04   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 10/12] nvme-pci: split nvme_dbbuf_dma_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  3:05   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 11/12] nvme-pci: split the initial probe from the rest path Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  3:14   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-09  6:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09 17:00       ` Keith Busch
2022-11-09 15:18   ` Gerd Bayer
2022-11-09 15:51   ` Keith Busch
2022-11-09 15:56   ` Keith Busch
2022-11-10  3:17   ` Chao Leng
2022-11-13 16:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-08 15:02 ` [PATCH 12/12] nvme-pci: don't unbind the driver on reset failure Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09  3:15   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-09 17:10   ` Keith Busch
2022-11-09 17:12 ` RFC: nvme-pci: split the probe and reset handlers Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221109062657.GD10528@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).