From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2308DC433FE for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:48:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=nISAKgVPI7KP//wPfQFv3teNBYlBnz9Gl+QDe7gnvd8=; b=PZlVTjS1WjUTwp PxHeNFhrEbyju5abUcWUSR7IqQgQ6xKmvDVQRIeoStt4Th4N2+LVGVVsTiijznWOGpkb5Iytf//Zz K5ee3f48jqoPew3/d6azws5pTft6cGcn2G6MDhxnShWLwZrjgn8DZIQWvshtSy36C4pn6FQO7aEMO oeqvc2crJSIfm7t+iHTHz3ztxiByy7ST1MTiTc65qrzOT+Jfsxpcir3l+9WZf+kNYp0JB9vQnUHQz ER/N1Q27yndk9qZbPwZbFHmfdLgFyMw6pYOFo5gdjn426g0AP8Yftt3GPW4vkctvMCyXRHaQRFE9c jMDaRcWzpLGJl8m/FmbQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ouakK-001uTu-3Z; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:47:36 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ouafN-001pyk-Ic for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:42:32 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14865B80F98; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DABE7C433D6; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:42:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1668436946; bh=zsPHg2CbneKaAfSvj9WkPgYa0y7b09xQojV5FYHP5sk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=e5Qy7Rlxxzy9JFuT/hsrGD7f4hcJbO+ae6+Z61L2DEEAQC8FLT8AzwxSGnRYkjM1L JXl7B816rveuzs3L556r6NgStq28YHhw9aR3ouMRpSOfV7M+4blTngit83vE/8cV8J lF4oqxRF2Zpj3r1LLNx0YVeJZdQ1J1mFbOYFMPhwfA07JK8qs7jNlfMQSUduK/CVii R0XwReJzXGRWDzqx9BGNEPMzg8F8LCpNxP83h/yoVp4tFpJyJp2xY2QKy3KOZYnWTO nu0Nb4qLpiFVTOtyQmLtwu55ms6fwZb5cc3ZIn4Gx58AYlv0PLaOHN/sAWctoQRWZ2 lUA80vWx3Wrow== Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:42:21 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Melody Olvera , Joerg Roedel , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: arm-smmu-impl: Add QDU1000 and QRU1000 iommu implementation Message-ID: <20221114144220.GA31043@willie-the-truck> References: <20221026190534.4004945-1-quic_molvera@quicinc.com> <20221026190534.4004945-3-quic_molvera@quicinc.com> <0ae09be0-cb1b-dc27-943b-db64ca97b8c7@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0ae09be0-cb1b-dc27-943b-db64ca97b8c7@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221114_064229_795259_4F122951 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.41 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 03:28:15PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 26/10/2022 21:05, Melody Olvera wrote: > > Add compatible for Qualcomm QDU1000 and QRU1000 SoCs to add iommu > > support for them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera > > --- > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c > > index b2708de25ea3..0580a381a04b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c > > @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_create(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > > static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = { > > { .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2" }, > > { .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500" }, > > + { .compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-smmu-500" }, > > The patch was applied but it contradicts work here: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221102184420.534094-12-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org/ > which explicitly asks not to add such compatibles... Sure, but we've been adding new compatibles for years so I don't mind picking up the last few now before we stop accepting new ones. I already asked Dmitry to respin his series as there are some open comments from others anyway. Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel