From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: arm64: Use a separate function for hyp stage-1 walks
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:25:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221115132532.GA524@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114201127.1814794-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:11:27PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> A subsequent change to the page table walkers adds RCU protection for
> walking stage-2 page tables. KVM uses a global lock to serialize hyp
> stage-1 walks, meaning RCU protection is quite meaningless for
> protecting hyp stage-1 walkers.
>
> Add a new helper, kvm_pgtable_hyp_walk(), for use when walking hyp
> stage-1 tables. Call directly into __kvm_pgtable_walk() as table
> concatenation is not a supported feature at stage-1.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> index a874ce0ce7b5..43b2f1882e11 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> @@ -596,6 +596,30 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_flush(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size);
> int kvm_pgtable_walk(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
> struct kvm_pgtable_walker *walker);
>
> +/**
> + * kvm_pgtable_hyp_walk() - Walk a hyp stage-1 page-table.
> + * @pgt: Page-table structure initialized by kvm_pgtable_hyp_init().
> + * @addr: Input address for the start of the walk.
> + * @size: Size of the range to walk.
> + * @walker: Walker callback description.
> + *
> + * The offset of @addr within a page is ignored and @size is rounded-up to
> + * the next page boundary.
> + *
> + * The walker will walk the page-table entries corresponding to the input
> + * address range specified, visiting entries according to the walker flags.
> + * Invalid entries are treated as leaf entries. Leaf entries are reloaded
> + * after invoking the walker callback, allowing the walker to descend into
> + * a newly installed table.
> + *
> + * Returning a negative error code from the walker callback function will
> + * terminate the walk immediately with the same error code.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int kvm_pgtable_hyp_walk(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
> + struct kvm_pgtable_walker *walker);
Hmm, this feels like slightly the wrong abstraction to me -- there's nothing
hyp-specific about the problem being solved, it's just that the only user
is for hyp walks.
Could we instead rework 'struct kvm_pgtable' slightly so that the existing
'flags' field is no-longer stage-2 specific and includes a KVM_PGTABLE_LOCKED
flag which could be set by kvm_pgtable_hyp_init()?
That way the top-level API remains unchanged and the existing callers will
continue to work.
Cheers,
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-15 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-14 20:11 [PATCH 0/1] KVM: arm64: Skip RCU protection for hyp stage-1 Oliver Upton
2022-11-14 20:11 ` [PATCH 1/1] KVM: arm64: Use a separate function for hyp stage-1 walks Oliver Upton
2022-11-15 13:25 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2022-11-15 17:23 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221115132532.GA524@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox