From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6DBAC433FE for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:48:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=iCKDV3hn320O72vWW9zc1gct8NLVurwPcJecfzLy6U4=; b=qGmI2V+3IjLqLR Nkcq3wPBo+cEwZ3msVFJzZRLnhazFNy8OeQvWdF9ctF4kPN/g1N/xczZxQCwUurXku+bgmwhoKrmU 5U79RQ9AaqwirHpGtSPM/nKxaxg+2NlsQ7Z4OygqgnjK3/taZiOcG6ZEmy9Vodoj5wLHCjpx2V6+q DZ9alfGBTSQUfz1KBA0zDOwjDd3nWc7dNllxZQ3EQvTJI8/ZwOdkJ+dSMa/C8eLQgm85Gw535v46h oJJcQF7aKnUJ8R6nsEsHcdj8H/HmDsbMSHkh1s4Z8Gt7hT2rbsZgW7K2JRDzb9ufbK/864dbCqb7I Bgux94E6ZTtMr7XINMAQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oxYIw-00BNQd-8J; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:47:34 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oxYIs-00BNOS-Nn for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:47:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA9461827; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AEDAC433D6; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:47:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1669142849; bh=taCJgh2lGd3ey1WtvG5t2JKi/c+/EKnirY02H77VRTQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ReMWDK5I5fpizL+H1Ds96fyTeZnnTiwTLmyv70GYOpJxoUBbsnQb84xZm7at0vrRn 1Zp7IT6dL2LzhtUAXExGMnSF7MXV2Lsx1NsNDYYQwv38Q/Xsq0bh163B+FH8NLTfut 2vC95yZnvo6eBdIHfHtHzxva0JmqAhJ7570945kCGk9PbZFEIhUPqauBf8wEYX646q mOb6gtJUsYmeXzfFWUG/Jv6SEgaB9Xpww7Fz4lvx5TSsbHVMvfBDyXHmohFKSgA1Gw PxF9BJYobNiFlJiVUxwjussygP/VBseGHy+L+F/t7Cha8DxRU/ojW0s9kGwPX8GSvq sY0rDisAx9aKw== Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:47:28 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Steen Hegelund Cc: "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , , Randy Dunlap , "Casper Andersson" , Russell King , Wan Jiabing , "Nathan Huckleberry" , , , , "Daniel Machon" , Horatiu Vultur , Lars Povlsen Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] Add support for VCAP debugFS in Sparx5 Message-ID: <20221122104728.7ef02606@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <994f72742a15bec5a93d57324b749b71d0709035.camel@microchip.com> References: <20221117213114.699375-1-steen.hegelund@microchip.com> <20221121110154.709bed49@kernel.org> <994f72742a15bec5a93d57324b749b71d0709035.camel@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221122_104730_821446_214F033F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:17:22 +0100 Steen Hegelund wrote: > > Have you checked devlink dpipe? On a quick scan it may be the right API > > to use here? Perhaps this was merged before people who know the code > > had a chance to take a look :( > > No I was not aware of the scope of devlink-dpipe, but it looks like the Sparx5 > VCAP feature would fit in. > > I need to take a closer look at the model and see if I can make ends meet, but > if so, then I could send support for devlink-dpipe at a later stage... SG. I don't feel strongly, maybe someone else does.. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel