From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE79DC4332F for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 09:50:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC :To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=k0vOqmjVmU+XCZgwNxnTAgHa3wpBKj/T3M8myk4ouhw=; b=n3CIRnvU23Tgqp FIItcD3o5abHK4crHz+hBGfMk2cJzcflVW4LLmbC1bkA2FYIiAz7LtDjpOLpEFfaea4ifRu5EEOWn 9x6fNY9h0EXyEicWLvk9bVkY/W/l5C2i2nb47GAsPkZH4bZB3S33LzOg69bfSBHyr+nCeUUGYDzZn 4lyhn/VyRHgpRu/5EfELJWwOQNREN78GxAwyj6Hwypt4WHPcLCglWO3FrtjazB4A9jG0bhWJksLmL d8oA8vbYhNnuGRVXk+Dj1vnMwgejjxZf+8cppLoQJqbpgjs40nD5OctxmZlCjVCxsYbcEax412B5E NkkklKVsqXDQpM0RA0Xg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oyroW-005NNH-GD; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 09:49:36 +0000 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oyrno-005N3h-3U for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 09:48:53 +0000 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NK6Nw0cDlzRpYp; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:48:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm600003.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.202) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:48:31 +0800 Received: from ubuntu1804.huawei.com (10.67.174.61) by kwepemm600003.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:48:30 +0800 From: Yang Jihong To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] bpf: Support kernel function call in 32-bit ARM Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:45:26 +0800 Message-ID: <20221126094530.226629-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.GIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.61] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To kwepemm600003.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.202) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221126_014852_522012_12B37D82 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.94 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org 1. Patch1 is dependent patch to fix zext extension error in 32-bit ARM. 2. Patch2 supports bpf fkunc in 32-bit ARM for EABI. 3. Patch3 is used to add test cases to cover some parameter scenarios states by AAPCS. 4. Patch4 fix a comment error. The following is the test_progs result in the 32-bit ARM environment: # uname -m armv7l # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # ./test_progs -t kfunc_call #1/1 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_fail:OK #1/2 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_null_fail:OK #1/3 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_rdonly:OK #1/4 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_use_after_free:OK #1/5 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_oob:OK #1/6 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_not_const:OK #1/7 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_mem_acquire_fail:OK #1/8 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test1:OK #1/9 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test2:OK #1/10 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test4:OK #1/11 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test5:OK #1/12 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test6:OK #1/13 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id:OK #1/14 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem:OK #1/15 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test:OK #1/16 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_null:OK #1/19 kfunc_call/destructive:OK --- Changes since v2: - Remove patches to adjust sk size check for CO_RE in 32-bit arch. - Add check of kfunc's return value in insn_def_regno. - Adjust is_reg64 for insn_def_regno. - The check of CONFIG_AEABI is moved from emit_kfunc_call to bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call. - Fix a comment error in fixup_kfunc_call. Yang Jihong (4): bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext extension bpf: Add kernel function call support in 32-bit ARM for EABI bpf:selftests: Add kfunc_call test for mixing 32-bit and 64-bit parameters bpf: Fix comment error in fixup_kfunc_call function arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++ kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 46 +++++- net/bpf/test_run.c | 18 +++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 3 + .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 52 +++++++ 5 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.30.GIT _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel