From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECBAAC4321E for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 00:18:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=WEA0eUFfk4AW21QcqqS5YIceuDaEYpnKpDErFCV/HeM=; b=INLMUS45gGgx5X D/xZ2uYUNZaQOydZbyrEiidTMFwKO3mLR+LbHeVWc4JcpRUNhtYQLFda4EzdwsHhNUb8ShxyKs9lT SMUI4CHiQQZ4nTn+/qRL3N9A06C3W73NmniNXSB9ITYimNJUN3lv6bn+5sv/EukNzDU7QdgkRqIwB LqRhjKVTY67vTi3tLEdCW3OlTksH+zleaNd9J59af9+yt3CBIdVCzgF45z2bSjlwT7e5KWaV+r2we pbeVqXdLLoaIEPp4E/6KO78x2dN4vpONRGvRmlii3raW4yfzbE0dTHv/nmhvqrXpKFS1+kosFjPiQ pscXq71yIDKjoA0EZaiw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p1GD2-001mdc-Vy; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:16:49 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p1GD0-001mcQ-37 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:16:47 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D2423A; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 16:16:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from slackpad.lan (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 299303F73B; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 16:16:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 00:14:57 +0000 From: Andre Przywara To: Samuel Holland Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Philipp Zabel , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] clk: sunxi-ng: Remove duplicate ARCH_SUNXI dependencies Message-ID: <20221203001439.64284671@slackpad.lan> In-Reply-To: <20221126191319.6404-2-samuel@sholland.org> References: <20221126191319.6404-1-samuel@sholland.org> <20221126191319.6404-2-samuel@sholland.org> Organization: Arm Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.31; x86_64-slackware-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221202_161646_261611_625020F2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.06 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 13:13:15 -0600 Samuel Holland wrote: Hi, thanks for addressing this! > SUNXI_CCU already depends on ARCH_SUNXI, so adding the dependency to > individual SoC drivers is redundant. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland > --- > > drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig | 43 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig > index 461537679c04..64cfa022e320 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig > @@ -14,43 +14,43 @@ config SUNIV_F1C100S_CCU > > config SUN20I_D1_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner D1 CCU" > - default RISCV && ARCH_SUNXI > - depends on (RISCV && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > + default RISCV > + depends on RISCV || COMPILE_TEST I agree on the "depends" part: Indeed the guard symbol already covers that, so it's redundant. However I am not so sure about the "default" part: When ARCH_SUNXI is deselected, but COMPILE_TEST in enabled, we default to every CCU driver being built-in. I am not sure this is the intention, or at least expected when doing compile testing? > > config SUN20I_D1_R_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner D1 PRCM CCU" > - default RISCV && ARCH_SUNXI > - depends on (RISCV && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > + default RISCV > + depends on RISCV || COMPILE_TEST > > config SUN50I_A64_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner A64 CCU" > - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI > - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > + default ARM64 > + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST I wonder if this "depends" line was always wrong and should be fixed: We can compile a 32-bit ARM kernel and run it on an A64. Granted this requires a special bootloader or a hacked U-Boot (tried that), and reveals some other issues with the decompressor, but technically there is no 64-bit dependency in here. The same goes for all the other ARM64 CCUs: Cortex-A53s can run AArch32 in all exception levels. So shall we just completely remove the "depends" line for those, and let SUNXI_CCU do that job? Or use use !RISCV || COMPILE_TEST? Cheers, Andre > > config SUN50I_A100_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner A100 CCU" > - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI > - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > + default ARM64 > + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST > > config SUN50I_A100_R_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner A100 PRCM CCU" > - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI > - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > + default ARM64 > + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST > > config SUN50I_H6_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner H6 CCU" > - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI > - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > + default ARM64 > + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST > > config SUN50I_H616_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner H616 CCU" > - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI > - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > + default ARM64 > + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST > > config SUN50I_H6_R_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner H6 and H616 PRCM CCU" > - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI > - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > + default ARM64 > + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST > > config SUN4I_A10_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner A10/A20 CCU" > @@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ config SUN6I_A31_CCU > > config SUN6I_RTC_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner H616/R329 RTC CCU" > - default ARCH_SUNXI > - depends on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST > + default y > > config SUN8I_A23_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner A23 CCU" > @@ -91,8 +90,8 @@ config SUN8I_A83T_CCU > > config SUN8I_H3_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner H3 CCU" > - default MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) > - depends on MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > + default MACH_SUN8I || ARM64 > + depends on MACH_SUN8I || ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST > > config SUN8I_V3S_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner V3s CCU" > @@ -101,7 +100,7 @@ config SUN8I_V3S_CCU > > config SUN8I_DE2_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner SoCs DE2 CCU" > - default MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) > + default MACH_SUN8I || ARM64 > > config SUN8I_R40_CCU > tristate "Support for the Allwinner R40 CCU" > @@ -115,6 +114,6 @@ config SUN9I_A80_CCU > > config SUN8I_R_CCU > tristate "Support for Allwinner SoCs' PRCM CCUs" > - default MACH_SUN8I || (ARCH_SUNXI && ARM64) > + default MACH_SUN8I || ARM64 > > endif _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel