From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
daniel.machon@microchip.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, lars.povlsen@microchip.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: lan966x: Add ptp trap rules
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 17:27:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221209152713.qmbnovdookrmzvkx@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221209153010.f4r577ilnlein77e@soft-dev3-1>
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 04:30:10PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> For example this rule:
> tc filter add dev eth0 ingress chain 8000000 prio 1 handle 1 protocol all
> flower skip_sw dst_mac 00:11:22:33:44:55/ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff action trap
> action goto chain 8100000
>
> This will not be hit until you add this rule:
> tc filter add dev eth0 ingress prio 1 handle 2 matchall skip_sw action goto chain 8000000
>
> Because this rule will enable the HW. Just to aligned to a SW
> implementation of the tc, we don't enable the vcap until there is a rule
> in chain 0 that has an action to go to chain 8000000 were it resides
> IS2 rules.
>
> So for example, on a fresh started lan966x the user will add the following
> rule:
> tc filter add dev eth0 ingress chain 8000000 prio 1 handle 1 protocol
> all flower skip_sw dst_mac 00:11:22:33:44:55/ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff action
> trap action goto chain 8100000
>
> He expects this rule not to be hit as there is no rule in chain 0. Now if
> PTP is started and it would enable vcap, then suddenly this rule may be
> hit.
Is it too restrictive to only allow adding offloaded filters to a chain
that has a valid goto towards it, coming (perhaps indirectly) from chain 0?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-09 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-03 10:43 [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: lan966x: Enable PTP on bridge interfaces Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-03 10:43 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] net: microchip: vcap: Add vcap_get_rule Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-06 12:31 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-12-07 8:30 ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-03 10:43 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] net: microchip: vcap: Add vcap_mod_rule Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-03 10:43 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: microchip: vcap: Add vcap_rule_get_key_u32 Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-03 10:43 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: lan966x: Add ptp trap rules Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-08 9:25 ` Michael Walle
2022-12-08 9:27 ` Michael Walle
2022-12-08 13:04 ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-08 13:18 ` Michael Walle
2022-12-09 9:29 ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 12:10 ` Michael Walle
2022-12-09 12:58 ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 12:56 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 14:05 ` Michael Walle
2022-12-09 14:14 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 14:20 ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 14:23 ` Michael Walle
2022-12-09 14:54 ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 14:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 14:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 14:57 ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 14:56 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 15:30 ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 15:27 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2022-12-09 23:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-12 14:27 ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-12 14:20 ` Horatiu Vultur
2023-01-05 15:09 ` Michael Walle
2023-01-05 21:55 ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-06 12:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: lan966x: Enable PTP on bridge interfaces patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221209152713.qmbnovdookrmzvkx@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox