From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Ludvig.Parsson@axis.com,
cristian.marussi@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] Rework SCMI initialization and probing sequence
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 18:50:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221222185049.737625-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
Hi,
under some configurations the SCMI core stack, which is now initialized
as a whole at the subsys_initcall level, can be dependent on some other
Kernel subsystems (like TEE) when some SCMI transport backend like optee
is used.
This has been reported to lead to some awkward probe loop which, even
though successful at the end, leaves a track of errors in the logs coming
directly from the core Linux driver model facilities.
In order to solve this issue and cleaning up a bit the SCMI stack startup
sequence, this small series reviews and reworks the SCMI core stack
initialization and probe logic.
Basically the SCMI Bus is split into its own module (scmi-core.ko) which is
initialized at subsys_initcall, while the SCMI core stack, including its
various transport backends (like optee, mailbox, virtio, smc), is kept into
a distinct module (scmi-module.ko) which get initialized at module_init.
The SCMI driver users initlevel, instead, remains unchanged at module_init.
No change is made to the Kconfig: the main ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL option will
now cause both modules to be built.
This allows the other possibly needed subsystems to be up and running
well before the core SCMI stack and its dependent transport backends, so
solving the reported issue.
Tested with SCMI transports mailbox/virtio and, in a previous draft, optee,
in a number of different load/unload/bind/unbind combinations both as
builtin and as LKMs.
Applies on v6.1.
Any feedback, testing welcome.
Thanks,
Cristian
Cristian Marussi (9):
firmware: arm_scmi: Simplify chan_available transport operation
firmware: arm_scmi: Use dedicated devices to initialize channels
firmware: arm_scmi: Move protocol registration helpers
firmware: arm_scmi: Add common notifier helpers
firmware: arm_scmi: Refactor protocol device creation
firmware: arm_scmi: Move handle get/set helpers
firmware: arm_scmi: Refactor device create/destroy helpers
firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce a new lifecycle for protocol devices
firmware: arm_scmi: Split bus and driver into distinct modules
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 8 +-
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c | 388 ++++++++++++-----
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 25 +-
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 623 ++++++++++++++--------------
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c | 6 +-
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 6 +-
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 6 +-
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/virtio.c | 4 +-
include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 5 -
9 files changed, 622 insertions(+), 449 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2022-12-22 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-22 18:50 Cristian Marussi [this message]
2022-12-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Simplify chan_available transport operation Cristian Marussi
2022-12-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Use dedicated devices to initialize channels Cristian Marussi
2022-12-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 3/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Move protocol registration helpers Cristian Marussi
2022-12-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 4/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add common notifier helpers Cristian Marussi
2022-12-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 5/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactor protocol device creation Cristian Marussi
2022-12-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 6/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Move handle get/set helpers Cristian Marussi
2022-12-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 7/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactor device create/destroy helpers Cristian Marussi
2022-12-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 8/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce a new lifecycle for protocol devices Cristian Marussi
2022-12-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 9/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Split bus and driver into distinct modules Cristian Marussi
2022-12-23 5:36 ` [PATCH 0/9] Rework SCMI initialization and probing sequence Sumit Garg
2022-12-23 11:37 ` Cristian Marussi
2022-12-26 13:54 ` Sumit Garg
2023-01-19 19:31 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221222185049.737625-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=Ludvig.Parsson@axis.com \
--cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox