linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Only return attributes from stage2_update_leaf_attrs()
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:02:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230111000300.2034799-4-oliver.upton@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230111000300.2034799-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>

Returning a single PTE from stage2_update_leaf_attrs() doesn't make a
great deal of sense given that the function could be used to apply a
change to a range of PTEs. Instead, return a bitwise OR of attributes
from all the visited PTEs.

As the walker is no longer returning the full PTE, drop the check for a
valid PTE in kvm_age_gfn().

Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c         |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index 26f61462527d..a3d599e3af60 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size)
 struct stage2_attr_data {
 	kvm_pte_t			attr_set;
 	kvm_pte_t			attr_clr;
-	kvm_pte_t			pte;
+	kvm_pte_t			attr_old;
 	u32				level;
 };
 
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static int stage2_attr_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
 		return 0;
 
 	data->level = ctx->level;
-	data->pte = pte;
+	data->attr_old |= pte & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTRS;
 	pte &= ~data->attr_clr;
 	pte |= data->attr_set;
 
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ static int stage2_attr_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
 	 * but worst-case the access flag update gets lost and will be
 	 * set on the next access instead.
 	 */
-	if (data->pte != pte) {
+	if (ctx->old != pte) {
 		/*
 		 * Invalidate instruction cache before updating the guest
 		 * stage-2 PTE if we are going to add executable permission.
@@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@ static int stage2_attr_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
 
 static int stage2_update_leaf_attrs(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr,
 				    u64 size, kvm_pte_t attr_set,
-				    kvm_pte_t attr_clr, kvm_pte_t *orig_pte,
+				    kvm_pte_t attr_clr, kvm_pte_t *attr_old,
 				    u32 *level, enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flags)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -1041,11 +1041,12 @@ static int stage2_update_leaf_attrs(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	if (orig_pte)
-		*orig_pte = data.pte;
+	if (attr_old)
+		*attr_old = data.attr_old;
 
 	if (level)
 		*level = data.level;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1058,32 +1059,33 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_wrprotect(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size)
 
 kvm_pte_t kvm_pgtable_stage2_mkyoung(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr)
 {
-	kvm_pte_t pte = 0;
+	kvm_pte_t attr_old = 0;
+
 	stage2_update_leaf_attrs(pgt, addr, 1, KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF, 0,
-				 &pte, NULL, 0);
+				 &attr_old, NULL, 0);
 	dsb(ishst);
-	return pte;
+	return attr_old;
 }
 
 kvm_pte_t kvm_pgtable_stage2_mkold(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr)
 {
-	kvm_pte_t pte = 0;
+	kvm_pte_t attr_old = 0;
 	stage2_update_leaf_attrs(pgt, addr, 1, 0, KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF,
-				 &pte, NULL, 0);
+				 &attr_old, NULL, 0);
 	/*
 	 * "But where's the TLBI?!", you scream.
 	 * "Over in the core code", I sigh.
 	 *
 	 * See the '->clear_flush_young()' callback on the KVM mmu notifier.
 	 */
-	return pte;
+	return attr_old;
 }
 
 bool kvm_pgtable_stage2_is_young(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr)
 {
-	kvm_pte_t pte = 0;
-	stage2_update_leaf_attrs(pgt, addr, 1, 0, 0, &pte, NULL, 0);
-	return pte & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF;
+	kvm_pte_t attr_old = 0;
+	stage2_update_leaf_attrs(pgt, addr, 1, 0, 0, &attr_old, NULL, 0);
+	return attr_old & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF;
 }
 
 int kvm_pgtable_stage2_relax_perms(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 31d7fa4c7c14..0741f3a8ddca 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1618,7 +1618,7 @@ bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
 	kpte = kvm_pgtable_stage2_mkold(kvm->arch.mmu.pgt,
 					range->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
 	pte = __pte(kpte);
-	return pte_valid(pte) && pte_young(pte);
+	return pte_young(pte);
 }
 
 bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
-- 
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-11  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-11  0:02 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Handle unaligned memslots in kvm_(test_)_age_gfn() Oliver Upton
2023-01-11  0:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Hoist S2 PTE definitions into kvm_pgtable.h Oliver Upton
2023-01-11  0:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm64: Add a mask for all leaf PTE attributes Oliver Upton
2023-01-11  0:02 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2023-01-11  8:52   ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Only return attributes from stage2_update_leaf_attrs() Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11 17:21     ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-02 22:08       ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-07 14:56         ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11  0:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle page aging notifiers for unaligned memlsot Oliver Upton
2023-01-12 15:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11  0:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Consistently use KVM's types/helpers in kvm_age_gfn() Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230111000300.2034799-4-oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).