From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8704CC00A5A for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 03:44:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=TE+rMFBMFbVKEeG7Se0BYloc2JE2ymMPl6IxTEfRYig=; b=NTfFs+qQ58dGQQ Bq5qA/PWPEpwMm3CELPWp9MgJpF1cUzJFd3E/sLBcPC6mKGiz+lxTG2lum+M8FfGVDmXzCj14hwaE 76BHcEF0juTcgUsWLt3be5KLq8udhzPIHZhoAUiZgZRoTKdyMabB1v+bhAYuZBkVGBYlGIIUu6kk/ B/EzElO9f1dETgo9/t1ith0bbvFnW/b5b7SOHIPXYL5VU3+GoJG7hc432EutEcq5iXbijK5SGaBj9 +D+ntRHB4MRdeVc+iGl8hH6Ro0USQuk1xdOBP+dxxYgZA6bLuxnvb9Q6oMwbAcZE0XgrHS5dEoCVv 0XGzw9pOwy7PMOYXOVTA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pHzMg-00GnG2-AA; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 03:43:54 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pHzMd-00GnFP-5U for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 03:43:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BEDA61615; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 03:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C289C433EF; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 03:43:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1674013429; bh=0ILKWOlamb3ppN+hUK/M6c0wITie324WG6pz/EbdT6w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NPsKqjHLBwdy9unr2PXkGQacLhWf7BFNap8y4qq9e4QGG7oeu/SN/zX5wOn/EOvIA GtbQKRKzvRoBXVxCkF1wuM1Z9UFf+xiMcRCLRX+irBD7moeyATxYDQxM8o8LG90RsU LuRgjYgoeRZklfmX+3AkxNglQHoPsXi/7VPAGoZUEbkOxs4bPtQvWldXuG7/WeFXNH IlSbbK5QBcNuoVeyIEhogIgb/wTEMgxEEiRDSVZE0//ZeadXVDS4C5MMo0wA7ArMS/ vYj8W2oydlT7PsD4LhdmZrQwpXFgqtyRWyIsUYYVvwgOr9NRGpr2QjAKnM8NQgLsr9 3A4TxqRgfHmoA== Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 19:43:48 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Andrew Halaney Cc: davem@davemloft.net, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ning Cai Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: enable all safety features by default Message-ID: <20230117194348.3f098a18@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230116193722.50360-1-ahalaney@redhat.com> References: <20230116193722.50360-1-ahalaney@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230117_194351_271558_79E4596C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.67 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:37:23 -0600 Andrew Halaney wrote: > I've been working on a newer Qualcomm platform (sa8540p-ride) which has > a variant of dwmac5 in it. This patch is something Ning stumbled on when > adding some support for it downstream, and has been in my queue as I try > and get some support ready for review on list upstream. > > Since it isn't really related to the particular hardware I decided to > pop it on list now. Please let me know if instead of enabling by default > (which the original implementation did and is why I went that route) a > message like "Safety features detected but not enabled in software" is > preferred and platforms are skipped unless they opt-in for enablement. Could you repost and CC Wong Vee Khee, and maybe some other Intel folks who have been touching stmmac recently? They are probably the best to comment / review. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel