From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37E9CC38142 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:12:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=UxyohEjwRdQkapgPD5jepKhpeim/+cERdZ888QJNOtE=; b=HIpcwPsIpQJSR1 +NQ2l03nhV26fE6z/AvnLa7HP0B7s60HCqNPHS39gT1lVtWZb+HtU3wbQXc4PRF/tfQ8NiFZyBEBd ZBEQJ57CXsM4F1/i/jZTDxVdymCECbZpWFEoyKHtPX8OhN6U3IofkVl17TPeLmdcapqxmgVO5mKz6 dRUMQeIeD1aGVk7Kd54E9ii7K+vtgYVwAGRwkOMNrcihDy/KL5SQ/O0oBTNc8qZZ66Ff2KlgbRf8g qSsmTmQpRHVfLWlPmKK3rzwGah18QAHhCdrKd93QWxDuP0/4rShr1fTlSirbCV6f/U8PQ2nBS7SDv EE5XQjCNGdPWoYLFmYMA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pKKxa-004SpL-3F; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:11:42 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pKKxU-004Soa-NL; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:11:38 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B1F4B3; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 07:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FE4F3F5A1; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 07:11:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:11:28 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Conor Dooley Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Sudeep Holla , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Yong-Xuan Wang , ALKML , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Pierre Gondois Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] cacheinfo/arch_topology: Updates for v6.3 Message-ID: <20230124151128.4d57tpkuahaw2kex@bogus> References: <20230120121856.1407369-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20230124144245.ddphvqbcxpzrlgek@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230124_071136_821796_67B7CB92 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.42 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:54:29PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:42:45PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:44:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > Hi Sudeep, > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 1:22 PM Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > It has been tested on RISC-V which is the main users outside of arm64. > > > > > > Has it? > > > > > > > Hmm, I might have mixed up things then. I was on a vacation for quite some > > time and might have assumed Conor response on the thread with testing. > > Extremely sorry for that. However it was in -next for few days before > > Greg applied to his tree. > > Sorry chief! The CI stuff we run on the RISC-V patchwork only provides > build coverage etc & my CI against linux-next doesn't check for this kind > of thing. No worries, it was holiday hang over from my side. I did check and repond to the other thread during holiday and then mixed up things, my bad. Sorry for that. > I'll put it on my todo-list to add that, both for patchwork and in our > internal CI. Thanks. > I only reviewed the patch that was moving the code to common group and > not the others unfortunately. Next time I'll be sure to review the lot! > Also I really hope we don't have to change this much but who knows. I thought so few years back yet we are changing it so much in the recent days. Hope that will enter quiescent state soon ;) yet again. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel