Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: mt7530: don't change PVC_EG_TAG when CPU port becomes VLAN-aware

Paolo Abeni
2023-02-07T18:08:31Z

On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 14:39 +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 11:56:13AM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Thank you Vladimir for the quick turn-around!
> >
> > For future case, please avoid replying with new patches - tag area
> > included - to existing patch/thread, as it confuses tag propagation,
> > thanks!
>
> Ah, yes, I see (and thanks for fixing it up).
>
> Although I need to ask, since I think I made legitimate use of the tools
> given to me. What should I have done instead? Post an RFC patch (even
> though I didn't know whether it worked or not) in a thread separate to
> the debugging session? I didn't want to diverge from the thread reporting
> the issue. Maybe we should have started a new thread, decoupled from the
> patch?

Here what specifically confused the bot were the additional tags
present in the debug patch. One possible alternative would have been
posting - in the same thread - the code of the tentative patch without
the formal commit message/tag area.

That option is quite convenient toome, as writing the changelog takes
me a measurable amount of time and I could spend that effort only when
the patch is finalize/tested.

Please let me know if the above makes sense to you.

Cheers,

Paolo