From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B199FC05027 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:14:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=si6jCYNEtYtfEX3Z07yyvFPxuRYmnKSAal7t72SDLmk=; b=kI8sdsPOeEuEIh yWH8QmohK4/U0wNYw6CX26CtNrSpCh7O1jXEqSaOg3awlD/3kOeTwnHcjO5PO5ocpZkyKYuAF4NKh nvzX3okcukSZ7ZoNMbXOH9Id8P8/l/hyuDkdsayQ1uK0AT9bS7Tt5fGgaADHiPBB4pHStJDWM8vTc tkzV33ZT7R7fyHIg1g9DXgnTeMb5iDG/OvC5MKITu7YmC5Gz7wNetassXkzGzaEgIo9Qso3VfEWBV fUZ/RHrcpBA3uFQihaN5yGFRE4+qacXDeVBUHj3cbPkmwaCTO8I3aqjiLYbzsex8J5dWSok2Bt8Yq U3qr03q6HK0KnIb3h8Ug==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pQXtn-006rc7-AB; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:13:27 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pQXtk-006raj-9w for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:13:25 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0E1461E52; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90E21C433EF; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:13:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1676052803; bh=6FLDH++aUj095WH9otN0bkobiJlSDQziX4LlJjA4wS4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OBeovfgBitTlBAxZHZpmc5RTctjYTaEPJRtQRt9AvYMQm79B2inSL2GCVqGCNRThH uv6ZV5NIrYKBg1+2+8prF8TmMOpdfezRGuXAkz8fEki6YKNfYEgQsrVy4DcI/tlxqp BjPhcwp6vQgLawKj8Ly+E/Ov7p2zGAok4V94flhRydi9R2Egj6Sf6g/jAVQJW0ZVo5 cJoC2H2enzXbF7VRM7BZfUXTIjCQRtMOzFdO1qG+m5YKLLg6dWRjl1YKw05SSM+Ew4 JgenQnvyNc+qu3vklc1eq/zqASHpAUXRSN8u5zXM1BZ+wZosIxSXf1FRTcsMOiXuz9 xuTk5ILD8DMEg== Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:13:20 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Alain Volmat Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Jonathan Corbet , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Thomas Gleixner , Marc Zyngier , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Russell King , Patrice Chotard , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Maxime Coquelin , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Amit Kucheria , Zhang Rui , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Philipp Zabel , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: removal of STiH415/STiH416 remainings bits Message-ID: <20230210101320.331c1d95@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230209091659.1409-1-avolmat@me.com> <20230210090420.GB175687@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230210_101324_417101_15B15E6D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.19 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:12:25 +0100 Alain Volmat wrote: > Having seen situations like that for some other series I was guessing > that each maintainer would apply the relevant patches on his side. > Those two platforms being no more used, there is no specific patch > ordering to keep. > > I've actually been wondering at the beginning how should I post those > patches. If another way is preferrable I can post again differently > if that helps. You'd have most luck getting the changes accepted for 6.3 if you split this up and resend to individual maintainers. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel