From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2831C761A6 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:16:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=HMbG5ZkaNbQgbgvvB+CWT5/iKEzKNzGOnlgtyhgvmeM=; b=DRUmjONvvhIlUe mL9yWL2+idduVd1o6yLqDxEwq4NzRdVWGi2s3g7Im8/+TzC7bMDdmCXBS0kL6FBc6BhF2KDlW67y/ JysT54FBieSPgiJsnnbJSV9X6NW2hVH+KK5/malw7IAbaYQlyJoJTLKz06e23dzAztxroQjYimiuA eJ9DFSfE3rNuHTxFAP1L4KOmL+gzqtM+Vl2ObppqK5ckaYi4l1+lr2QC0cIxHZ+aqndwH7TIjFP/d vcimz4VWMkC4AEu2+PmFSJwJjiGIBDJC4n3OOCpcQQvTG6CsFlkHjRAkCSUGFRMnN6EhojmFkCglA Xez3he98AE6eZ1/xGi+w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pht47-003zTA-2G; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:15:47 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pht44-003zR3-2c; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:15:46 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53FACE2760; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D04B9C433EF; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:15:26 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Donglin Peng , mhiramat@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org, zhangqing@loongson.cn, kernel@xen0n.name, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, xiehuan09@gmail.com, dinghui@sangfor.com.cn, huangcun@sangfor.com.cn, dolinux.peng@gmail.com, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] function_graph: Support recording and printing the return value of function Message-ID: <20230330101526.2c862a42@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20230330135948.GCZCWV1O/IjsxsBmN8@fat_crate.local> References: <20230330135948.GCZCWV1O/IjsxsBmN8@fat_crate.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230330_071545_019759_BE0816A3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.60 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:59:48 +0200 Borislav Petkov wrote: > Please control your spamming: > > From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > > Don't get discouraged - or impatient > ------------------------------------ > > After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait. Reviewers are > busy people and may not get to your patch right away. > > Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment, > but the development process works more smoothly than that now. You should > receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure > that you have sent your patches to the right place. Wait for a minimum of > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > busy times like merge windows. To be fair, this isn't a ping or a resend. It's addressing comments that were given in v8 that was sent out on Tuesday. This isn't v1, where I would agree with waiting a week for comments. v1 was sent back in 3/6. I do not expect (nor want) someone to wait a week on v8 for all feedback to come in, unless it was a redesign of the code. But it's now starting to settle, and that "week waiting" period isn't necessary for fixing up minor suggestions by the reviewers. I was hoping this would be good to go by the end of the week, so I could get it into linux-next by next week. -- Steve _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel