From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55861C76196 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:09:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ZvlFu5zdmn5JSZHV/jBQbpfJ6UzOZh/ZF6GuqHyz7Tg=; b=dRzIAa49J1cgnp Rs+SsN1NpP8XVaqfCrt8ulfOvCE96nNP3qX/ETgc03uW4ybl3oyqEDGC9NAZC+a98wXrgulqzGKGD kPgxbWlVlS/CaBWvV5zsHgEXViVh6HhST+fyGefZ4focKZ294sUVuTlZIrT05TZl8BSln/VGu15NW +kDieVfbFuQC8kpjgFhVz2lK0SWtiNIhEzfw0lrWAGjWMBlhnPdsXW2F9f48xluvKgfSYkSuqhPWA ERA/t4iVs99i+hau89vZsxATuZ0/SVQN2LauM6RBNXE2L2xAdfkGpcQn+ivflh5x3BEWS6I4qKq9S jm0AGrRkRpgae7Hvq5Eg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pkT6S-0085Q7-2x; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 17:08:52 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pkT6P-0085PH-2H for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 17:08:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E75A964888; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9CBEC433EF; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:08:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1680800928; bh=1B1sR1zgH1Xw7J4RVXwXydm6RpI/xuxwQ0JKdZa9ZfM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wJTj3+bpSdYGnEZdPQ24xH1ZlnIUwErVNzn8xF0c2H/eorEakxi/FWD9BM1Ba1PoL hXZ/veihjgi0oxxvQQOVmZNjTEz5+K2k1QZt4SwwLTdywEnkVz/0bdXgB+hLQwbEEF YPbpZQFV10T6m8wAIk3VpSBqFwn66yObRxEeTqxM= Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:08:45 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Yicong Yang , Mark Rutland , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, Dan Williams , Shaokun Zhang , Jiucheng Xu , Khuong Dinh , Robert Richter , Atish Patra , Anup Patel , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Frank Li , Shuai Xue , Vineet Gupta , Shawn Guo , Fenghua Yu , Dave Jiang , Wu Hao , Tom Rix , linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose , Liang Kan Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] perf: Allow a PMU to have a parent Message-ID: <2023040610-morbidly-supermom-e81c@gregkh> References: <20230404134225.13408-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <20230404134225.13408-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <61f8e489-ae76-38d6-2da0-43cf3c17853d@huawei.com> <20230406111607.00007be5@Huawei.com> <20230406124040.GD392176@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20230406174445.0000235c@Huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230406174445.0000235c@Huawei.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230406_100849_786015_54FFAB99 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.87 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 05:44:45PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 14:40:40 +0200 > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 11:16:07AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > In the long run I agree it would be good. Short term there are more instances of > > > struct pmu that don't have parents than those that do (even after this series). > > > We need to figure out what to do about those before adding checks on it being > > > set. > > > > Right, I don't think you've touched *any* of the x86 PMUs for example, > > and getting everybody that boots an x86 kernel a warning isn't going to > > go over well :-) > > > > It was tempting :) "Warning: Parentless PMU: try a different architecture." > > I'd love some inputs on what the x86 PMU devices parents should be? > CPU counters in general tend to just spin out of deep in the architecture code. > > My overall favorite is an l2 cache related PMU that is spun up in > arch/arm/kernel/irq.c init_IRQ() > > I'm just not going to try and figure out why... Why not change the api to force a parent to be passed in? And if one isn't, we make it a "virtual" device and throw it in the class for them? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel