From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D203C77B6F for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:04:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=G/gfFdB/aiqM0TpxgsBxOQeGd/dYCvtrD1srAB5WCYw=; b=TO8Jc7gM5oXdTd 1NDkrycfnPT1wZIH6ytQuROCa29VYvQ1qkXJOWd88UA28KHBp9bZ9tp67n7wbHheueCQxs3AjOheb HfvM9ExHAesJ3iQld1hefmsSrkNlLoH54tJPjV160XsxRfZoQhIH1ujBPgGAURihdsgHbgJWaNuOt M23zW7v34+PVmPOwakYacyNrCTfPaPYW/5DKfzPhM3ogW3c3Ap+DcKiLGmXyXldYNT499nUxqk8Li u1xtpi5Z/Uld6Vvq8QKnNcu1kF0NATWApT7RAxvZtOUxfj5oHgH+iez5oITKXLdVd03Av+BrEplf7 Jf7ZZwQaINnkJkL4Mx2A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pmFWs-000L3R-0K; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:03:30 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pmFWp-000L2z-26 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:03:28 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 304AC61361; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0040C433EF; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:03:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1681225406; bh=9O8piP4byfbI2oKaqDdxrpLi1xAscXVAg7UF/bvC1oA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=djLKARAKOGjPCQQoGhKXq1rXpba5LAAtAXRM903h4oSJrNFMKicjNikZXcPfgpE1u o+f9hhDfJNCwudxBugw1iXyD7i75XKK9+bUKGAffCVjorJ7uYlR7w8ExFNPF1Hg+yb zjmENUZ+/+DQZLTnGmWCEPVMh4vOcSA4OeHbBm3sM2svyaDdrKzQgtANBVC44kiIlT vPFKIf91gK0psHrFvwQVZyDMtLSIa09iyFyK/zpO0vkTsTVBGlXBfvqC2MlwlFYfLs +aNqIlL3bwpxxKj8+BFiDeoTdqdGLIRCoXl83p5p2jXYGW6ciL99nAVajn6tPe/TKi 3FD6B6YgNRc+Q== Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:03:21 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Brown Cc: Shuah Khan , paulmck@kernel.org, Willy Tarreau , Shuah Khan , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tools/nolibc/stdio: Implement vprintf() Message-ID: <20230411150320.GA23045@willie-the-truck> References: <20230405-kselftest-nolibc-v2-0-2ac2495814b5@kernel.org> <20230405-kselftest-nolibc-v2-1-2ac2495814b5@kernel.org> <9dfb88e8-2a61-47a8-876e-581e4c717217@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9dfb88e8-2a61-47a8-876e-581e4c717217@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230411_080327_726377_C6D7153E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.34 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:31:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:30:04PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 4/6/23 12:43, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > Alternatively, if it would be more convenient for Mark to send this > > > up via kselftest: > > > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney > > > > It currently merges cleanly with the -rcu tree's dev branch, so this > > > should not be a problem. > > > > Either way, please let me know, Mark! > > > I can take these through kselftest or can go through arm64 > > > Acked-by: Shuah Khan > > It seems like more of a kselftest change than anything else so probably > makes sense for it to go that way? The example user isn't really even > needed. Fine by me, as long as it doesn't conflict with any other arm64 selftest changes you hope to land for 6.4. Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel