Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: watchdog: drop duplicated GPIO watchdog bindings

Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: watchdog: drop duplicated GPIO watchdog bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/04/2023 18:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 4/15/23 02:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Two conversions to DT schema of GPIO watchdog binding happened and came
>> through different trees.  Merge them into one:
>> 1. Combine maintainers,
>> 2. Use more descriptive property descriptions and constraints from
>>     gpio-wdt.yaml,
>> 3. Switch to unevaluatedProperties:false, to allow generic watchdog
>>     properties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> 
> For the series:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> 
> On a side note, the e-mail addresses in patchwork are messed up for
> patches sent by you. As result, I can not reply to your e-mails after
> pulling a patch from patchwork. This means that some replies get lost
> if I did not keep the original e-mail.
> 
> That is how it looks like after I pull one of your patches from patchwork:
> 
> To:
> +=?unknown-8bit?q?Wim_Van_Sebroeck_=3Cwim=40linux-watchdog=2Eorg=3E=2C_Gu?==?unknown-8bit?q?enter_Roeck_=3Clinux=40roeck-us=2Enet=3E=2C_Rob_Herring_?==?unknown-8bit?q?=3Crobh+dt=40kernel=2Eorg=3E=2C_Krzysztof_Kozlowski_=3Ckrz?==?unknown-8bit?q?yszt

(Trimmed cc list)

Thanks for letting me know, I wonder what's the problem. I am sending
with send-email exactly the same way every day, but somehow this series
have such header in Patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/patch/20230415095112.51257-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Which I do not see in:
1. lore:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230415095112.51257-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

2. Previous patches on Patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/patch/20230310223012.315897-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Lore (1 above) points to possible unescaped UTF character for
rafal@milecki.pl, but I wonder why send-email did not handle it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: watchdog: drop duplicated GPIO watchdog bindings

[Rob Herring]

On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 07:26:27PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/04/2023 18:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 4/15/23 02:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Two conversions to DT schema of GPIO watchdog binding happened and came
> >> through different trees.  Merge them into one:
> >> 1. Combine maintainers,
> >> 2. Use more descriptive property descriptions and constraints from
> >>     gpio-wdt.yaml,
> >> 3. Switch to unevaluatedProperties:false, to allow generic watchdog
> >>     properties.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > 
> > 
> > For the series:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > 
> > On a side note, the e-mail addresses in patchwork are messed up for
> > patches sent by you. As result, I can not reply to your e-mails after
> > pulling a patch from patchwork. This means that some replies get lost
> > if I did not keep the original e-mail.
> > 
> > That is how it looks like after I pull one of your patches from patchwork:
> > 
> > To:
> > +=?unknown-8bit?q?Wim_Van_Sebroeck_=3Cwim=40linux-watchdog=2Eorg=3E=2C_Gu?==?unknown-8bit?q?enter_Roeck_=3Clinux=40roeck-us=2Enet=3E=2C_Rob_Herring_?==?unknown-8bit?q?=3Crobh+dt=40kernel=2Eorg=3E=2C_Krzysztof_Kozlowski_=3Ckrz?==?unknown-8bit?q?yszt
> 
> (Trimmed cc list)
> 
> Thanks for letting me know, I wonder what's the problem. I am sending
> with send-email exactly the same way every day, but somehow this series
> have such header in Patchwork:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/patch/20230415095112.51257-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
> 
> Which I do not see in:
> 1. lore:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230415095112.51257-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
> 
> 2. Previous patches on Patchwork:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/patch/20230310223012.315897-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
> 
> Lore (1 above) points to possible unescaped UTF character for
> rafal@milecki.pl, but I wonder why send-email did not handle it.

Looks to me like Content-Type header is missing. Usually, I get a prompt 
from git-send-email with what encoding to use if it needs to use UTF8.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel