From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: mm: pass original fault address to handle_mm_fault() in PER_VMA_LOCK block
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 21:12:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230524131238.2791-1-jszhang@kernel.org> (raw)
When reading the arm64's PER_VMA_LOCK support code, I found a bit
difference between arm64 and other arch when calling handle_mm_fault()
during VMA lock-based page fault handling: the fault address is masked
before passing to handle_mm_fault(). This is also different from the
usage in mmap_lock-based handling. I think we need to pass the
original fault address to handle_mm_fault() as we did in
commit 84c5e23edecd ("arm64: mm: Pass original fault address to
handle_mm_fault()").
If we go through the code path further, we can find that the "masked"
fault address can cause mismatched fault address between perf sw
major/minor page fault sw event and perf page fault sw event:
do_page_fault
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, ..., addr) // orig addr
handle_mm_fault
mm_account_fault
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ, ...) // masked addr
Fixes: cd7f176aea5f ("arm64/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first")
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index cb21ccd7940d..6045a5117ac1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -600,8 +600,7 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr,
vma_end_read(vma);
goto lock_mmap;
}
- fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, addr & PAGE_MASK,
- mm_flags | FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK, regs);
+ fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, addr, mm_flags | FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK, regs);
vma_end_read(vma);
if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY)) {
--
2.40.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-24 13:12 Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2023-05-24 13:26 ` [PATCH] arm64: mm: pass original fault address to handle_mm_fault() in PER_VMA_LOCK block Jisheng Zhang
2023-05-24 14:39 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-05-25 7:00 ` Anshuman Khandual
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-24 13:13 Jisheng Zhang
2023-05-25 17:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-06-02 12:33 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230524131238.2791-1-jszhang@kernel.org \
--to=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).