From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>,
Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: fractional-divider: Improve approximation when zero based
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 15:34:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230529133433.56215-1-frank@oltmanns.dev> (raw)
Consider the CLK_FRAC_DIVIDER_ZERO_BASED flag when finding the best
approximation for m and n. By doing so, increase the range of valid
values for the numerator and denominator by 1.
Cc: A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
---
I stumpled upon this, when familiarizing myself with clk drivers. Unfortunately,
I have no boards to test this patch. It seems the only user of this flag in
mainline is drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-7ulp.c, therefore I'm cc-ing
get_maintainers.pl --git-blame -f drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-7ulp.c
in the hopes of a wider audience.
Thank you for considering this contribution,
Frank
drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c
index 479297763e70..7da21cd2bdb1 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ void clk_fractional_divider_general_approximation(struct clk_hw *hw,
unsigned long *m, unsigned long *n)
{
struct clk_fractional_divider *fd = to_clk_fd(hw);
+ unsigned long max_m, max_n;
/*
* Get rate closer to *parent_rate to guarantee there is no overflow
@@ -138,9 +139,15 @@ void clk_fractional_divider_general_approximation(struct clk_hw *hw,
rate <<= scale - fd->nwidth;
}
- rational_best_approximation(rate, *parent_rate,
- GENMASK(fd->mwidth - 1, 0), GENMASK(fd->nwidth - 1, 0),
- m, n);
+ if (fd->flags & CLK_FRAC_DIVIDER_ZERO_BASED) {
+ max_m = 1 << fd->mwidth;
+ max_n = 1 << fd->nwidth;
+ } else {
+ max_m = GENMASK(fd->mwidth - 1, 0);
+ max_n = GENMASK(fd->nwidth - 1, 0);
+ }
+
+ rational_best_approximation(rate, *parent_rate, max_m, max_n, m, n);
}
static long clk_fd_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
@@ -169,13 +176,18 @@ static int clk_fd_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
{
struct clk_fractional_divider *fd = to_clk_fd(hw);
unsigned long flags = 0;
- unsigned long m, n;
+ unsigned long m, n, max_m, max_n;
u32 mmask, nmask;
u32 val;
- rational_best_approximation(rate, parent_rate,
- GENMASK(fd->mwidth - 1, 0), GENMASK(fd->nwidth - 1, 0),
- &m, &n);
+ if (fd->flags & CLK_FRAC_DIVIDER_ZERO_BASED) {
+ max_m = 1 << fd->mwidth;
+ max_n = 1 << fd->nwidth;
+ } else {
+ max_m = GENMASK(fd->mwidth - 1, 0);
+ max_n = GENMASK(fd->nwidth - 1, 0);
+ }
+ rational_best_approximation(rate, parent_rate, max_m, max_n, &m, &n);
if (fd->flags & CLK_FRAC_DIVIDER_ZERO_BASED) {
m--;
--
2.40.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2023-05-29 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-29 13:34 Frank Oltmanns [this message]
2023-06-12 21:39 ` [PATCH] clk: fractional-divider: Improve approximation when zero based Stephen Boyd
2023-06-13 8:40 ` Frank Oltmanns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230529133433.56215-1-frank@oltmanns.dev \
--to=frank@oltmanns.dev \
--cc=Anson.Huang@nxp.com \
--cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).