From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75049C77B7A for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:08:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=IlB2jpAnUEob48DOcpHwcOZkSg4YLSwTrAYKIMKIE2w=; b=m6g+FIvJ2jUiU9 TzvgwMobMV53Le/OMNxVDcZBpTZV2SJ73ef8g+vD5UfU+UppbRIs4FpQb3sZHx9o/XTzUvhMxbrgR 2VDJ1S0iE5sU1A0oTniY/VNpfCVdN/exj6IiVB8u8FyWKGGHhTpxpO53meCCXejs1UE1WR1zRze09 ZUcumeMzVdwXuAN8tOHzEcMxO8YccUfx9Q4lOaS4cFdu0DPgbVNbCtHQTHrNQVQappx9FCPoU9oxG uxx9Ip7rv12rlb9ZhJQ1LVnbWFTH+yI522CoVrjIL5JeZd59p1cOFhNWOaaanlssFzsFe4YoqDJzB 3f4SAtf5HghbzDbbv2PA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q4g9p-003AeE-2L; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 11:07:53 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q4g9n-003Acd-03; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 11:07:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D0C64340; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A781FC433D2; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:07:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1685617670; bh=+Yjm8puKI4qcOhrAjHQoPXnOlN6+/fj9nQ2KMrVKq+A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RhP2k+/FQSvli7tGw2eOKlboTIMhAX1rWIMmQojkSItsf7Pbu27Voz4XKQfKsJMv+ yk64a7+GnLa0AXm5NTg7oxgCbiU/vvM5YtvO42iXWm3c1dvWeuqaT9QYECD04AjLI8 +kurm3Gcj765DCLAHDCbNzTJmkHWERuX8j+NWUQrH79TGx2XeQSd0dO1NOebia9EMt dJu6ZE7ylH9284d9jqvK6St/2YUkHNw8jD2OIGo2TbwtTLSoShdT9QABDGhevJVWTD pUczYlcvfwWLpOJgcn012xrthp2r+mfy68euX8CFvo6UC393XjO1m9JQnHYF6C6kEn C9f6ivmZ7x+Ew== Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:07:13 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , "David S. Miller" , Dinh Nguyen , Heiko Carstens , Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Kent Overstreet , Luis Chamberlain , Michael Ellerman , "Naveen N. Rao" , Palmer Dabbelt , Russell King , Song Liu , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX Message-ID: <20230601110713.GE395338@kernel.org> References: <20230601101257.530867-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20230601101257.530867-13-rppt@kernel.org> <20230601103050.GT4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230601103050.GT4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230601_040751_137124_AC155A61 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:30:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > +static void __init_or_module do_text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len) > > +{ > > + if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) { > > + text_poke_early(addr, opcode, len); > > + } else { > > + mutex_lock(&text_mutex); > > + text_poke(addr, opcode, len); > > + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); > > + } > > +} > > So I don't much like do_text_poke(); why? I believe the idea was to keep memcpy for early boot before the kernel image is protected without going and adding if (is_module_text_address()) all over the place. I think this can be used instead without updating all the call sites of text_poke_early(): diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c index 91057de8e6bc..f994e63e9903 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c @@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ void __init_or_module text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, * code cannot be running and speculative code-fetches are * prevented. Just change the code. */ - memcpy(addr, opcode, len); + text_poke_copy(addr, opcode, len); } else { local_irq_save(flags); memcpy(addr, opcode, len); > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c > > index aa99536b824c..d50595f2c1a6 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c > > @@ -118,10 +118,13 @@ ftrace_modify_code_direct(unsigned long ip, const char *old_code, > > return ret; > > > > /* replace the text with the new text */ > > - if (ftrace_poke_late) > > + if (ftrace_poke_late) { > > text_poke_queue((void *)ip, new_code, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE, NULL); > > - else > > - text_poke_early((void *)ip, new_code, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE); > > + } else { > > + mutex_lock(&text_mutex); > > + text_poke((void *)ip, new_code, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE); > > + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); > > + } > > return 0; > > } > > And in the above case it's actively wrong for loosing the _queue() > thing. -- Sincerely yours, Mike. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel