public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 -next 2/2] RISC-V/perf: Use standard interface to get INTC domain
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 16:49:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230606-scribe-discuss-b884605cb870@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230605143512.707533-3-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1997 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 08:05:12PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Currently the PMU driver is using DT based lookup to
> find the INTC node for sscofpmf extension. This will not work
> for ACPI based systems causing the driver to fail to register
> the PMU overflow interrupt handler.
> 
> Hence, change the code to use the standard interface to find
> the INTC node which works irrespective of DT or ACPI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 17 ++---------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index 4f3ac296b3e2..0bc491252a44 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -739,7 +739,6 @@ static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	struct cpu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
> -	struct device_node *cpu, *child;
>  	struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
>  
>  	if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF)) {
> @@ -756,20 +755,8 @@ static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
>  	if (!riscv_pmu_use_irq)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> -	for_each_of_cpu_node(cpu) {
> -		child = of_get_compatible_child(cpu, "riscv,cpu-intc");
> -		if (!child) {
> -			pr_err("Failed to find INTC node\n");
> -			of_node_put(cpu);
> -			return -ENODEV;
> -		}
> -		domain = irq_find_host(child);
> -		of_node_put(child);
> -		if (domain) {
> -			of_node_put(cpu);
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(riscv_get_intc_hwnode(),
> +					  DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);

This riscv_get_intc_hwnode stuff is horrific, but that's besides the
point.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.

>  	if (!domain) {
>  		pr_err("Failed to find INTC IRQ root domain\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2023-06-06 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-05 14:35 [PATCH v1 -next 0/2] RISC-V ACPI: Assorted fixes Sunil V L
2023-06-05 14:35 ` [PATCH v1 -next 1/2] RISC-V: ACPI : Fix for usage of pointers in different address space Sunil V L
2023-06-06 15:35   ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-07  4:55     ` Sunil V L
2023-06-05 14:35 ` [PATCH v1 -next 2/2] RISC-V/perf: Use standard interface to get INTC domain Sunil V L
2023-06-06 15:49   ` Conor Dooley [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230606-scribe-discuss-b884605cb870@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox