From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>,
"A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] clk: fractional-divider: Improve approximation when zero based and export
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 12:29:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230617102919.27564-1-frank@oltmanns.dev> (raw)
The fractional divider approximation does not utilize the full available
range for clocks that are flagged CLK_FRAC_DIVIDER_ZERO_BASED. This
patchset aims to fix that.
It also adds test cases for the edge cases of fractional divider clocks
with and without the CLK_FRAC_DIVIDER_ZERO_BASED flag to highlight the
changes.
Finally, it also exports clk_fractional_divider_general_approximation so
that the test cases (but also other users like rockchip clk driver) can
be compiled as a module.
Unfortunately, I have no boards to test this patch. So all we have are
the unit tests. It seems the only user of this flag in mainline is
drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-7ulp.c, therefore I'm cc-ing
get_maintainers.pl --git-blame -f drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-7ulp.c
in the hopes of a wider audience.
Thank you for considering this contribution,
Frank
V3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230614185521.477924-1-frank@oltmanns.dev/
V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230613083626.227476-1-frank@oltmanns.dev/
V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230529133433.56215-1-frank@oltmanns.dev/
Changes in V4 (since V3):
- Export clk_fractional_divider_general_approximation so that users
(e.g., the testcases) can be compiled as modules.
- Change test cases so that they test
clk_fractional_divider_general_approximation again (like in V2)
instead of clk_fd_round_rate (like in V3), but keeping the structure
of V3 with separate file and individual test cases for each edge
case.
Changes in V3 (since V2):
- Completely reworked the test cases
- Moved tests to separate file as per Stephen's request
- Move each edge case into their individual test case as per
Stephen's request
- Test clk_fd_round_rate instead of
clk_fractional_divider_general_approximation as testing the latter
broke builds
Changes in V2 (since V1):
- Added test case as requested by Stephen Boyd
- Fixed commit message as the Cc: was missing a closing bracket, so that the
original mail unfortunately did not go out to A. s. Dong.
Frank Oltmanns (2):
clk: fractional-divider: Improve approximation when zero based and
export
clk: fractional-divider: tests: Add test suite for edge cases
drivers/clk/.kunitconfig | 1 +
drivers/clk/Kconfig | 7 +
drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c | 27 +++-
drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider_test.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider_test.c
--
2.41.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-17 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-17 10:29 Frank Oltmanns [this message]
2023-06-17 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] clk: fractional-divider: Improve approximation when zero based and export Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-17 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] clk: fractional-divider: tests: Add test suite for edge cases Frank Oltmanns
2023-06-17 11:54 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-17 12:15 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-17 13:32 ` Frank Oltmanns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230617102919.27564-1-frank@oltmanns.dev \
--to=frank@oltmanns.dev \
--cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).