From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF1ECEB64D8 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:51:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=hGn17mKQ0XDeldGKCiMcCr6zG+T2WQohQpBCQXE5/IA=; b=GQ+vTwIlpMI4ql ccGR32Y1NxaZwvMFgvNzGfPRh3Pqt1Gf/EkwUXWjlj6VKgBbJ6OHJBEXpX3INt5WjiIHrCe/qRSal 55YF9HSgjb4C7Wn0BDN+/b48gymZY6sjwBZ19lCKUU79S/ADvslQ5W/a9lOWWiRb4xUMf9JUuzDeH h11kagEzuYdVbxfWvsz/Ps/Zgy7xMK8gaff09RxV/Ni8BDRKs0FyfAuSkHgz2uYjY4E5csVhm+swQ FgA2ndYVIvKeqcSE8aPipa9IhF5UiC6RN2y9E8VbHDIhs+8cjdaXtFnOlHREuTXQ2ynjcomdw+6fh QjfrOTyFr2UTffmGuORA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qBchO-00BZrN-3C; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:51:14 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qBchL-00BZq7-2N; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:51:13 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E247612B3; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC9B6C433CA; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:51:04 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Kent Overstreet , Mike Rapoport , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , "David S. Miller" , Dinh Nguyen , Heiko Carstens , Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Luis Chamberlain , Mark Rutland , Michael Ellerman , Nadav Amit , "Naveen N. Rao" , Palmer Dabbelt , Puranjay Mohan , Rick Edgecombe , Russell King , Song Liu , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] mm/execmem: introduce execmem_data_alloc() Message-ID: <20230620105104.60cb64d8@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <87h6r4qo1d.ffs@tglx> References: <20230616085038.4121892-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20230616085038.4121892-7-rppt@kernel.org> <87jzw0qu3s.ffs@tglx> <20230618231431.4aj3k5ujye22sqai@moria.home.lan> <87h6r4qo1d.ffs@tglx> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230620_075111_816710_EBFB2AC4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.70 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 02:43:58 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Now you might argue that it _is_ a "hotpath" due to the BPF usage, but > then even more so as any intermediate wrapper which converts from one > data representation to another data representation is not going to > increase performance, right? Just as a side note. BPF can not attach its return calling code to functions that have more than 6 parameters (3 on 32 bit x86), because of the way BPF return path trampoline works. It is a requirement that all parameters live in registers, and none on the stack. -- Steve _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel