From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/13] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 10:18:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230702-49c5545eb1ae2d0cf11c7b95@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f44c3aa46971d524319c6340f9ce1b00c0182fd2.1688010022.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 09:42:58PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Only do the get/set tests on present and blessed registers
> since we don't know the capabilities of any new ones.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> index c61090806007..74fb6f6fdd09 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ extern int vcpu_configs_n;
> for_each_reg_filtered(i) \
> if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
>
> +#define for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) \
> + for ((i) = 0; (i) < blessed_n; ++(i)) \
> + if (find_reg(reg_list->reg, reg_list->n, blessed_reg[i]))
I just realized this is backwards. We need 'i' to index reg_list->reg in
the body of the loop. That means we need to write this as
#define for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) \
for_each_reg(i) \
if (find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
(Which, in hindsight, makes sense since we're replacing a for_each_reg()
loop.)
Thanks,
drew
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-01 13:42 [PATCH v5 00/13] RISCV: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Replace str_with_index with strdup_printf Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Drop SVE cap check in print_reg Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove print_reg's dependency on vcpu_config Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Rename vcpu_config and add to kvm_util.h Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Delete core_reg_fixup Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Split get-reg-list test code Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Finish generalizing get-reg-list Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Move reject_set check logic to a function Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 14:21 ` Andrew Jones
2023-07-01 14:35 ` Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Move finalize_vcpu back to run_test Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list Haibo Xu
2023-07-03 8:18 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2023-07-04 1:09 ` Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] KVM: selftests: Add skip_set facility to get_reg_list test Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 14:28 ` Andrew Jones
2023-07-01 14:35 ` Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:43 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] KVM: riscv: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API support Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 13:43 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add get-reg-list test Haibo Xu
2023-07-01 14:53 ` [PATCH v5 00/13] RISCV: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API Andrew Jones
2023-07-03 2:53 ` Haibo Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230702-49c5545eb1ae2d0cf11c7b95@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=haibo1.xu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=xiaobo55x@gmail.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox