From: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>,
Christophe Guibout <christophe.guibout@foss.st.com>,
Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com>,
<linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] rtc: stm32: fix issues of stm32_rtc_valid_alrm function
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 19:43:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230705174357.353616-7-valentin.caron@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230705174357.353616-1-valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
stm32_rtc_valid_alrm function has some issues :
- arithmetical operations are impossible on BCD values
- "cur_mon + 1" can overflow
- the use case with the next month, the same day/hour/minutes went wrong
To solve that, we prefer to use timestamp comparison.
e.g. : On 5 Dec. 2021, the alarm limit is 5 Jan. 2022 (+31 days)
On 31 Jan 2021, the alarm limit is 28 Feb. 2022 (+28 days)
Signed-off-by: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
index 17e549806784..836d39a124dd 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@
/* Max STM32 RTC register offset is 0x3FC */
#define UNDEF_REG 0xFFFF
+/* STM32 RTC driver time helpers */
+#define SEC_PER_DAY (24 * 60 * 60)
+
struct stm32_rtc;
struct stm32_rtc_registers {
@@ -427,40 +430,42 @@ static int stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
return 0;
}
-static int stm32_rtc_valid_alrm(struct stm32_rtc *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm)
+static int stm32_rtc_valid_alrm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
{
- const struct stm32_rtc_registers *regs = &rtc->data->regs;
- int cur_day, cur_mon, cur_year, cur_hour, cur_min, cur_sec;
- unsigned int tr = readl_relaxed(rtc->base + regs->tr);
- unsigned int dr = readl_relaxed(rtc->base + regs->dr);
-
- cur_day = (dr & STM32_RTC_DR_DATE) >> STM32_RTC_DR_DATE_SHIFT;
- cur_mon = (dr & STM32_RTC_DR_MONTH) >> STM32_RTC_DR_MONTH_SHIFT;
- cur_year = (dr & STM32_RTC_DR_YEAR) >> STM32_RTC_DR_YEAR_SHIFT;
- cur_sec = (tr & STM32_RTC_TR_SEC) >> STM32_RTC_TR_SEC_SHIFT;
- cur_min = (tr & STM32_RTC_TR_MIN) >> STM32_RTC_TR_MIN_SHIFT;
- cur_hour = (tr & STM32_RTC_TR_HOUR) >> STM32_RTC_TR_HOUR_SHIFT;
+ static struct rtc_time now;
+ time64_t max_alarm_time64;
+ int max_day_forward;
+ int next_month;
+ int next_year;
/*
* Assuming current date is M-D-Y H:M:S.
* RTC alarm can't be set on a specific month and year.
* So the valid alarm range is:
* M-D-Y H:M:S < alarm <= (M+1)-D-Y H:M:S
- * with a specific case for December...
*/
- if ((((tm->tm_year > cur_year) &&
- (tm->tm_mon == 0x1) && (cur_mon == 0x12)) ||
- ((tm->tm_year == cur_year) &&
- (tm->tm_mon <= cur_mon + 1))) &&
- ((tm->tm_mday > cur_day) ||
- ((tm->tm_mday == cur_day) &&
- ((tm->tm_hour > cur_hour) ||
- ((tm->tm_hour == cur_hour) && (tm->tm_min > cur_min)) ||
- ((tm->tm_hour == cur_hour) && (tm->tm_min == cur_min) &&
- (tm->tm_sec >= cur_sec))))))
- return 0;
+ stm32_rtc_read_time(dev, &now);
+
+ /*
+ * Find the next month and the year of the next month.
+ * Note: tm_mon and next_month are from 0 to 11
+ */
+ next_month = now.tm_mon + 1;
+ if (next_month == 12) {
+ next_month = 0;
+ next_year = now.tm_year + 1;
+ } else {
+ next_year = now.tm_year;
+ }
- return -EINVAL;
+ /* Find the maximum limit of alarm in days. */
+ max_day_forward = rtc_month_days(now.tm_mon, now.tm_year)
+ - now.tm_mday
+ + min(rtc_month_days(next_month, next_year), now.tm_mday);
+
+ /* Convert to timestamp and compare the alarm time and its upper limit */
+ max_alarm_time64 = rtc_tm_to_time64(&now) + max_day_forward * SEC_PER_DAY;
+ return rtc_tm_to_time64(tm) <= max_alarm_time64 ? 0 : -EINVAL;
}
static int stm32_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
@@ -471,17 +476,17 @@ static int stm32_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
unsigned int cr, isr, alrmar;
int ret = 0;
- tm2bcd(tm);
-
/*
* RTC alarm can't be set on a specific date, unless this date is
* up to the same day of month next month.
*/
- if (stm32_rtc_valid_alrm(rtc, tm) < 0) {
+ if (stm32_rtc_valid_alrm(dev, tm) < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "Alarm can be set only on upcoming month.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
+ tm2bcd(tm);
+
alrmar = 0;
/* tm_year and tm_mon are not used because not supported by RTC */
alrmar |= (tm->tm_mday << STM32_RTC_ALRMXR_DATE_SHIFT) &
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-05 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 17:43 [PATCH v2 0/7] rtc: stm32: multiple bug fixes and improvements Valentin Caron
2023-07-05 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] rtc: stm32: use the proper register sequence to read date/time Valentin Caron
2023-07-05 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] rtc: stm32: don't stop time counter if not needed Valentin Caron
2023-07-05 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] rtc: stm32: improve rtc precision Valentin Caron
2023-07-05 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] rtc: stm32: don't print an error on probe deferral Valentin Caron
2023-07-05 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] rtc: stm32: change PM callbacks to "_noirq()" Valentin Caron
2023-07-05 17:43 ` Valentin Caron [this message]
2023-07-05 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] rtc: stm32: fix unnecessary parentheses Valentin Caron
2023-07-27 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] rtc: stm32: multiple bug fixes and improvements Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230705174357.353616-7-valentin.caron@foss.st.com \
--to=valentin.caron@foss.st.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=antonio.borneo@foss.st.com \
--cc=christophe.guibout@foss.st.com \
--cc=gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).