From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50739EB64DC for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:20:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=fUvGB9+T8wxk6b4dsLIYsXA1nJBSTMyQxbzPaI62GTg=; b=NYoOviRpnF2jmq OPilgjwygfS0Vt/S/uXTT60QC+8zmYSSXuNJrjJ8/DuyzkoUFkNSJq/hFPwNQNKTjxafTX+ygCgyF 8WvND6uULysndm+aGe2oqL+tXmAN2NIQWXWOTPN6qdrwFVC5a153arl1JQqfzCvUAlkX6mDIKyOUc 3CaK6B9z+9hL4dIuFCwM79SITx4CcdlAYAplY7+5/2b48PVTU+957IwiUFJfiJiV3QPWJyjquWcRN H5Jc+Z+U0ctBWeAbIhyT/W3qWm+gMf45d9UVmWLxIK5QhQ2F4vNJjiiSdqcPMQchtRj01oG/4b1i2 wXSEfNIGN3FZWqcFvJWw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qJLhr-00Fyxp-0d; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:19:39 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qJLho-00Fyx6-0c for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:19:37 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11AB615F4; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F58CC433C8; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:19:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689113974; bh=QiGw3IUmr9u/cOXBUpvP1n/R7zjakhkvbq/PAFBNEp4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oYg6NhE+Pz+v/gyFwkwdF7lFqFLPjS89DaJiIiBqzRWgCfhVDHoZjEizizD0k4UdB HhJFpGwqU+s+XT7MhXwa55AgsPKIn29094qxuq6CdqWazdCB1Fl8SwoiMWrsaHxHf2 vPad4VT+/T/2VyQf8+D6fzv0L3GuvSGpk3hgmlA5xV+e2+43vYxOMlWlnZGDQDmtXX EUne5GcZLKV8LLGIXL1G3ZckKNRNw/ei3pYfxNWgmHul6Ky5oepE+c1n6oH5atXZXf PNjkGrY0UHR8P765AlVP24pS91y8Ik32a2b4y3zmchLKxyoi15fmiTNy2+e8L1Pj1u a8Pdeyrx2eOHA== Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:19:30 +0200 From: Andi Shyti To: Jaewon Kim Cc: Mark Brown , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alim Akhtar , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chanho Park Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: s3c64xx: clear loopback bit after loopback test Message-ID: <20230711221930.2qinef626kxtthsv@intel.intel> References: <20230711082020.138165-1-jaewon02.kim@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230711082020.138165-1-jaewon02.kim@samsung.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230711_151936_288633_8277A36E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.55 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Jaewon, On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:20:20PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote: > When SPI loopback transfer is performed, S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_SELF_LOOPBACK > bit still remained. It works as loopback even if the next transfer is > not spi loopback mode. > If not SPI_LOOP, needs to clear S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_SELF_LOOPBACK bit. > > Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim with the change suggested by Chanho: Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti Mark, can you add the Fixes: ffb7bcd3b27e ("spi: s3c64xx: support loopback mode") tag or should Jaewon resend? Thanks, Andi > --- > drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c > index fd55697144cc..b6c2659a66ca 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c > @@ -684,6 +684,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_config(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd) > > if ((sdd->cur_mode & SPI_LOOP) && sdd->port_conf->has_loopback) > val |= S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_SELF_LOOPBACK; > + else > + val &= ~S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_SELF_LOOPBACK; > > writel(val, regs + S3C64XX_SPI_MODE_CFG); > > -- > 2.17.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel