From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2708CEB64DC for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:27:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=K5KQVEX/2HKaDuOx2U+w80t6DHnLliMC7BnFD/yiQTQ=; b=cnficnyNjS5+vg X6nu4W11tOYrZnWP62QDZXG7VwH74p0tox59yE5aP/BGwu0f26ThX9ng0pI3Iy/SCEHjWMA7l81/g 7Pd75qcnskQwZrM15tht1CCwBGaVf4TUBnhF4nAZM4K+EUUx9hnvPCm9Bn7mqtEwPQmO+0El5WKhK UUO0xnD8eZlRzb2voOSWzRmuwEANTzLXWzvMwJX4f3XoSDsrvELUmt+vSN2Xi/9UtPNlWSPOffxLo +lcZBsFELlUSXvxshu/umzM+QCbLto1ITt2TNYU7PMD5iUI5JIeqOaq7KxQ5KGjZjef4FGYuw4wyc pTIpovo1Vd8hxdd9JloA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qKNVL-006xcX-39; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:26:59 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qKNVI-006xbQ-2a for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:26:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6908E61C04; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EC83C433C7; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:26:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1689359214; bh=Uqw01r9Q4nZaSGzSWhg/cFs1K2/ha6NQPIvt32ce+Kk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MX55XQyE/P6pepwgUDQ/NMw+IrIagoENtcz2vTHQOrFVh7sSbxbT6IOUrcvo+3/LV CuR9sSTdByUL1ulAhAXa/UiU5xuy8+29hj0rhSutkYXDUzK6Yz+btcLVjxG8iHmoh4 61RSmgVQw6cYBpXu2Rb64eTbz6FC98nJTgvM2iOo= Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:26:53 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: John Hubbard Cc: Mark Brown , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , Anders Roxell , Muhammad Usama Anjum , Ryan Roberts , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alexandre Ghiti Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Fix arm64 test installation Message-Id: <20230714112653.0b42d3c9818b038d219b5e41@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230710-kselftest-fix-arm64-v1-1-48e872844f25@kernel.org> <8d944238-1a9a-e93e-fdab-54e74fa12e11@linuxfoundation.org> <785e1c1c-84d8-e87d-f22f-9a53d27f30f6@nvidia.com> <620a5b91-9715-ee28-423c-851506b10832@linuxfoundation.org> <421bebb3-19e9-47a7-8b2b-f69f125df22f@sirena.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230714_112656_885344_C622996D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.79 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:19:11 -0700 John Hubbard wrote: > On 7/14/23 11:09, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:48:51AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > >> On 7/13/23 14:16, John Hubbard wrote: > > > >>> Actually, I was hoping that my two fixes [1], [2] could be used, instead > >>> of reverting the feature. > > > >> Mark! Are you good with taking these two - do these fix the > >> problems you are seeing? > > > > I reviewed the one that's relevant to me already, the arm64 one, I'd not > > seen or tested the RISC-V one but that looks fine too. I'm pretty sure > > That riscv patch already has a Tested-by from Alexandre Ghiti: > > https://lore.kernel.org/f903634d-851f-af64-8d9a-6b13d813587c@ghiti.fr > > > > Andrew queued it already though ICBW. Either way it'd be good to get > > this into -rc2, this is seriously disrupting arm64 CI and I'm guessing > > the RISC-V CI too. > I just dropped selftests-arm64-fix-build-failure-during-the-emit_tests-step.patch and selftests-fix-arm64-test-installation.patch, as Shuah is merging them. This is all rather confusing. Perhaps a full resend of everything will help. I'll assume that Shuah will be handling them. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel