[PATCH 0/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Misc fixes

[PATCH 0/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Misc fixes

[Miquel Raynal]

Hello,

A recent kernel test robot report made me look at a specific area of
this driver after it has been deeply reworked to implement
exec_op(). While at it, I progressively fixed other things which stoud
out to me, and finished by addressing additional checkpatch.pl --strict
warnings.

This is untested, especially the last patch which needs validation from
the maintainers of the driver.

Thanks,
Miquèl

Miquel Raynal (8):
  mtd: rawnand: qcom: Use the BIT() macro
  mtd: rawnand: qcom: Use u8 instead of uint8_t
  mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix alignment with open parenthesis
  mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix the spacing
  mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix wrong indentation
  mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix a typo
  mtd: rawnand: qcom: Early structure initialization
  mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 69 +++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Use the BIT() macro

[Miquel Raynal]

Fix the following checkpatch warning:
    "CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro"

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index b1e69d634d4a..023c8b36426b 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@
 /* NAND_ERASED_CW_DETECT_CFG bits */
 #define	ERASED_CW_ECC_MASK		1
 #define	AUTO_DETECT_RES			0
-#define	MASK_ECC			(1 << ERASED_CW_ECC_MASK)
-#define	RESET_ERASED_DET		(1 << AUTO_DETECT_RES)
+#define	MASK_ECC			BIT(ERASED_CW_ECC_MASK)
+#define	RESET_ERASED_DET		BIT(AUTO_DETECT_RES)
 #define	ACTIVE_ERASED_DET		(0 << AUTO_DETECT_RES)
 #define	CLR_ERASED_PAGE_DET		(RESET_ERASED_DET | MASK_ECC)
 #define	SET_ERASED_PAGE_DET		(ACTIVE_ERASED_DET | MASK_ECC)
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Use u8 instead of uint8_t

[Miquel Raynal]

Fix the following checkpatch warning:
    "CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u8' over 'uint8_t'"

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index 023c8b36426b..0136df01738e 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ nandc_set_reg(chip, reg,			\
 /* Returns the dma address for reg read buffer */
 #define reg_buf_dma_addr(chip, vaddr) \
 	((chip)->reg_read_dma + \
-	((uint8_t *)(vaddr) - (uint8_t *)(chip)->reg_read_buf))
+	((u8 *)(vaddr) - (u8 *)(chip)->reg_read_buf))
 
 #define QPIC_PER_CW_CMD_ELEMENTS	32
 #define QPIC_PER_CW_CMD_SGL		32
@@ -1884,7 +1884,7 @@ static void qcom_nandc_codeword_fixup(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int page)
 }
 
 /* implements ecc->read_page() */
-static int qcom_nandc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
+static int qcom_nandc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf,
 				int oob_required, int page)
 {
 	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
@@ -1912,7 +1912,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
 }
 
 /* implements ecc->read_page_raw() */
-static int qcom_nandc_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
+static int qcom_nandc_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf,
 				    int oob_required, int page)
 {
 	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
@@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_read_oob(struct nand_chip *chip, int page)
 }
 
 /* implements ecc->write_page() */
-static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
+static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *buf,
 				 int oob_required, int page)
 {
 	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
@@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
 
 /* implements ecc->write_page_raw() */
 static int qcom_nandc_write_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip,
-				     const uint8_t *buf, int oob_required,
+				     const u8 *buf, int oob_required,
 				     int page)
 {
 	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix alignment with open parenthesis

[Miquel Raynal]

Fix the following checkpatch warning:
    	"CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis"

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 16 +++++++---------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index 0136df01738e..54a7b49bda87 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -2348,7 +2348,7 @@ static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 }
 
 static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
-				     struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
+				    struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
 {
 	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
 	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
@@ -2593,7 +2593,7 @@ static int qcom_op_cmd_mapping(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, u8 cmd,
 /* NAND framework ->exec_op() hooks and related helpers */
 static void qcom_parse_instructions(struct nand_chip *chip,
 				    const struct nand_subop *subop,
-					struct qcom_op *q_op)
+				    struct qcom_op *q_op)
 {
 	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
 	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
@@ -3089,19 +3089,17 @@ static int qcom_nandc_alloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
 	 */
 	nandc->buf_size = 532;
 
-	nandc->data_buffer = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, nandc->buf_size,
-					GFP_KERNEL);
+	nandc->data_buffer = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, nandc->buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!nandc->data_buffer)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	nandc->regs = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*nandc->regs),
-					GFP_KERNEL);
+	nandc->regs = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*nandc->regs), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!nandc->regs)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	nandc->reg_read_buf = devm_kcalloc(nandc->dev,
-				MAX_REG_RD, sizeof(*nandc->reg_read_buf),
-				GFP_KERNEL);
+	nandc->reg_read_buf = devm_kcalloc(nandc->dev, MAX_REG_RD,
+					   sizeof(*nandc->reg_read_buf),
+					   GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!nandc->reg_read_buf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 4/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix the spacing

[Miquel Raynal]

Fix following checkpatch warning:
	"CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines"
	"CHECK: Please use a blank line after
		function/struct/union/enum declarations"

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index 54a7b49bda87..554cca3801da 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -1997,7 +1997,6 @@ static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *buf,
 			oob_size = ecc->bytes;
 		}
 
-
 		write_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, data_buf, data_size,
 			       i == (ecc->steps - 1) ? NAND_BAM_NO_EOT : 0);
 
@@ -2373,6 +2372,7 @@ qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength)
 {
 	return strength == 4 ? 12 : 16;
 }
+
 NAND_ECC_CAPS_SINGLE(qcom_nandc_ecc_caps, qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes,
 		     NANDC_STEP_SIZE, 4, 8);
 
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 5/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix wrong indentation

[Miquel Raynal]

The main "for" loop in qcom_read_status_exec() does guard the following
to if's which are badly indented. Fix the indentation.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index 554cca3801da..3adc40ef5cf6 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -2722,12 +2722,12 @@ static int qcom_read_status_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,
 	for (i = 0; i < num_cw; i++) {
 		flash_status = le32_to_cpu(nandc->reg_read_buf[i]);
 
-	if (flash_status & FS_MPU_ERR)
-		host->status &= ~NAND_STATUS_WP;
+		if (flash_status & FS_MPU_ERR)
+			host->status &= ~NAND_STATUS_WP;
 
-	if (flash_status & FS_OP_ERR ||
-	 (i == (num_cw - 1) && (flash_status & FS_DEVICE_STS_ERR)))
-		host->status |= NAND_STATUS_FAIL;
+		if (flash_status & FS_OP_ERR ||
+		    (i == (num_cw - 1) && (flash_status & FS_DEVICE_STS_ERR)))
+			host->status |= NAND_STATUS_FAIL;
 	}
 
 	flash_status = host->status;
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 6/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix a typo

[Miquel Raynal]

Fix the following checkpatch warning:
	CHECK: 'tranasction' may be misspelled - perhaps 'transaction'?

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index 3adc40ef5cf6..cb6ccaa19224 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -3144,7 +3144,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_alloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
 		/*
 		 * Initially allocate BAM transaction to read ONFI param page.
 		 * After detecting all the devices, this BAM transaction will
-		 * be freed and the next BAM tranasction will be allocated with
+		 * be freed and the next BAM transaction will be allocated with
 		 * maximum codeword size
 		 */
 		nandc->max_cwperpage = 1;
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 7/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Early structure initialization

[Miquel Raynal]

Instead of allocating a structure on the stack with random data and then
expect the callee to perform the initialization (which is, in general,
error prone), prefer zeroing the structure explicitly at allocation and
provide the already zeroed area, so no explicit memset operation is
needed. It is probably safer to do so, so we limit the timeframe when
dirty data could actually be accessed by mistake.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index cb6ccaa19224..4fc8dafa8f03 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -2600,8 +2600,6 @@ static void qcom_parse_instructions(struct nand_chip *chip,
 	unsigned int op_id;
 	int i;
 
-	memset(q_op, 0, sizeof(*q_op));
-
 	for (op_id = 0; op_id < subop->ninstrs; op_id++) {
 		unsigned int offset, naddrs;
 		const u8 *addrs;
@@ -2681,7 +2679,7 @@ static int qcom_read_status_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,
 	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
 	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
 	struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
-	struct qcom_op q_op;
+	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
 	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
 	unsigned int op_id = 0;
 	unsigned int len = 0;
@@ -2744,7 +2742,7 @@ static int qcom_read_id_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_subo
 {
 	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
 	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
-	struct qcom_op q_op;
+	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
 	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
 	unsigned int op_id = 0;
 	unsigned int len = 0;
@@ -2795,7 +2793,7 @@ static int qcom_misc_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_sub
 {
 	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
 	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
-	struct qcom_op q_op;
+	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op);
@@ -2838,7 +2836,7 @@ static int qcom_param_page_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,  const struct nand_
 {
 	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
 	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
-	struct qcom_op q_op;
+	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
 	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
 	unsigned int op_id = 0;
 	unsigned int len = 0;
@@ -2935,7 +2933,7 @@ static int qcom_erase_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_su
 {
 	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
 	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
-	struct qcom_op q_op;
+	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op);
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

[Miquel Raynal]

The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it looks
a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op structure by
using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs with
the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.

Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index 4fc8dafa8f03..dc8ca60fc2e2 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -2616,12 +2616,13 @@ static void qcom_parse_instructions(struct nand_chip *chip,
 			offset = nand_subop_get_addr_start_off(subop, op_id);
 			naddrs = nand_subop_get_num_addr_cyc(subop, op_id);
 			addrs = &instr->ctx.addr.addrs[offset];
-			for (i = 0; i < MAX_ADDRESS_CYCLE; i++) {
-				if (i < 4)
-					q_op->addr1_reg |= (u32)addrs[i] << i * 8;
-				else
-					q_op->addr2_reg |= addrs[i];
-			}
+
+			for (i = 0; i < min_t(unsigned int, 4, naddrs); i++)
+				q_op->addr1_reg |= addrs[i] << (i * 8);
+
+			if (naddrs > 4)
+				q_op->addr2_reg |= addrs[4];
+
 			q_op->rdy_delay_ns = instr->delay_ns;
 			break;
 
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Use the BIT() macro

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:05PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
>     "CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>

- Mani

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index b1e69d634d4a..023c8b36426b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@
>  /* NAND_ERASED_CW_DETECT_CFG bits */
>  #define	ERASED_CW_ECC_MASK		1
>  #define	AUTO_DETECT_RES			0
> -#define	MASK_ECC			(1 << ERASED_CW_ECC_MASK)
> -#define	RESET_ERASED_DET		(1 << AUTO_DETECT_RES)
> +#define	MASK_ECC			BIT(ERASED_CW_ECC_MASK)
> +#define	RESET_ERASED_DET		BIT(AUTO_DETECT_RES)
>  #define	ACTIVE_ERASED_DET		(0 << AUTO_DETECT_RES)
>  #define	CLR_ERASED_PAGE_DET		(RESET_ERASED_DET | MASK_ECC)
>  #define	SET_ERASED_PAGE_DET		(ACTIVE_ERASED_DET | MASK_ECC)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Use u8 instead of uint8_t

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:06PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
>     "CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u8' over 'uint8_t'"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>

- Mani

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 023c8b36426b..0136df01738e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ nandc_set_reg(chip, reg,			\
>  /* Returns the dma address for reg read buffer */
>  #define reg_buf_dma_addr(chip, vaddr) \
>  	((chip)->reg_read_dma + \
> -	((uint8_t *)(vaddr) - (uint8_t *)(chip)->reg_read_buf))
> +	((u8 *)(vaddr) - (u8 *)(chip)->reg_read_buf))
>  
>  #define QPIC_PER_CW_CMD_ELEMENTS	32
>  #define QPIC_PER_CW_CMD_SGL		32
> @@ -1884,7 +1884,7 @@ static void qcom_nandc_codeword_fixup(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int page)
>  }
>  
>  /* implements ecc->read_page() */
> -static int qcom_nandc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> +static int qcom_nandc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf,
>  				int oob_required, int page)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> @@ -1912,7 +1912,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
>  }
>  
>  /* implements ecc->read_page_raw() */
> -static int qcom_nandc_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> +static int qcom_nandc_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf,
>  				    int oob_required, int page)
>  {
>  	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> @@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_read_oob(struct nand_chip *chip, int page)
>  }
>  
>  /* implements ecc->write_page() */
> -static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
> +static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *buf,
>  				 int oob_required, int page)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> @@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
>  
>  /* implements ecc->write_page_raw() */
>  static int qcom_nandc_write_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip,
> -				     const uint8_t *buf, int oob_required,
> +				     const u8 *buf, int oob_required,
>  				     int page)
>  {
>  	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix alignment with open parenthesis

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:07PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
>     	"CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>

- Mani

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 0136df01738e..54a7b49bda87 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2348,7 +2348,7 @@ static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
>  }
>  
>  static int qcom_nand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> -				     struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
> +				    struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
>  {
>  	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> @@ -2593,7 +2593,7 @@ static int qcom_op_cmd_mapping(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, u8 cmd,
>  /* NAND framework ->exec_op() hooks and related helpers */
>  static void qcom_parse_instructions(struct nand_chip *chip,
>  				    const struct nand_subop *subop,
> -					struct qcom_op *q_op)
> +				    struct qcom_op *q_op)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>  	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
> @@ -3089,19 +3089,17 @@ static int qcom_nandc_alloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>  	 */
>  	nandc->buf_size = 532;
>  
> -	nandc->data_buffer = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, nandc->buf_size,
> -					GFP_KERNEL);
> +	nandc->data_buffer = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, nandc->buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!nandc->data_buffer)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	nandc->regs = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*nandc->regs),
> -					GFP_KERNEL);
> +	nandc->regs = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*nandc->regs), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!nandc->regs)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	nandc->reg_read_buf = devm_kcalloc(nandc->dev,
> -				MAX_REG_RD, sizeof(*nandc->reg_read_buf),
> -				GFP_KERNEL);
> +	nandc->reg_read_buf = devm_kcalloc(nandc->dev, MAX_REG_RD,
> +					   sizeof(*nandc->reg_read_buf),
> +					   GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!nandc->reg_read_buf)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 4/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix the spacing

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:08PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix following checkpatch warning:
> 	"CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines"
> 	"CHECK: Please use a blank line after
> 		function/struct/union/enum declarations"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>

- Mani

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 54a7b49bda87..554cca3801da 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -1997,7 +1997,6 @@ static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *buf,
>  			oob_size = ecc->bytes;
>  		}
>  
> -
>  		write_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, data_buf, data_size,
>  			       i == (ecc->steps - 1) ? NAND_BAM_NO_EOT : 0);
>  
> @@ -2373,6 +2372,7 @@ qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength)
>  {
>  	return strength == 4 ? 12 : 16;
>  }
> +
>  NAND_ECC_CAPS_SINGLE(qcom_nandc_ecc_caps, qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes,
>  		     NANDC_STEP_SIZE, 4, 8);
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 5/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix wrong indentation

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:09PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The main "for" loop in qcom_read_status_exec() does guard the following
> to if's which are badly indented. Fix the indentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>

- Mani

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 554cca3801da..3adc40ef5cf6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2722,12 +2722,12 @@ static int qcom_read_status_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_cw; i++) {
>  		flash_status = le32_to_cpu(nandc->reg_read_buf[i]);
>  
> -	if (flash_status & FS_MPU_ERR)
> -		host->status &= ~NAND_STATUS_WP;
> +		if (flash_status & FS_MPU_ERR)
> +			host->status &= ~NAND_STATUS_WP;
>  
> -	if (flash_status & FS_OP_ERR ||
> -	 (i == (num_cw - 1) && (flash_status & FS_DEVICE_STS_ERR)))
> -		host->status |= NAND_STATUS_FAIL;
> +		if (flash_status & FS_OP_ERR ||
> +		    (i == (num_cw - 1) && (flash_status & FS_DEVICE_STS_ERR)))
> +			host->status |= NAND_STATUS_FAIL;
>  	}
>  
>  	flash_status = host->status;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 6/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix a typo

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:10PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
> 	CHECK: 'tranasction' may be misspelled - perhaps 'transaction'?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>

- Mani

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 3adc40ef5cf6..cb6ccaa19224 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -3144,7 +3144,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_alloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>  		/*
>  		 * Initially allocate BAM transaction to read ONFI param page.
>  		 * After detecting all the devices, this BAM transaction will
> -		 * be freed and the next BAM tranasction will be allocated with
> +		 * be freed and the next BAM transaction will be allocated with
>  		 * maximum codeword size
>  		 */
>  		nandc->max_cwperpage = 1;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Early structure initialization

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:11PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Instead of allocating a structure on the stack with random data and then
> expect the callee to perform the initialization (which is, in general,
> error prone), prefer zeroing the structure explicitly at allocation and
> provide the already zeroed area, so no explicit memset operation is
> needed. It is probably safer to do so, so we limit the timeframe when
> dirty data could actually be accessed by mistake.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>

- Mani

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 12 +++++-------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index cb6ccaa19224..4fc8dafa8f03 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2600,8 +2600,6 @@ static void qcom_parse_instructions(struct nand_chip *chip,
>  	unsigned int op_id;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	memset(q_op, 0, sizeof(*q_op));
> -
>  	for (op_id = 0; op_id < subop->ninstrs; op_id++) {
>  		unsigned int offset, naddrs;
>  		const u8 *addrs;
> @@ -2681,7 +2679,7 @@ static int qcom_read_status_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>  	struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
> -	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
>  	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
>  	unsigned int op_id = 0;
>  	unsigned int len = 0;
> @@ -2744,7 +2742,7 @@ static int qcom_read_id_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_subo
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> -	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
>  	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
>  	unsigned int op_id = 0;
>  	unsigned int len = 0;
> @@ -2795,7 +2793,7 @@ static int qcom_misc_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_sub
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> -	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op);
> @@ -2838,7 +2836,7 @@ static int qcom_param_page_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,  const struct nand_
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> -	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
>  	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
>  	unsigned int op_id = 0;
>  	unsigned int len = 0;
> @@ -2935,7 +2933,7 @@ static int qcom_erase_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_su
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> -	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:12PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
> been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it looks
> a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op structure by
> using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs with
> the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
> right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.
> 
> Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

LGTM! But I'm relying on Sadre to test it.

Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>

- Mani

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 4fc8dafa8f03..dc8ca60fc2e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2616,12 +2616,13 @@ static void qcom_parse_instructions(struct nand_chip *chip,
>  			offset = nand_subop_get_addr_start_off(subop, op_id);
>  			naddrs = nand_subop_get_num_addr_cyc(subop, op_id);
>  			addrs = &instr->ctx.addr.addrs[offset];
> -			for (i = 0; i < MAX_ADDRESS_CYCLE; i++) {
> -				if (i < 4)
> -					q_op->addr1_reg |= (u32)addrs[i] << i * 8;
> -				else
> -					q_op->addr2_reg |= addrs[i];
> -			}
> +
> +			for (i = 0; i < min_t(unsigned int, 4, naddrs); i++)
> +				q_op->addr1_reg |= addrs[i] << (i * 8);
> +
> +			if (naddrs > 4)
> +				q_op->addr2_reg |= addrs[4];
> +
>  			q_op->rdy_delay_ns = instr->delay_ns;
>  			break;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Sadre,

mani@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:08:43 +0530:

> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:12PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
> > been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it looks
> > a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op structure by
> > using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs with
> > the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
> > right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.
> > 
> > Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>  
> 
> LGTM! But I'm relying on Sadre to test it.
> 
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>

I don't think I've received feedback from Sadre, I would like to close
these issues, can you please test and give us feedback?

Thanks a lot,
Miquèl

> 
> - Mani
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 13 +++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> > index 4fc8dafa8f03..dc8ca60fc2e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> > @@ -2616,12 +2616,13 @@ static void qcom_parse_instructions(struct nand_chip *chip,
> >  			offset = nand_subop_get_addr_start_off(subop, op_id);
> >  			naddrs = nand_subop_get_num_addr_cyc(subop, op_id);
> >  			addrs = &instr->ctx.addr.addrs[offset];
> > -			for (i = 0; i < MAX_ADDRESS_CYCLE; i++) {
> > -				if (i < 4)
> > -					q_op->addr1_reg |= (u32)addrs[i] << i * 8;
> > -				else
> > -					q_op->addr2_reg |= addrs[i];
> > -			}
> > +
> > +			for (i = 0; i < min_t(unsigned int, 4, naddrs); i++)
> > +				q_op->addr1_reg |= addrs[i] << (i * 8);
> > +
> > +			if (naddrs > 4)
> > +				q_op->addr2_reg |= addrs[4];
> > +
> >  			q_op->rdy_delay_ns = instr->delay_ns;
> >  			break;
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> >   
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Early structure initialization

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 7/16/23 15:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Instead of allocating a structure on the stack with random data and then
> expect the callee to perform the initialization (which is, in general,
> error prone), prefer zeroing the structure explicitly at allocation and
> provide the already zeroed area, so no explicit memset operation is
> needed. It is probably safer to do so, so we limit the timeframe when
> dirty data could actually be accessed by mistake.

Why is zeroed data considered safe or sane?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Early structure initialization

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Tudor,

tudor.ambarus@linaro.org wrote on Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:03:40 +0100:

> On 7/16/23 15:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Instead of allocating a structure on the stack with random data and then
> > expect the callee to perform the initialization (which is, in general,
> > error prone), prefer zeroing the structure explicitly at allocation and
> > provide the already zeroed area, so no explicit memset operation is
> > needed. It is probably safer to do so, so we limit the timeframe when
> > dirty data could actually be accessed by mistake.  
> 
> Why is zeroed data considered safe or sane?

I believe allocating structures like that on the stack will make their
content inherit from previous values used there, which is generally a
bad idea if we expect the structure to be zeroed, which is the case
here.

This structure is meant to be zeroed before being used, so instead of
carrying stale data that will be wiped off later, I prefer to have it
zeroed earlier. Reducing the time when one could access stale data or
write something that will be reset does not sound totally useless to
me, in particular given the number of changes this driver has been
subject to recently.

Thanks,
Miquèl

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Use the BIT() macro

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 7/16/23 15:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
>     "CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index b1e69d634d4a..023c8b36426b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@
>  /* NAND_ERASED_CW_DETECT_CFG bits */
>  #define	ERASED_CW_ECC_MASK		1
>  #define	AUTO_DETECT_RES			0
> -#define	MASK_ECC			(1 << ERASED_CW_ECC_MASK)
> -#define	RESET_ERASED_DET		(1 << AUTO_DETECT_RES)
> +#define	MASK_ECC			BIT(ERASED_CW_ECC_MASK)
> +#define	RESET_ERASED_DET		BIT(AUTO_DETECT_RES)
>  #define	ACTIVE_ERASED_DET		(0 << AUTO_DETECT_RES)
>  #define	CLR_ERASED_PAGE_DET		(RESET_ERASED_DET | MASK_ECC)
>  #define	SET_ERASED_PAGE_DET		(ACTIVE_ERASED_DET | MASK_ECC)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Use u8 instead of uint8_t

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 7/16/23 15:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
>     "CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u8' over 'uint8_t'"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 023c8b36426b..0136df01738e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ nandc_set_reg(chip, reg,			\
>  /* Returns the dma address for reg read buffer */
>  #define reg_buf_dma_addr(chip, vaddr) \
>  	((chip)->reg_read_dma + \
> -	((uint8_t *)(vaddr) - (uint8_t *)(chip)->reg_read_buf))
> +	((u8 *)(vaddr) - (u8 *)(chip)->reg_read_buf))
>  
>  #define QPIC_PER_CW_CMD_ELEMENTS	32
>  #define QPIC_PER_CW_CMD_SGL		32
> @@ -1884,7 +1884,7 @@ static void qcom_nandc_codeword_fixup(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int page)
>  }
>  
>  /* implements ecc->read_page() */
> -static int qcom_nandc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> +static int qcom_nandc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf,
>  				int oob_required, int page)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> @@ -1912,7 +1912,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
>  }
>  
>  /* implements ecc->read_page_raw() */
> -static int qcom_nandc_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> +static int qcom_nandc_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf,
>  				    int oob_required, int page)
>  {
>  	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> @@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_read_oob(struct nand_chip *chip, int page)
>  }
>  
>  /* implements ecc->write_page() */
> -static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
> +static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *buf,
>  				 int oob_required, int page)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> @@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
>  
>  /* implements ecc->write_page_raw() */
>  static int qcom_nandc_write_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip,
> -				     const uint8_t *buf, int oob_required,
> +				     const u8 *buf, int oob_required,
>  				     int page)
>  {
>  	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix alignment with open parenthesis

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 7/16/23 15:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
>     	"CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 4/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix the spacing

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 7/16/23 15:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix following checkpatch warning:
> 	"CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines"
> 	"CHECK: Please use a blank line after
> 		function/struct/union/enum declarations"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 54a7b49bda87..554cca3801da 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -1997,7 +1997,6 @@ static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *buf,
>  			oob_size = ecc->bytes;
>  		}
>  
> -
>  		write_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, data_buf, data_size,
>  			       i == (ecc->steps - 1) ? NAND_BAM_NO_EOT : 0);
>  
> @@ -2373,6 +2372,7 @@ qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength)
>  {
>  	return strength == 4 ? 12 : 16;
>  }
> +
>  NAND_ECC_CAPS_SINGLE(qcom_nandc_ecc_caps, qcom_nandc_calc_ecc_bytes,
>  		     NANDC_STEP_SIZE, 4, 8);
>  

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 5/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix wrong indentation

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 7/16/23 15:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The main "for" loop in qcom_read_status_exec() does guard the following
> to if's which are badly indented. Fix the indentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 554cca3801da..3adc40ef5cf6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2722,12 +2722,12 @@ static int qcom_read_status_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_cw; i++) {
>  		flash_status = le32_to_cpu(nandc->reg_read_buf[i]);
>  
> -	if (flash_status & FS_MPU_ERR)
> -		host->status &= ~NAND_STATUS_WP;
> +		if (flash_status & FS_MPU_ERR)
> +			host->status &= ~NAND_STATUS_WP;
>  
> -	if (flash_status & FS_OP_ERR ||
> -	 (i == (num_cw - 1) && (flash_status & FS_DEVICE_STS_ERR)))
> -		host->status |= NAND_STATUS_FAIL;
> +		if (flash_status & FS_OP_ERR ||
> +		    (i == (num_cw - 1) && (flash_status & FS_DEVICE_STS_ERR)))
> +			host->status |= NAND_STATUS_FAIL;
>  	}
>  
>  	flash_status = host->status;

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 6/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix a typo

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 7/16/23 15:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
> 	CHECK: 'tranasction' may be misspelled - perhaps 'transaction'?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 3adc40ef5cf6..cb6ccaa19224 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -3144,7 +3144,7 @@ static int qcom_nandc_alloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>  		/*
>  		 * Initially allocate BAM transaction to read ONFI param page.
>  		 * After detecting all the devices, this BAM transaction will
> -		 * be freed and the next BAM tranasction will be allocated with
> +		 * be freed and the next BAM transaction will be allocated with
>  		 * maximum codeword size
>  		 */
>  		nandc->max_cwperpage = 1;

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Early structure initialization

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 7/16/23 15:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Instead of allocating a structure on the stack with random data and then
> expect the callee to perform the initialization (which is, in general,
> error prone), prefer zeroing the structure explicitly at allocation and
> provide the already zeroed area, so no explicit memset operation is
> needed. It is probably safer to do so, so we limit the timeframe when
> dirty data could actually be accessed by mistake.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 12 +++++-------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index cb6ccaa19224..4fc8dafa8f03 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2600,8 +2600,6 @@ static void qcom_parse_instructions(struct nand_chip *chip,
>  	unsigned int op_id;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	memset(q_op, 0, sizeof(*q_op));
> -
>  	for (op_id = 0; op_id < subop->ninstrs; op_id++) {
>  		unsigned int offset, naddrs;
>  		const u8 *addrs;
> @@ -2681,7 +2679,7 @@ static int qcom_read_status_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>  	struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
> -	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
>  	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
>  	unsigned int op_id = 0;
>  	unsigned int len = 0;
> @@ -2744,7 +2742,7 @@ static int qcom_read_id_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_subo
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> -	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
>  	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
>  	unsigned int op_id = 0;
>  	unsigned int len = 0;
> @@ -2795,7 +2793,7 @@ static int qcom_misc_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_sub
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
> -	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op);
> @@ -2838,7 +2836,7 @@ static int qcom_param_page_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip,  const struct nand_
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> -	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
>  	const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
>  	unsigned int op_id = 0;
>  	unsigned int len = 0;
> @@ -2935,7 +2933,7 @@ static int qcom_erase_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_su
>  {
>  	struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip);
>  	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> -	struct qcom_op q_op;
> +	struct qcom_op q_op = {};
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op);

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 7/16/23 15:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
> been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it looks
> a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op structure by
> using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs with
> the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
> right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.
> 
> Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

[Tudor Ambarus]

Hi, Miquel,

On 7/27/23 15:59, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Sadre,
> 
> mani@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:08:43 +0530:
> 
>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:12PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>> The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
>>> been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it looks
>>> a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op structure by
>>> using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs with
>>> the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
>>> right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/
>>> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>  
>> LGTM! But I'm relying on Sadre to test it.
>>
>> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> I don't think I've received feedback from Sadre, I would like to close
> these issues, can you please test and give us feedback?

All patches are pretty straight forward. Let the 0-day bot run with them
and then apply all if no further feedback.

Cheers,
ta

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

[Sricharan Ramabadhran]

Hi Miquel,

On 7/27/2023 8:29 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Sadre,
> 
> mani@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:08:43 +0530:
> 
>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:12PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>> The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
>>> been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it looks
>>> a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op structure by
>>> using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs with
>>> the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
>>> right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/
>>> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
>>
>> LGTM! But I'm relying on Sadre to test it.
>>
>> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> 
> I don't think I've received feedback from Sadre, I would like to close
> these issues, can you please test and give us feedback?
> 

  Sorry for the delay in response. Testing this, will respond back
  shortly today.

Regards,
  Sricharan

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

[Sricharan Ramabadhran]

Hi Miquel,

On 7/28/2023 8:03 AM, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
> 
> On 7/27/2023 8:29 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Hi Sadre,
>>
>> mani@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:08:43 +0530:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:12PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>>> The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
>>>> been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it 
>>>> looks
>>>> a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op 
>>>> structure by
>>>> using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs 
>>>> with
>>>> the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
>>>> right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>>> Closes: 
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/ 
>>>>
>>>> Closes: 
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/ 
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
>>>
>>> LGTM! But I'm relying on Sadre to test it.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
>>
>> I don't think I've received feedback from Sadre, I would like to close
>> these issues, can you please test and give us feedback?
>>
> 
>   Sorry for the delay in response. Testing this, will respond back
>   shortly today.

  Tested this series on ipq8074-hk01 board.
  Tested bootcheck, both /dev/mtd and /dev/mtdblock for data integrity.
  All looks fine. So,

  Tested-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>

Regards,
  Sricharan

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Sricharan,

quic_srichara@quicinc.com wrote on Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:44:37 +0530:

> Hi Miquel,
> 
> On 7/28/2023 8:03 AM, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
> > Hi Miquel,
> > 
> > On 7/27/2023 8:29 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >> Hi Sadre,
> >>
> >> mani@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:08:43 +0530:
> >>  
> >>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:12PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >>>> The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
> >>>> been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it >>>> looks
> >>>> a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op >>>> structure by
> >>>> using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs >>>> with
> >>>> the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
> >>>> right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
> >>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >>>> Closes: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/ >>>>
> >>>> Closes: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/ >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>  
> >>>
> >>> LGTM! But I'm relying on Sadre to test it.
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>  
> >>
> >> I don't think I've received feedback from Sadre, I would like to close
> >> these issues, can you please test and give us feedback?
> >>  
> > 
> >   Sorry for the delay in response. Testing this, will respond back
> >   shortly today.  
> 
>   Tested this series on ipq8074-hk01 board.
>   Tested bootcheck, both /dev/mtd and /dev/mtdblock for data integrity.
>   All looks fine. So,
> 
>   Tested-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>

Thanks for the test! I'll take the series now then.

Thanks,
Miquèl

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Tudor,

tudor.ambarus@linaro.org wrote on Fri, 28 Jul 2023 03:31:41 +0100:

> Hi, Miquel,
> 
> On 7/27/23 15:59, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Sadre,
> > 
> > mani@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:08:43 +0530:
> >   
> >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:12PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >>> The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
> >>> been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it looks
> >>> a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op structure by
> >>> using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs with
> >>> the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
> >>> right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
> >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/
> >>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/
> >>> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>    
> >> LGTM! But I'm relying on Sadre to test it.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>  
> > I don't think I've received feedback from Sadre, I would like to close
> > these issues, can you please test and give us feedback?  
> 
> All patches are pretty straight forward. Let the 0-day bot run with them
> and then apply all if no further feedback.

Thanks a lot for all the review! Fortunately I just received the
Tested-by, otherwise I agree most patches are simple enough (besides
the last one maybe) and 0-day might have done a good first iteration.

Thanks,
Miquèl

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

[Miquel Raynal]

On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 14:46:12 UTC, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
> been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it looks
> a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op structure by
> using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs with
> the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
> right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.
> 
> Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git nand/next.

Miquel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Early structure initialization

[Miquel Raynal]

On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 14:46:11 UTC, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Instead of allocating a structure on the stack with random data and then
> expect the callee to perform the initialization (which is, in general,
> error prone), prefer zeroing the structure explicitly at allocation and
> provide the already zeroed area, so no explicit memset operation is
> needed. It is probably safer to do so, so we limit the timeframe when
> dirty data could actually be accessed by mistake.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git nand/next.

Miquel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 6/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix a typo

[Miquel Raynal]

On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 14:46:10 UTC, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
> 	CHECK: 'tranasction' may be misspelled - perhaps 'transaction'?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git nand/next.

Miquel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 5/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix wrong indentation

[Miquel Raynal]

On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 14:46:09 UTC, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The main "for" loop in qcom_read_status_exec() does guard the following
> to if's which are badly indented. Fix the indentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git nand/next.

Miquel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 4/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix the spacing

[Miquel Raynal]

On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 14:46:08 UTC, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix following checkpatch warning:
> 	"CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines"
> 	"CHECK: Please use a blank line after
> 		function/struct/union/enum declarations"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git nand/next.

Miquel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Use u8 instead of uint8_t

[Miquel Raynal]

On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 14:46:06 UTC, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
>     "CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u8' over 'uint8_t'"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git nand/next.

Miquel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Use the BIT() macro

[Miquel Raynal]

On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 14:46:05 UTC, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Fix the following checkpatch warning:
>     "CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git nand/next.

Miquel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel