* [PATCH v2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable OMAP watchdog support
@ 2023-07-18 14:58 Julien Panis
2023-07-19 10:08 ` Julien Panis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Julien Panis @ 2023-07-18 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, vigneshr, afd, Julien Panis
Increase build and test coverage by enabling support for OMAP watchdog,
as used on TI OMAP based boards.
The watchdog timer is an upward counter capable of generating a pulse on
the reset pin and an interrupt to the device system modules following an
overflow condition.
Signed-off-by: Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com>
---
Enable OMAP watchdog support in multi_v7_defconfig for TI OMAP based boards.
---
Changes in v2:
- Add explanations in commit description.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230718-enable-omap-wd-v1-1-34396f2c76aa@baylibre.com
---
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
index f0800f806b5f..7d93e21e0cb9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
@@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ CONFIG_SAMA5D4_WATCHDOG=y
CONFIG_S3C2410_WATCHDOG=m
CONFIG_DW_WATCHDOG=y
CONFIG_DAVINCI_WATCHDOG=m
+CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG=m
CONFIG_ORION_WATCHDOG=y
CONFIG_RN5T618_WATCHDOG=y
CONFIG_SUNXI_WATCHDOG=y
---
base-commit: fdf0eaf11452d72945af31804e2a1048ee1b574c
change-id: 20230718-enable-omap-wd-6a563c280752
Best regards,
--
Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable OMAP watchdog support
2023-07-18 14:58 [PATCH v2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable OMAP watchdog support Julien Panis
@ 2023-07-19 10:08 ` Julien Panis
2023-07-21 7:38 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Julien Panis @ 2023-07-19 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, vigneshr, afd
On 7/18/23 16:58, Julien Panis wrote:
> Increase build and test coverage by enabling support for OMAP watchdog,
> as used on TI OMAP based boards.
>
> The watchdog timer is an upward counter capable of generating a pulse on
> the reset pin and an interrupt to the device system modules following an
> overflow condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com>
Maybe this patch should not be applied actually. I have 2 questions:
[Q1] Using the following cmd sequence leads to a modified 'multi_v7_defconfig' file:
'make multi_v7_defconfig'
'make savedefconfig'
'mv defconfig arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig'
...even without modifying CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG flag.
I guess it's due to modifications in various Kconfig files (dependencies for instance).
And perhaps it's also due to previous modifications of 'multi_v7_defconfig' file that
were not done by using 'make savedefconfig' (?)
How should I handle that for this patch ? This v2 has been created by modifying
'multi_v7_defconfig' file manually. Using 'make savedefconfig' would be cleaner,
but as a result many flags would be re-organized whereas the commit intends to
enable 1 flag only.
[Q2] I would like to add another flag in order to enable CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP.
Is it better grouping CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG and CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP in
a single commit ? What's recommended ?
Julien Panis
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable OMAP watchdog support
2023-07-19 10:08 ` Julien Panis
@ 2023-07-21 7:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-07-21 8:24 ` Julien Panis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2023-07-21 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julien Panis; +Cc: Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, vigneshr, afd
* Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com> [230719 10:09]:
> On 7/18/23 16:58, Julien Panis wrote:
> > Increase build and test coverage by enabling support for OMAP watchdog,
> > as used on TI OMAP based boards.
> >
> > The watchdog timer is an upward counter capable of generating a pulse on
> > the reset pin and an interrupt to the device system modules following an
> > overflow condition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com>
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Maybe this patch should not be applied actually. I have 2 questions:
>
> [Q1] Using the following cmd sequence leads to a modified 'multi_v7_defconfig' file:
> 'make multi_v7_defconfig'
> 'make savedefconfig'
> 'mv defconfig arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig'
> ...even without modifying CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG flag.
> I guess it's due to modifications in various Kconfig files (dependencies for instance).
> And perhaps it's also due to previous modifications of 'multi_v7_defconfig' file that
> were not done by using 'make savedefconfig' (?)
> How should I handle that for this patch ? This v2 has been created by modifying
> 'multi_v7_defconfig' file manually. Using 'make savedefconfig' would be cleaner,
> but as a result many flags would be re-organized whereas the commit intends to
> enable 1 flag only.
After make savedefconfig you can take a look where the new option got placed
and then throw away the changes and add the entry manually :)
> [Q2] I would like to add another flag in order to enable CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP.
> Is it better grouping CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG and CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP in
> a single commit ? What's recommended ?
Adding both is fine for the defconfig change, just try to place them where
they would end up after savedefconfig to avoid it getting more out of sync.
Regards,
Tony
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable OMAP watchdog support
2023-07-21 7:38 ` Tony Lindgren
@ 2023-07-21 8:24 ` Julien Panis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Julien Panis @ 2023-07-21 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Lindgren; +Cc: Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, vigneshr, afd
On 7/21/23 09:38, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com> [230719 10:09]:
>> On 7/18/23 16:58, Julien Panis wrote:
>>> Increase build and test coverage by enabling support for OMAP watchdog,
>>> as used on TI OMAP based boards.
>>>
>>> The watchdog timer is an upward counter capable of generating a pulse on
>>> the reset pin and an interrupt to the device system modules following an
>>> overflow condition.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com>
> Looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>
>> Maybe this patch should not be applied actually. I have 2 questions:
>>
>> [Q1] Using the following cmd sequence leads to a modified 'multi_v7_defconfig' file:
>> 'make multi_v7_defconfig'
>> 'make savedefconfig'
>> 'mv defconfig arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig'
>> ...even without modifying CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG flag.
>> I guess it's due to modifications in various Kconfig files (dependencies for instance).
>> And perhaps it's also due to previous modifications of 'multi_v7_defconfig' file that
>> were not done by using 'make savedefconfig' (?)
>> How should I handle that for this patch ? This v2 has been created by modifying
>> 'multi_v7_defconfig' file manually. Using 'make savedefconfig' would be cleaner,
>> but as a result many flags would be re-organized whereas the commit intends to
>> enable 1 flag only.
> After make savedefconfig you can take a look where the new option got placed
> and then throw away the changes and add the entry manually :)
>
>> [Q2] I would like to add another flag in order to enable CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP.
>> Is it better grouping CONFIG_OMAP_WATCHDOG and CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP in
>> a single commit ? What's recommended ?
> Adding both is fine for the defconfig change, just try to place them where
> they would end up after savedefconfig to avoid it getting more out of sync.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
OK, thank you for these explanations.
There will be other flags to add (much more than 2 actually !). So, it's not worth merging
this patch. I will send another patch with all the flags that must be set.
Julien
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-21 8:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-18 14:58 [PATCH v2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable OMAP watchdog support Julien Panis
2023-07-19 10:08 ` Julien Panis
2023-07-21 7:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-07-21 8:24 ` Julien Panis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).