Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()

From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
	Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>,
	Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix address parsing within ->exec_op()
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:56:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230728095624.33ffb3ae@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4701576f-5eca-b1e9-5b5c-de1d861e286a@linaro.org>

Hi Tudor,

tudor.ambarus@linaro.org wrote on Fri, 28 Jul 2023 03:31:41 +0100:

> Hi, Miquel,
> 
> On 7/27/23 15:59, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Sadre,
> > 
> > mani@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:08:43 +0530:
> >   
> >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 04:46:12PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >>> The naddrs variable is initialized but not used. Fixing this could have
> >>> been a matter of dropping the variable, but the right way to do it looks
> >>> a bit more complex: we can avoid useless writes to the q_op structure by
> >>> using it. In practice we could even have possible out-of-bound bugs with
> >>> the existing implementation. Let's fix all that by just performing the
> >>> right number of assignments in the addr{1,2}_reg fields.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
> >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131959.PdPSC86K-lkp@intel.com/
> >>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307131730.NOYbcjBr-lkp@intel.com/
> >>> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>    
> >> LGTM! But I'm relying on Sadre to test it.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>  
> > I don't think I've received feedback from Sadre, I would like to close
> > these issues, can you please test and give us feedback?  
> 
> All patches are pretty straight forward. Let the 0-day bot run with them
> and then apply all if no further feedback.

Thanks a lot for all the review! Fortunately I just received the
Tested-by, otherwise I agree most patches are simple enough (besides
the last one maybe) and 0-day might have done a good first iteration.

Thanks,
Miquèl

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel