Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] i2c: mlxbf: Use dev_err_probe in probe function

[Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:36:40AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/08/2023 03:29, Liao Chang wrote:
> > Use the dev_err_probe function instead of dev_err in the probe function
> > so that the printed messge includes the return value and also handles
> > -EPROBE_DEFER nicely.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com>
> 
> ...
> 
> > @@ -2413,10 +2399,8 @@ static int mlxbf_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, mlxbf_i2c_irq,
> >  			       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_PROBE_SHARED,
> >  			       dev_name(dev), priv);
> > -	if (ret < 0) {
> > -		dev_err(dev, "Cannot get irq %d\n", irq);
> > -		return ret;
> > -	}
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Cannot get irq %d\n", irq);
> 
> I don't think this is needed:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230721094641.77189-1-frank.li@vivo.com/

Hmm, that's a bit borderline, I'd say. The change to
devm_request_irq/devm_request_threaded_irq_probe seems like
something for another series. But for now, I think I'll accept
this as it is since it fits within the scope of this current
series.

Andi

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel