Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	kernel-team@android.com,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	yangyicong@huawei.com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based devices
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 12:28:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230821112851.GC19469@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f8f13510-ec6a-b18b-d9ff-9247b250bc03@arm.com>

On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 08:36:28AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 18/08/2023 19:04, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:24:01 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > > This series enables detection of ACPI based TRBE devices via a stand alone
> > > purpose built representative platform device. But as a pre-requisite this
> > > changes coresight_platform_data structure assignment for the TRBE device.
> > > 
> > > This series is based on v6.5-rc5 kernel, is also dependent on the following
> > > EDK2 changes posted earlier by Sami.
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Applied to will (for-next/perf), thanks!
> > 
> > [1/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Refactor arm_spe_acpi_register_device()
> >        https://git.kernel.org/will/c/81e5ee471609
> > [2/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Add a representative platform device for TRBE
> >        https://git.kernel.org/will/c/1aa3d0274a4a
> > [3/4] coresight: trbe: Add a representative coresight_platform_data for TRBE
> >        https://git.kernel.org/will/c/e926b8e9eb40
> 
> This will conflict with what I have (already) sent to Greg for
> coresight/next. Please let me know how you would like handle it

Hmm, the rationale behind your change to make the pdata allocation
per-device in ("coresight: trbe: Allocate platform data per device")
confuses me: with Anshuman's change to allocate the pdata using
devm_kzalloc(), there shouldn't be any connections for the coresight
core to trip over, should there?

It would've been nice to know about the conflict earlier, but since I
think you're away this week and we're likely to hit the merge window
next week, I'm going to drop the coresight patches for now.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-21 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-17  5:54 [PATCH V5 0/4] coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based devices Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-17  5:54 ` [PATCH V5 1/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Refactor arm_spe_acpi_register_device() Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-17  5:54 ` [PATCH V5 2/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Add a representative platform device for TRBE Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-17  5:54 ` [PATCH V5 3/4] coresight: trbe: Add a representative coresight_platform_data " Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-17  5:54 ` [PATCH V5 4/4] coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based TRBE devices Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-18 18:04 ` [PATCH V5 0/4] coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based devices Will Deacon
2023-08-19  7:36   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-21 11:28     ` Will Deacon [this message]
2023-08-27 22:11       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-28  2:17         ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-28 21:35         ` Will Deacon
2023-08-29  8:43           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-28  2:41   ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-28 16:30     ` Will Deacon
2023-08-29  8:45       ` Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230821112851.GC19469@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=sami.mujawar@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox