From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Nikunj Kela <nkela@quicinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Align perf ops to use domain-id as in-parameter
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:26:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230825112633.236607-5-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230825112633.236607-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Most scmi_perf_proto_ops are already using an "u32 domain" as an
in-parameter to indicate what performance domain we shall operate upon.
However, some of the ops are using a "struct device *dev", which means that
an additional OF parsing is needed each time the perf ops gets called, to
find the corresponding domain-id.
To avoid the above, but also to make the code more consistent, let's
replace the in-parameter "struct device *dev" with an "u32 domain". Note
that, this requires us to make some corresponding changes to the scmi
cpufreq driver, so let's do that too.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
Changes in v3:
- Re-based.
---
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 14 +++++++++-----
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 22 ++++------------------
include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
index 7d05d48c0337..125e8a8421fb 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ scmi_get_cpu_power(struct device *cpu_dev, unsigned long *power,
static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- int ret, nr_opp;
+ int ret, nr_opp, domain;
unsigned int latency;
struct device *cpu_dev;
struct scmi_data *priv;
@@ -149,6 +149,10 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return -ENODEV;
}
+ domain = scmi_cpu_domain_id(cpu_dev);
+ if (domain < 0)
+ return domain;
+
priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!priv)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -187,7 +191,7 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
*/
nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
if (nr_opp <= 0) {
- ret = perf_ops->device_opps_add(ph, cpu_dev);
+ ret = perf_ops->device_opps_add(ph, cpu_dev, domain);
if (ret) {
dev_warn(cpu_dev, "failed to add opps to the device\n");
goto out_free_cpumask;
@@ -220,7 +224,7 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
priv->cpu_dev = cpu_dev;
- priv->domain_id = scmi_cpu_domain_id(cpu_dev);
+ priv->domain_id = domain;
policy->driver_data = priv;
policy->freq_table = freq_table;
@@ -228,14 +232,14 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
/* SCMI allows DVFS request for any domain from any CPU */
policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu = true;
- latency = perf_ops->transition_latency_get(ph, cpu_dev);
+ latency = perf_ops->transition_latency_get(ph, domain);
if (!latency)
latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency;
policy->fast_switch_possible =
- perf_ops->fast_switch_possible(ph, cpu_dev);
+ perf_ops->fast_switch_possible(ph, domain);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
index d20bb6b8abfa..092b51cf9596 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
@@ -795,17 +795,13 @@ static int scmi_dev_domain_id(struct device *dev)
}
static int scmi_dvfs_device_opps_add(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
- struct device *dev)
+ struct device *dev, u32 domain)
{
- int idx, ret, domain;
+ int idx, ret;
unsigned long freq;
struct scmi_opp *opp;
struct perf_dom_info *dom;
- domain = scmi_dev_domain_id(dev);
- if (domain < 0)
- return -EINVAL;
-
dom = scmi_perf_domain_lookup(ph, domain);
if (IS_ERR(dom))
return PTR_ERR(dom);
@@ -838,15 +834,10 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_device_opps_add(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
static int
scmi_dvfs_transition_latency_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
- struct device *dev)
+ u32 domain)
{
- int domain;
struct perf_dom_info *dom;
- domain = scmi_dev_domain_id(dev);
- if (domain < 0)
- return -EINVAL;
-
dom = scmi_perf_domain_lookup(ph, domain);
if (IS_ERR(dom))
return PTR_ERR(dom);
@@ -942,15 +933,10 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_est_power_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
}
static bool scmi_fast_switch_possible(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
- struct device *dev)
+ u32 domain)
{
- int domain;
struct perf_dom_info *dom;
- domain = scmi_dev_domain_id(dev);
- if (domain < 0)
- return false;
-
dom = scmi_perf_domain_lookup(ph, domain);
if (IS_ERR(dom))
return false;
diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
index 71923ae63b01..bf6b0be1890e 100644
--- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
+++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
@@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ struct scmi_perf_proto_ops {
u32 *level, bool poll);
int (*device_domain_id)(struct device *dev);
int (*transition_latency_get)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
- struct device *dev);
+ u32 domain);
int (*device_opps_add)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
- struct device *dev);
+ struct device *dev, u32 domain);
int (*freq_set)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 domain,
unsigned long rate, bool poll);
int (*freq_get)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 domain,
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ struct scmi_perf_proto_ops {
int (*est_power_get)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 domain,
unsigned long *rate, unsigned long *power);
bool (*fast_switch_possible)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
- struct device *dev);
+ u32 domain);
enum scmi_power_scale (*power_scale_get)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph);
};
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 11:26 [PATCH v3 00/13] arm_scmi/cpufreq: Add generic performance scaling support Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend perf protocol ops to get number of domains Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend perf protocol ops to get information of a domain Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] cpufreq: scmi: Prepare to move OF parsing of domain-id to cpufreq Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 14:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-08-25 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2023-09-21 14:29 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Align perf ops to use domain-id as in-parameter Viresh Kumar
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop redundant ->device_domain_id() from perf ops Ulf Hansson
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] cpufreq: scmi: Avoid one OF parsing in scmi_get_sharing_cpus() Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 14:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] cpufreq: scmi: Drop redundant ifdef in scmi_cpufreq_probe() Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 11:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 13:02 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 13:29 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add a power-domain-name for a performance-domain Ulf Hansson
2023-09-11 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2023-09-21 11:11 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 13:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 13:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Extend bindings for protocol@13 Ulf Hansson
2023-09-11 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] dt-bindings: power: Clarify performance capabilities of power-domains Ulf Hansson
2023-09-11 14:40 ` Rob Herring
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] cpufreq: scmi: Add support to parse domain-id using #power-domain-cells Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 11:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 14:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] PM: domains: Allow genpd providers to manage OPP tables directly by its FW Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 11:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-21 13:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-21 13:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-08-25 11:26 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] genpd: arm: Add the SCMI performance domain Ulf Hansson
2023-09-14 22:45 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] arm_scmi/cpufreq: Add generic performance scaling support Ulf Hansson
2023-09-18 10:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-19 10:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-09-25 9:39 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230825112633.236607-5-ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nkela@quicinc.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=psodagud@quicinc.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).