From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E742FC46CA1 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:27:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=36Y9epg5CYIFhT4tCi70f7KeDUN9x51nFZLJO5g6jZY=; b=h01JWaYENz7Ajk wPCiBlhF3I24qew8ho6Wi7fkvhO457TrY30GVlIsVnxWCnwRIOhqnOexFdVKooYGPKjFl2Q+2dzxd Ro+2DqyDmP0eEWJb7/jFc3/3mSFeUm5zgkAShqBbwyg2FAyT3SHGczulksZkU3YSemDhIBDSREavy /flFrL7BTtBF0fY3d5QDziaqlJv3NUZWySqbz2EvrxWV9L26YYrk1wiLIev2sChUNftItI3OoDgPY o8kNxZGrK8aitwCGMgtPjOrgDvOys/4BnuOJ/oUHI4xFQ1O8ttAMsZOklyaOCNQ8vsByc6dr4Qks3 upveKaeGhCw0fOiGEdXA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qiBSu-00F5q8-09; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:26:52 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qiBSr-00F5nI-1r for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:26:51 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3339D1FB; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 03:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CEED3F67D; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 03:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:26:42 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Cristian Marussi , Nikunj Kela , Sudeep Holla , Prasad Sodagudi , Alexandre Torgue , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] arm_scmi/cpufreq: Add generic performance scaling support Message-ID: <20230918102642.icz7gywqmakaatgc@bogus> References: <20230825112633.236607-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230918_032649_731959_E98EE9D7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 33.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:45:02AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Sudeep, Christian, > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:26, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > > Changes in v3: > > - Re-based upon the for-next/scmi/updates branch. > > - Re-ordered some of the patches in the series, to eas review. > > - Added some new DT doc patches in the series, according to comments. > > - Fixed other comments, see version history for each patch. > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Split up the series, to get the basic support in place as the first > > step. The part that remains is the integration with the OPP library, to > > allow consumer drivers to change performance level using the OPP lib. > > - Re-based on top v6.5-rc1. > > - Other changes will be described for each patch. > > > > The current SCMI performance scaling support is limited to cpufreq. This series > > extends the support, so it can be used for all kind of devices and not only for > > CPUs. > > > > The changes are spread over a couple of different subsystems, although the > > changes that affects the other subsystems than the arm_scmi directory are > > mostly smaller, except for last patch which is in the new genpd directory. > > > > The series is based upon the for-next/scmi/updates branch, but to enable the > > genpd provider in patch 13 (the actual scmi performance domain driver) to be > > placed in the new genpd directory, I have also merged an immutable branch [1], > > which is queued for v6.6. > > > > Note that, I am runing this on the Qemu virt platform with Optee running an SCMI > > server. If you want some more details about my test setup, I can share this with > > you, just let me know. > > > > Looking forward to your feedback! > > > > Kind regards > > Ulf Hansson > > > > [1] > > git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/people/ulf.hansson/linux-pm.git genpd_create_dir > > > > > > Ulf Hansson (13): > > firmware: arm_scmi: Extend perf protocol ops to get number of domains > > firmware: arm_scmi: Extend perf protocol ops to get information of a > > domain > > cpufreq: scmi: Prepare to move OF parsing of domain-id to cpufreq > > firmware: arm_scmi: Align perf ops to use domain-id as in-parameter > > firmware: arm_scmi: Drop redundant ->device_domain_id() from perf ops > > cpufreq: scmi: Avoid one OF parsing in scmi_get_sharing_cpus() > > cpufreq: scmi: Drop redundant ifdef in scmi_cpufreq_probe() > > dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add a power-domain-name for a > > performance-domain > > dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Extend bindings for protocol@13 > > dt-bindings: power: Clarify performance capabilities of power-domains > > cpufreq: scmi: Add support to parse domain-id using > > #power-domain-cells > > PM: domains: Allow genpd providers to manage OPP tables directly by > > its FW > > genpd: arm: Add the SCMI performance domain > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml | 4 +- > > .../bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 11 +- > > .../bindings/power/power-domain.yaml | 17 +- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 11 +- > > drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 55 +++++-- > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig | 12 ++ > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 90 +++++------ > > drivers/genpd/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/genpd/arm/Makefile | 3 + > > drivers/genpd/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 5 + > > include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 18 ++- > > 13 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 drivers/genpd/arm/Makefile > > create mode 100644 drivers/genpd/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c > > > > Unless you have some additional comments, I think patch 1 -> 12 should > be ready to be applied to your scmi tree, as is. I tried to apply it > today and did not encounter any problem. > Sorry for the delay, was off few days last week. I will take a look at the series later this week > Patch 13 needs a rebase so I will submit a new version of it. For you > to apply it to your tree, you need to move your scmi branch to > v6.6-rc2 (on Monday), would that be okay for you to manage? > Sure I can rebase on -rc2. I assume Arnd is aware of the dependency and must be OK with that. The general preference/expectation is -rc1 but I understand the exception this time. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel