From: Guo Hui <guohui@uniontech.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: quic_jiles@quicinc.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
wangxiaohua@uniontech.com, Guo Hui <guohui@uniontech.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Optimize querying asid from reserved_asids
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:51:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230927055106.14635-1-guohui@uniontech.com> (raw)
Move reserved_asids updates into function flush_context. When
asid_generation increases, reserved_asids are updated synchronously.
The execution frequency of function flush_context is far less than
that of function check_update_reserved_asid. In function
check_update_reserved_asid, you only need to query whether it is
in reserved_asids based on the new newasid, and there is no need
to update it.
In the function check_update_reserved_asid, among all the times
reserved_asids are hit, the probability that newasid is equal to
the reserved_asids of the current CPU is about greater than 70%.
Signed-off-by: Guo Hui <guohui@uniontech.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
index 188197590fc9..76e0beb14466 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void set_reserved_asid_bits(void)
#define asid_gen_match(asid) \
(!(((asid) ^ atomic64_read(&asid_generation)) >> asid_bits))
-static void flush_context(void)
+static void flush_context(u64 generation)
{
int i;
u64 asid;
@@ -120,6 +120,8 @@ static void flush_context(void)
*/
if (asid == 0)
asid = per_cpu(reserved_asids, i);
+
+ asid = generation | (asid & ~ASID_MASK);
__set_bit(ctxid2asid(asid), asid_map);
per_cpu(reserved_asids, i) = asid;
}
@@ -131,24 +133,21 @@ static void flush_context(void)
cpumask_setall(&tlb_flush_pending);
}
-static bool check_update_reserved_asid(u64 asid, u64 newasid)
+static bool check_update_reserved_asid(u64 newasid)
{
- int cpu;
+ int cpu, cur_cpu = smp_processor_id();
bool hit = false;
- /*
- * Iterate over the set of reserved ASIDs looking for a match.
- * If we find one, then we can update our mm to use newasid
- * (i.e. the same ASID in the current generation) but we can't
- * exit the loop early, since we need to ensure that all copies
- * of the old ASID are updated to reflect the mm. Failure to do
- * so could result in us missing the reserved ASID in a future
- * generation.
- */
+ if (per_cpu(reserved_asids, cur_cpu) == newasid)
+ return true;
+
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- if (per_cpu(reserved_asids, cpu) == asid) {
+ if (cpu == cur_cpu)
+ continue;
+
+ if (per_cpu(reserved_asids, cpu) == newasid) {
hit = true;
- per_cpu(reserved_asids, cpu) = newasid;
+ break;
}
}
@@ -168,7 +167,7 @@ static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
* If our current ASID was active during a rollover, we
* can continue to use it and this was just a false alarm.
*/
- if (check_update_reserved_asid(asid, newasid))
+ if (check_update_reserved_asid(newasid))
return newasid;
/*
@@ -201,7 +200,7 @@ static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
/* We're out of ASIDs, so increment the global generation count */
generation = atomic64_add_return_relaxed(ASID_FIRST_VERSION,
&asid_generation);
- flush_context();
+ flush_context(generation);
/* We have more ASIDs than CPUs, so this will always succeed */
asid = find_next_zero_bit(asid_map, NUM_USER_ASIDS, 1);
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-27 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 5:51 Guo Hui [this message]
2023-09-29 16:51 ` [PATCH] arm64: mm: Optimize querying asid from reserved_asids Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230927055106.14635-1-guohui@uniontech.com \
--to=guohui@uniontech.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=wangxiaohua@uniontech.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox