From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Xu Zhao <zhaoxu.35@bytedance.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: arm64: vgic: Make kvm_vgic_inject_irq() take a vcpu pointer
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:09:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230927090911.3355209-2-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230927090911.3355209-1-maz@kernel.org>
Passing a vcpu_id to kvm_vgic_inject_irq() is silly for two reasons:
- we often confuse vcpu_id and vcpu_idx
- we eventually have to convert it back to a vcpu
- we can't count
Instead, pass a vcpu pointer, which is unambiguous. A NULL vcpu
is also allowed for interrupts that are not private to a vcpu
(such as SPIs).
Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c | 12 +++++-------
include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 4 ++--
6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
index 6dcdae4d38cb..1f828f3b854c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
timer_ctx->irq.level);
if (!userspace_irqchip(vcpu->kvm)) {
- ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
+ ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu,
timer_irq(timer_ctx),
timer_ctx->irq.level,
timer_ctx);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 4866b3f7b4ea..fa21fb15e927 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -1134,27 +1134,23 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
bool line_status)
{
u32 irq = irq_level->irq;
- unsigned int irq_type, vcpu_idx, irq_num;
- int nrcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
+ unsigned int irq_type, vcpu_id, irq_num;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
bool level = irq_level->level;
irq_type = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_MASK;
- vcpu_idx = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK;
- vcpu_idx += ((irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_MASK) * (KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK + 1);
+ vcpu_id = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK;
+ vcpu_id += ((irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU2_MASK) * (KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK + 1);
irq_num = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_NUM_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_NUM_MASK;
- trace_kvm_irq_line(irq_type, vcpu_idx, irq_num, irq_level->level);
+ trace_kvm_irq_line(irq_type, vcpu_id, irq_num, irq_level->level);
switch (irq_type) {
case KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_CPU:
if (irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
return -ENXIO;
- if (vcpu_idx >= nrcpus)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_idx);
+ vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, vcpu_id);
if (!vcpu)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1166,17 +1162,14 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
return -ENXIO;
- if (vcpu_idx >= nrcpus)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_idx);
+ vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, vcpu_id);
if (!vcpu)
return -EINVAL;
if (irq_num < VGIC_NR_SGIS || irq_num >= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
return -EINVAL;
- return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq_num, level, NULL);
+ return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, vcpu, irq_num, level, NULL);
case KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SPI:
if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
return -ENXIO;
@@ -1184,7 +1177,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
if (irq_num < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
return -EINVAL;
- return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, irq_num, level, NULL);
+ return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, NULL, irq_num, level, NULL);
}
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index 6b066e04dc5d..3afb281ed8d2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static void kvm_pmu_update_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
pmu->irq_level = overflow;
if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))) {
- int ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
+ int ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu,
pmu->irq_num, overflow, pmu);
WARN_ON(ret);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
index 475059bacedf..8c711deb25aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static int vgic_irqfd_set_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
if (!vgic_valid_spi(kvm, spi_id))
return -EINVAL;
- return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi_id, level, NULL);
+ return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, NULL, spi_id, level, NULL);
}
/**
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
index 8be4c1ebdec2..db2a95762b1b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
/**
* kvm_vgic_inject_irq - Inject an IRQ from a device to the vgic
* @kvm: The VM structure pointer
- * @cpuid: The CPU for PPIs
+ * @vcpu: The CPU for PPIs or NULL for global interrupts
* @intid: The INTID to inject a new state to.
* @level: Edge-triggered: true: to trigger the interrupt
* false: to ignore the call
@@ -436,24 +436,22 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
* level-sensitive interrupts. You can think of the level parameter as 1
* being HIGH and 0 being LOW and all devices being active-HIGH.
*/
-int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
- bool level, void *owner)
+int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ unsigned int intid, bool level, void *owner)
{
- struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct vgic_irq *irq;
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
- trace_vgic_update_irq_pending(cpuid, intid, level);
-
ret = vgic_lazy_init(kvm);
if (ret)
return ret;
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpuid);
if (!vcpu && intid < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
return -EINVAL;
+ trace_vgic_update_irq_pending(vcpu ? vcpu->vcpu_idx : 0, intid, level);
+
irq = vgic_get_irq(kvm, vcpu, intid);
if (!irq)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 5b27f94d4fad..8cc38e836f54 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -375,8 +375,8 @@ int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm);
int kvm_vgic_hyp_init(void);
void kvm_vgic_init_cpu_hardware(void);
-int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
- bool level, void *owner);
+int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ unsigned int intid, bool level, void *owner);
int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
u32 vintid, struct irq_ops *ops);
int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-27 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 9:09 [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: arm64: Accelerate lookup of vcpus by MPIDR values (and other fixes) Marc Zyngier
2023-09-27 9:09 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-09-27 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Treat the collection target address as a vcpu_id Marc Zyngier
2023-09-27 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Refactor GICv3 SGI generation Marc Zyngier
2023-09-27 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v2: Use cpuid from userspace as vcpu_id Marc Zyngier
2023-09-27 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: arm64: vgic: Use vcpu_idx for the debug information Marc Zyngier
2023-09-27 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu_idx for invalidation tracking Marc Zyngier
2023-09-27 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: arm64: Simplify kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff() Marc Zyngier
2023-09-27 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: arm64: Build MPIDR to vcpu index cache at runtime Marc Zyngier
2023-09-27 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: arm64: Fast-track kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu() when mpidr_data is available Marc Zyngier
2023-09-27 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Optimize affinity-based SGI injection Marc Zyngier
2023-09-27 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: arm64: Clarify the ordering requirements for vcpu/RD creation Marc Zyngier
2023-09-30 18:27 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: arm64: Accelerate lookup of vcpus by MPIDR values (and other fixes) Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230927090911.3355209-2-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhaoxu.35@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).