linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	D Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: smp: Don't directly call arch_smp_send_reschedule() for wakeup
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2023 09:45:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231002094526.2.I2e6d22fc42ccbf6b26465a28a10e36e05ccf3075@changeid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231002094526.1.Ie8f760213053e3d11592f892b30912dbac6b8b48@changeid>

In commit 2b2d0a7a96ab ("arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI") we
started using a scheduler IPI to avoid a dedicated reschedule. When we
did this, we used arch_smp_send_reschedule() directly rather than
calling smp_send_reschedule(). The only difference is that calling
arch_smp_send_reschedule() directly avoids tracing. Presumably we
_don't_ want to avoid tracing here, so switch to
smp_send_reschedule().

Fixes: 2b2d0a7a96ab ("arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
I don't 100% know if this is correct and I don't have any hardware
that uses the "ACPI parking protocol", but I think it's right. My main
incentive for this is that it makes it easier to backport pseudo-NMI
to kernels that don't have arch_smp_send_reschedule(), but I think
it's also more correct.

If for some reason we truly did want to avoid tracing here, please
shout and we can drop this patch.

 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 0a6002243a8c..b530d8ef9c1d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(unsigned int cpu)
 	 * We use a scheduler IPI to wake the CPU as this avoids the need for a
 	 * dedicated IPI and we can safely handle spurious scheduler IPIs.
 	 */
-	arch_smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
+	smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
 }
 #endif
 
-- 
2.42.0.582.g8ccd20d70d-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-02 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-02 16:45 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW Douglas Anderson
2023-10-02 16:45 ` Douglas Anderson [this message]
2023-10-02 17:25   ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: smp: Don't directly call arch_smp_send_reschedule() for wakeup Mark Rutland
2023-10-02 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW Mark Rutland
2023-10-02 19:16   ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-03 12:29     ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-03 13:43       ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-03 16:32         ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-03 19:32           ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-04  9:59             ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-04 10:15               ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-04 14:04                 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-05 10:27                   ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-05 15:34                     ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-06 12:19                       ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-06 10:20                     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-06 22:17                       ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-06  9:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-06 10:20   ` Chen-Yu Tsai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231002094526.2.I2e6d22fc42ccbf6b26465a28a10e36e05ccf3075@changeid \
    --to=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wenst@chromium.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).