Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: ankita@nvidia.com
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, aniketa@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com,
	kwankhede@nvidia.com, targupta@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
	acurrid@nvidia.com, apopple@nvidia.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
	danw@nvidia.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:27:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231012122701.GA11824@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230907181459.18145-3-ankita@nvidia.com>

On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 11:14:59AM -0700, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> 
> Linux allows device drivers to map IO memory on a per-page basis using
> "write combining" or WC. This is often done using
> pgprot_writecombing(). The driver knows which pages can support WC
> access and the proper programming model to generate this IO. Generally
> the use case is to boost performance by using write combining to
> generate larger PCIe MemWr TLPs.
> 
> Allow VMs to select DEVICE_* or NORMAL_NC on a page by page basis for
> all IO memory. This puts the VM in charge of the memory attributes,
> and removes the KVM override to DEVICE_nGnRE.
> 
> Ultimately this makes pgprot_writecombing() work correctly in VMs and
> allows drivers like mlx5 to fully operate their HW.
> 
> After some discussions with ARM and CPU architects we reached the
> conclusion there was no need for KVM to prevent the VM from selecting
> between DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory in VMs. There was a fear
> that NORMAL_NC could result in uncontained failures, but upon deeper
> analysis it turns out there are already possible cases for uncontained
> failures with DEVICE types too. Ultimately the platform must be
> implemented in a way that ensures that all DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC
> accesses have no uncontained failures.
> 
> Fortunately real platforms do tend to implement this.
> 
> This patch makes the VM's memory attributes behave as follows:
> 
>  S1           |   S2          |  Result
>  NORMAL-WB    |  NORMAL-NC    |  NORMAL-NC
>  NORMAL-WT    |  NORMAL-NC    |  NORMAL-NC
>  NORMAL-NC    |  NORMAL-NC    |  NORMAL-NC
>  DEVICE<attr> |  NORMAL-NC    |  DEVICE<attr>
> 
> See section D8.5.5 of DDI0487_I_a_a-profile_architecture_reference_manual.pdf
> for details.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c    | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index fde4186cc387..c247e5f29d5a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@
>   * Memory types for Stage-2 translation
>   */
>  #define MT_S2_NORMAL		0xf
> +#define MT_S2_NORMAL_NC	0x5
>  #define MT_S2_DEVICE_nGnRE	0x1
>  
>  /*
> @@ -154,6 +155,7 @@
>   * Stage-2 enforces Normal-WB and Device-nGnRE
>   */
>  #define MT_S2_FWB_NORMAL	6
> +#define MT_S2_FWB_NORMAL_NC	5
>  #define MT_S2_FWB_DEVICE_nGnRE	1
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index ccd291b6893d..a80949002191 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static int stage2_set_prot_attr(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, enum kvm_pgtable_prot p
>  				kvm_pte_t *ptep)
>  {
>  	bool device = prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE;
> -	kvm_pte_t attr = device ? KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, DEVICE_nGnRE) :
> +	kvm_pte_t attr = device ? KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL_NC) :
>  			    KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL);
>  	u32 sh = KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_SH_IS;

I think this is putting the policy into the low-level page-table code,
which isn't where it belongs. KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE means that the
mapping should be created with device attributes. If you want other
attributes, then please introduce another entry to 'kvm_pgtable_prot'
and pass that instead (e.g. KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NC, which coincidentally
we already have in Android [1] ;).

Will

[1] https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/72cc19df8b71095f9740ff0ca6a75bf7ed27b0cd%5E%21/

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-12 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-07 18:14 [PATCH v1 0/2] KVM: arm64: support write combining and cachable IO memory in VMs ankita
2023-09-07 18:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: arm64: determine memory type from VMA ankita
2023-09-07 19:12   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-05 16:15   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-05 16:54     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-10 14:25       ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-10 15:05         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-10 17:19           ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-10 18:23             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 17:45               ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-11 18:38                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 16:16                   ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-10  3:49                     ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-03-19 13:38                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-23 13:20   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-09-07 18:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory ankita
2023-09-08 16:40   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-11 14:57   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-09-11 17:20     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-13 15:26       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-09-13 18:54         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-26  8:31           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-09-26 12:25             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-26 13:52             ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-26 16:12               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-05  9:56               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-05 11:56                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-05 14:08                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-12 12:35                 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 13:20                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 14:29                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-12 13:53                   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-12 14:48                     ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 15:44                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 16:39                         ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 18:36                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-13  9:29                             ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 17:26                       ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-13  9:29                         ` Will Deacon
2023-10-13 13:08                           ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-13 13:45                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-19 11:07                               ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-19 11:51                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-20 11:21                                   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-20 11:47                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-20 14:03                                       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-20 14:28                                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-19 13:35                                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-13 15:28                             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-19 11:12                               ` Catalin Marinas
2023-11-09 15:34                             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-11-10 14:26                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13  0:42                                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-11-13 17:41                               ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-12 12:27   ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231012122701.GA11824@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=danw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox