From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: ankita@nvidia.com
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, aniketa@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com,
kwankhede@nvidia.com, targupta@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
acurrid@nvidia.com, apopple@nvidia.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
danw@nvidia.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:27:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231012122701.GA11824@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230907181459.18145-3-ankita@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 11:14:59AM -0700, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
>
> Linux allows device drivers to map IO memory on a per-page basis using
> "write combining" or WC. This is often done using
> pgprot_writecombing(). The driver knows which pages can support WC
> access and the proper programming model to generate this IO. Generally
> the use case is to boost performance by using write combining to
> generate larger PCIe MemWr TLPs.
>
> Allow VMs to select DEVICE_* or NORMAL_NC on a page by page basis for
> all IO memory. This puts the VM in charge of the memory attributes,
> and removes the KVM override to DEVICE_nGnRE.
>
> Ultimately this makes pgprot_writecombing() work correctly in VMs and
> allows drivers like mlx5 to fully operate their HW.
>
> After some discussions with ARM and CPU architects we reached the
> conclusion there was no need for KVM to prevent the VM from selecting
> between DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory in VMs. There was a fear
> that NORMAL_NC could result in uncontained failures, but upon deeper
> analysis it turns out there are already possible cases for uncontained
> failures with DEVICE types too. Ultimately the platform must be
> implemented in a way that ensures that all DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC
> accesses have no uncontained failures.
>
> Fortunately real platforms do tend to implement this.
>
> This patch makes the VM's memory attributes behave as follows:
>
> S1 | S2 | Result
> NORMAL-WB | NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC
> NORMAL-WT | NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC
> NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC
> DEVICE<attr> | NORMAL-NC | DEVICE<attr>
>
> See section D8.5.5 of DDI0487_I_a_a-profile_architecture_reference_manual.pdf
> for details.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index fde4186cc387..c247e5f29d5a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@
> * Memory types for Stage-2 translation
> */
> #define MT_S2_NORMAL 0xf
> +#define MT_S2_NORMAL_NC 0x5
> #define MT_S2_DEVICE_nGnRE 0x1
>
> /*
> @@ -154,6 +155,7 @@
> * Stage-2 enforces Normal-WB and Device-nGnRE
> */
> #define MT_S2_FWB_NORMAL 6
> +#define MT_S2_FWB_NORMAL_NC 5
> #define MT_S2_FWB_DEVICE_nGnRE 1
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index ccd291b6893d..a80949002191 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static int stage2_set_prot_attr(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, enum kvm_pgtable_prot p
> kvm_pte_t *ptep)
> {
> bool device = prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE;
> - kvm_pte_t attr = device ? KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, DEVICE_nGnRE) :
> + kvm_pte_t attr = device ? KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL_NC) :
> KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL);
> u32 sh = KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_SH_IS;
I think this is putting the policy into the low-level page-table code,
which isn't where it belongs. KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE means that the
mapping should be created with device attributes. If you want other
attributes, then please introduce another entry to 'kvm_pgtable_prot'
and pass that instead (e.g. KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NC, which coincidentally
we already have in Android [1] ;).
Will
[1] https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/72cc19df8b71095f9740ff0ca6a75bf7ed27b0cd%5E%21/
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-07 18:14 [PATCH v1 0/2] KVM: arm64: support write combining and cachable IO memory in VMs ankita
2023-09-07 18:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: arm64: determine memory type from VMA ankita
2023-09-07 19:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-05 16:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-05 16:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-10 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-10 15:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-10 17:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-10 18:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 17:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-11 18:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 16:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-10 3:49 ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-03-19 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-23 13:20 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-09-07 18:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory ankita
2023-09-08 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-11 14:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-09-11 17:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-13 15:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-09-13 18:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-26 8:31 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-09-26 12:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-26 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-26 16:12 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-05 9:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-05 11:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-05 14:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-12 12:35 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 13:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 14:29 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-12 13:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-12 14:48 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 15:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 16:39 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 18:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-13 9:29 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 17:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-13 9:29 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-13 13:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-13 13:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-19 11:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-19 11:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-20 11:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-20 11:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-20 14:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-20 14:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-19 13:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-13 15:28 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-19 11:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-11-09 15:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-11-10 14:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 0:42 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-11-13 17:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-12 12:27 ` Will Deacon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231012122701.GA11824@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox