Re: [PATCH] mfd: Use device_get_match_data()

From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Use device_get_match_data()
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:17:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231013101734.GJ8314@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK22vWx1VPnrwEh+N-6vy5a7npFSW-=gp1uabTPSG2PpA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 4:26 AM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:14 AM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Use preferred device_get_match_data() instead of of_match_device() to
> > > > get the driver match data. With this, adjust the includes to explicitly
> > > > include the correct headers.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c           | 22 +++-------------------
> > >
> > > I'd keep the error message, but otherwise for axp20x,
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> > >
> > > >  drivers/mfd/hi6421-pmic-core.c |  9 +++------
> > > >  drivers/mfd/mxs-lradc.c        |  9 ++-------
> > > >  drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c   |  6 ++++--
> > > >  drivers/mfd/qcom_rpm.c         |  8 ++++----
> > > >  drivers/mfd/tps65910.c         | 11 ++---------
> > > >  drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c    |  9 +++------
> > > >  drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c      | 10 +++++-----
> > > >  8 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> >
> > FYI, this patch is not in my inbox.
> 
> There seems to be some issue with kernel.org delivering my mails. You
> are not the only one. I thought it was just ones with large numbers of
> recipients, but seems to be something else. Konstantin has been
> looking into it. Do you see any pattern of mails you do receive from
> me? Sent via google vs. kernel.org?

How would I know which emails I haven't received from you? :)

This is the only one that I'm aware of.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel