From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D71C5AD4C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 13:54:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=nnPZsuq9Sjs/ig65RPlqPUhTuzzVMXR9Qp8axvsm4Zs=; b=VFFkuBB7ktYLt/ rwP02jTGSSaC0Q8nYyxqrLXjJhY1aebES0ZWs+CbGNroMHg76E8kpIuFg5yDJ5RhfMWoe8jqDrm1h QicJTk8c0epS48TlnJxFrObrnbAOBGk2oByHl3Te+9p5uE1PsXR+sKjIzEP0TufYCs6/CMSmVfI/+ VhTu/3vjcpqGP08bp8kG/qzkoqaWTjDSkEysfMY6XoBbH83GYTUtJL6riSm4/m3inRJDOTE8/D1jb smPA9v8VaENrmsTWKeMw+3K+VlQvCkTlVLNk890yRNrFPKZZ8tICgr9aAc1shDfjkkiJJrTO+cdCx PJFsKL68TavUiM0fzUwQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1r6A9Q-004xSa-0H; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 13:53:52 +0000 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([213.167.242.64]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1r6A9M-004xRh-1s; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 13:53:50 +0000 Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (213-243-189-158.bb.dnainternet.fi [213.243.189.158]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73D21E52; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:53:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1700747595; bh=5TiUrShDodvlqY5geajHll5Q6vI9HOwA3wBbcos2dC8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jVLCBZDseUOrzUwy2DDcSAReWnc9HxHPxwxAlwZnB6Njqy4RBifc2mAytvAxNFRgB qohjo7KIzEiB84s+a3HN8WxXSKusoRK5cEJ6UHMsBUHvASmrv5tNfE5nDCadMXR06r gsRT3PTZkobfJ01+dgUMuHVfOcZo3Tr83+qgxZhU= Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:53:54 +0200 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Umang Jain Cc: Greg KH , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, kernel-list@raspberrypi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, Dave Stevenson , "Ricardo B . Marliere" , Dan Carpenter , Stefan Wahren Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixup! staging: vc04_services: bcm2835-isp: Add a more complex ISP processing component Message-ID: <20231123135354.GE16377@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20231109210309.638594-11-umang.jain@ideasonboard.com> <20231113140755.425365-1-umang.jain@ideasonboard.com> <2023112352-ravishing-garter-c9fc@gregkh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2023112352-ravishing-garter-c9fc@gregkh> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231123_055348_756454_10FBC26A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.67 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:56:07PM +0000, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:07:55AM -0500, Umang Jain wrote: > > Setup DMA Mask > > --- > > I realised while (re)creating the test branches (sent in reply to the cover > > letter), I missed to squash this hunk in > > "staging: vc04_services: bcm2835-isp: Add a more complex ISP processing component" > > before sending out the series. > > > > Sending it as a fixup! for now. > > What does that mean? What can I do with this? Umang, we don't do that for upstream kernel development. If a patch needs a new version, you should send a new version. In some subsystems maintainers will prefer if you only resubmit the offending patch when the series is large (as a "vN.1" instead of a vN+1), while in other cases resending the whole series is preferred. Greg, I don't think Umang wanted you to do anything with this patch :-) This was meant to tell reviewer that the issue was known already. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel