From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/13] arm64: Add MIDR-based override infrastructure
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 11:45:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231127114559.990314-11-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231127114559.990314-1-maz@kernel.org>
In order to be able to use the override infrastructure to "fix"
CPUs that have deviated from the architecture spec, add a new
pile of hacks on top of the existing one, allowing a feature
to be overriden based on matching a MIDR list.
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c
index 7b5b9dc20e6b..57c145bf50b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c
@@ -321,6 +321,23 @@ static __init void parse_cmdline(void)
__parse_cmdline(prop, true);
}
+struct midr_override_data {
+ const char feature[FTR_ALIAS_OPTION_LEN];
+ const struct midr_range ranges[];
+};
+
+static const struct midr_override_data * const midr_ovr_data[] __initconst = {
+};
+
+static void __init apply_midr_overrides(void)
+{
+ const u64 midr = read_cpuid_id();
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(midr_ovr_data); i++)
+ if (is_midr_in_range_list(midr, midr_ovr_data[i]->ranges))
+ __parse_cmdline(midr_ovr_data[i]->feature, false);
+}
+
/* Keep checkers quiet */
void init_feature_override(u64 boot_status);
@@ -337,6 +354,8 @@ asmlinkage void __init init_feature_override(u64 boot_status)
__boot_status = boot_status;
+ apply_midr_overrides();
+
parse_cmdline();
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regs); i++) {
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-27 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 11:45 [PATCH v3 00/13] arm64: Add support for FEAT_E2H0, or lack thereof Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] arm64: Add macro to compose a sysreg field value Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] arm64: cpufeatures: Correctly handle signed values Marc Zyngier
2023-12-11 12:24 ` Will Deacon
2024-01-08 17:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-09 11:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-30 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] arm64: cpufeature: Correctly display signed override values Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] arm64: sysreg: Add layout for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] arm64: cpufeature: Add ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 handling Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] arm64: cpufeature: Detect E2H0 not being implemented Marc Zyngier
2023-12-11 12:42 ` Will Deacon
2024-01-09 15:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] arm64: cpufeature: Detect HCR_EL2.NV1 being RES0 Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] arm64: Add override for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] arm64: Add MIDR-based overrides " Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] KVM: arm64: Expose ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 to guests Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] KVM: arm64: Force guest's HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 when NV1 is not implemented Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231127114559.990314-11-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).