linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, mshavit@google.com,
	eric.auger@redhat.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
	jiangkunkun@huawei.com, zhukeqian1@huawei.com,
	linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enforce dirty tracking in domain attach/alloc
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:48:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231129194850.GD436702@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231128094940.1344-6-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 09:49:40AM +0000, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> @@ -2701,6 +2703,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>  	master = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>  	smmu = master->smmu;
>  
> +	if (domain->dirty_ops && !arm_smmu_dbm_capable(smmu))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +

This is not necessary, a domain can be attached to a single smmu and
finalize was run on that smmu already. So dirty ops should only be set
if this is a S1 domain finalized ona smmu that was dbm capable.

Otherwise none of this makes any sense.

> @@ -3104,6 +3115,9 @@ arm_smmu_domain_alloc_user(struct device *dev, u32 flags,
>  
>  	smmu_domain->domain.type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED;
>  	smmu_domain->domain.ops = arm_smmu_ops.default_domain_ops;
> +	if (enforce_dirty)
> +		smmu_domain->domain.dirty_ops = &arm_smmu_dirty_ops;

Ah, this seems in the wrong place, perhaps that is the confusion
everywhere?

If the finalize actually enables dirty tracking in the pgtbl_ops then
it should set the diryty_ops, they should not be set in alloc_user.

Specifically, a S2 domain should never have dirty_ops set.

IOW if domain.dirty_ops != NULL then pgtbl_ops != NULL && pgtbl_ops->read_and_clear_dirty

Thus no need to have all the other prints/etc then.

So I'd move this into finalize.

> @@ -4152,11 +4166,13 @@ static void arm_smmu_get_httu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 reg)
>  
>  	if (smmu->dev->of_node)
>  		smmu->features |= features;
> -	else if (features != fw_features)
> +	else if (features != fw_features) {
>  		/* ACPI IORT sets the HTTU bits */
>  		dev_warn(smmu->dev,
> -			 "IDR0.HTTU overridden by FW configuration (0x%x)\n",
> +			 "IDR0.HTTU not overridden by FW configuration (0x%x)\n",
>  			 fw_features);
> +		smmu->features |= features;
> +	}
>  }

Is this hunk misplaced?

Jason

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-29 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-28  9:49 [PATCH 0/5] iommu/smmuv3: Add IOMMUFD dirty tracking support for SMMUv3 Shameer Kolothum
2023-11-28  9:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add feature detection for HTTU Shameer Kolothum
2023-11-29 19:49   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-28  9:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable HTTU for stage1 with io-pgtable mapping Shameer Kolothum
2023-11-29 19:30   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-30  9:17     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-11-28  9:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add read_and_clear_dirty() support Shameer Kolothum
2023-11-29 19:35   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-30  9:05     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-11-28  9:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add set_dirty_tracking() support Shameer Kolothum
2023-11-29 19:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-30  8:56     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-11-30 12:54       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-30 14:04         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-12-14 16:23         ` Joao Martins
2023-11-28  9:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enforce dirty tracking in domain attach/alloc Shameer Kolothum
2023-11-29 19:48   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-11-30  9:01     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-12-14 16:29   ` Joao Martins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231129194850.GD436702@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mshavit@google.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).