From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
vdonnefort@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: vgic: Simplify kvm_vgic_destroy()
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:11:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231207151201.3028710-2-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231207151201.3028710-1-maz@kernel.org>
When destroying a vgic, we have rather cumbersome rules about
when slots_lock and config_lock are held, resulting in fun
buglets.
The first port of call is to simplify kvm_vgic_map_resources()
so that there is only one call to kvm_vgic_destroy() instead of
two, with the second only holding half of the locks.
For that, we kill the non-locking primitive and move the call
outside of the locking altogether. This doesn't change anything
(we re-acquire the locks and teardown the whole vgic), and
simplifies the code significantly.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index c8c3cb812783..ad7e86879eb9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -382,26 +382,24 @@ void kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vgic_cpu->rd_iodev.base_addr = VGIC_ADDR_UNDEF;
}
-static void __kvm_vgic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
+void kvm_vgic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
unsigned long i;
- lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
vgic_debug_destroy(kvm);
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(vcpu);
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
+
kvm_vgic_dist_destroy(kvm);
-}
-void kvm_vgic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
- mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
- __kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
}
/**
@@ -469,25 +467,26 @@ int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm)
type = VGIC_V3;
}
- if (ret) {
- __kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
+ if (ret)
goto out;
- }
+
dist->ready = true;
dist_base = dist->vgic_dist_base;
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
ret = vgic_register_dist_iodev(kvm, dist_base, type);
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret)
kvm_err("Unable to register VGIC dist MMIO regions\n");
- kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
- return ret;
+ goto out_slots;
out:
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
+out_slots:
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
+
+ if (ret)
+ kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
+
return ret;
}
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-07 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-07 15:11 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: vgic fixes for 6.7 Marc Zyngier
2023-12-07 15:11 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-12-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm64: vgic: Add a non-locking primitive for kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy() Marc Zyngier
2023-12-07 15:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: vgic: Force vcpu vgic teardown on vcpu destroy Marc Zyngier
2023-12-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: vgic: Ensure that slots_lock is held in vgic_register_all_redist_iodevs() Marc Zyngier
2023-12-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: Convert comment into an assertion in kvm_io_bus_register_dev() Marc Zyngier
2023-12-12 7:45 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: vgic fixes for 6.7 Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231207151201.3028710-2-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).