From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F89C4167D for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:37:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=vzuzifL9cyEmIWpZ6o9czM1CfHGnqrJP4r8p2taZjTw=; b=gF4sLDte3cxnTF G02/7Fy8zv6CDAPuP6wnbRSjPvPCAGja0kw9/qNKtYeH++d7AZWwmnodq9FmbCdJMgmbp3iJtZDZr 6rAV49fugKoijFBPUVy5DeY+D8oH4zZwJ5sU1Ca4p9ujnFna+9lieeC5VGl/Pa0wdg4sN8zXkN18H Ouiy8eyv3XqvC5Go5AdTJJw2AxIv3Vd3Zw4nRNW1n4Z6DFOXt7K8TTk+/yBursAg6/cLp4XTHLKDS Ekrf/BV4YBlI8qvxjaE5zqsxo7U7ulGZ6mXd9di3VdGEFtwbm94aqPMxyoETdqYhsEMTEs6CveRwl LOrZIyN50M255yaSSeWQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rDpdX-000wMV-0b; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:36:39 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rDpdR-000wGC-1m; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:36:38 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Srfc62XW9z688KN; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 01:34:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC9911400DB; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 01:36:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.227.76) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:36:27 +0000 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:36:26 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: "Russell King (Oracle)" CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , , , James Morse Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 02/21] ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container packages Message-ID: <20231214173626.00005062@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.76] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.241) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231214_093633_871692_A29E04EE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.19 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:49:21 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > From: James Morse > > ACPI has two ways of describing processors in the DSDT. From ACPI v6.5, > 5.2.12: > > "Starting with ACPI Specification 6.3, the use of the Processor() object > was deprecated. Only legacy systems should continue with this usage. On > the Itanium architecture only, a _UID is provided for the Processor() > that is a string object. This usage of _UID is also deprecated since it > can preclude an OSPM from being able to match a processor to a > non-enumerable device, such as those defined in the MADT. From ACPI > Specification 6.3 onward, all processor objects for all architectures > except Itanium must now use Device() objects with an _HID of ACPI0007, > and use only integer _UID values." > > Also see https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/08_Processor_Configuration_and_Control.html#declaring-processors > > Duplicate descriptions are not allowed, the ACPI processor driver already > parses the UID from both devices and containers. acpi_processor_get_info() > returns an error if the UID exists twice in the DSDT. > > The missing probe for CPUs described as packages creates a problem for > moving the cpu_register() calls into the acpi_processor driver, as CPUs > described like this don't get registered, leading to errors from other > subsystems when they try to add new sysfs entries to the CPU node. > (e.g. topology_sysfs_init()'s use of topology_add_dev() via cpuhp) > > To fix this, parse the processor container and call acpi_processor_add() > for each processor that is discovered like this. The processor container > handler is added with acpi_scan_add_handler(), so no detach call will > arrive. > > Qemu TCG describes CPUs using processor devices in a processor container. > For more information, see build_cpus_aml() in Qemu hw/acpi/cpu.c and > https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/08_Processor_Configuration_and_Control.html#processor-container-device > > Signed-off-by: James Morse > Tested-by: Miguel Luis > Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri > Tested-by: Jianyong Wu > --- > Outstanding comments: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914145353.000072e2@Huawei.com Looks like you resolved those (were all patch description things). So I'm happy. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Thanks, J > https://lore.kernel.org/r/50571c2f-aa3c-baeb-3add-cd59e0eddc02@redhat.com > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > index 4fe2ef54088c..6a542e0ce396 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > @@ -626,9 +626,31 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler processor_handler = { > }, > }; > > +static acpi_status acpi_processor_container_walk(acpi_handle handle, > + u32 lvl, > + void *context, > + void **rv) > +{ > + struct acpi_device *adev; > + acpi_status status; > + > + adev = acpi_get_acpi_dev(handle); > + if (!adev) > + return AE_ERROR; > + > + status = acpi_processor_add(adev, &processor_device_ids[0]); > + acpi_put_acpi_dev(adev); > + > + return status; > +} > + > static int acpi_processor_container_attach(struct acpi_device *dev, > const struct acpi_device_id *id) > { > + acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, dev->handle, > + ACPI_UINT32_MAX, acpi_processor_container_walk, > + NULL, NULL, NULL); > + > return 1; > } > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel