From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AEE3C4332F for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:18:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=4JUfQDrfOYUCuZzr8o/fUJ8Q9TJGXVuEFaoY0XV2B9Q=; b=ws2TKh5KpBcSrF btws0BEf60wJU3emV6F2XfIhI+nu4B/U7gkcALT4lMPB/QNQjZ/yz8muslnHfpbceZ/7tWlUEe0Ew k+nLa+GXRD4bAQKj27S8RooSYUszYgftadko6Gwzuq9yGRi4D+tmeVvKiQqokYtcQ4jWQhi8aoM8D KRlumaj4w6wnW622noxyaizKRz1q+2gvS2M5e+5twtQlZ9ww+2lfXPgdFOwpy+7iNsQ7tOBLF/rhy ZUNaNH51fL3cNCEKu3hAtjq/oGk06GyTz+nblADlxHjlyWFcFzjqPi8FXVBZueTGHc6Nvyiiuong9 jvi71Ndu8DX0FU2JMcMQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rEAtB-003qNW-32; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:18:13 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rEAt9-003qMq-1w; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:18:12 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SsDrC5nzSz6JB0q; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 00:16:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FBAC140133; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 00:18:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.227.76) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:18:04 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:18:03 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: "Russell King (Oracle)" CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , , , James Morse Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 10/21] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present Message-ID: <20231215161803.00002d8c@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.76] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231215_081811_778723_23C3CA42 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.38 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:50:02 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > From: James Morse > > When called acpi_processor_post_eject() unconditionally make a CPU > not-present and unregisters it. > > To add support for AML events where the CPU has become disabled, but > remains present, the _STA method should be checked before calling > acpi_processor_remove(). > > Rename acpi_processor_post_eject() acpi_processor_remove_possible(), and > check the _STA before calling. > > Adding the function prototype for arch_unregister_cpu() allows the > preprocessor guards to be removed. > > After this change CPUs will remain registered and visible to > user-space as offline if buggy firmware triggers an eject-request, > but doesn't clear the corresponding _STA bits after _EJ0 has been > called. > > Signed-off-by: James Morse > Tested-by: Miguel Luis > Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri > Tested-by: Jianyong Wu LGTM Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel